The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
hotelizer se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do hotelizer mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| hotelizer |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | hotelizer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | hotelizer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | hotelizer |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Hotelizer PMS by hotelizer and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s operational complexity and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management, but they diverge sharply in market presence, scalability, and feature depth. With the current review count and recent feedback, Mews’s reputation is significantly stronger, indicating a more reliable and evolving solution for modern hoteliers.
Will your hotel benefit more from Mews’s extensive integrations and proven scalability, or does Hotelizer’s simpler approach suit your current needs? Let’s explore the critical differences.
Hotelizer offers a basic, no-frills PMS designed primarily for small properties or single-property operators. Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-native platform used by thousands worldwide, with 758 recent reviews in the last six months, compared to Hotelizer’s lack of recent review data.
While Hotelizer claims to streamline operations, its zero-star ratings and absence of recent user feedback suggest it may not be keeping pace with modern demands. Conversely, Mews’s 4.62/5 rating and high likelihood to recommend at 93% highlight its popularity and ongoing advancement. Are you prepared to rely on a product with no recent reviews or one actively supported and improved?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich system capable of supporting multi-property management, extensive integrations, and guest-centric features, Mews is the clear choice. Its broad ecosystem of 336 verified partners, including channel managers, revenue tools, and payment solutions, makes it ideal for scaling operations.
If your property is small, operates in a single location, and your team values simplicity over advanced automation or integrations, Hotelizer might suffice — but its lack of recent reviews and features suggests it may not keep up long-term. For most hotels aiming for growth and efficiency, Mews provides a more future-proof investment.
User experience is critical. Mews is rated at 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training needs. Users frequently mention that Mews is “the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market,” simplifying daily tasks.
Hotelizer, rated at 0/5 with no recent reviews, offers no clear evidence of usability. The absence of current user feedback, combined with its low rating, indicates it likely struggles in this area. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, mobile check-in, digital registration, automated night audit, and extensive reporting tools. These features are proven to support complex, multi-property operations and enhance guest experiences.
Hotelizer offers no documented features beyond basic reservation management. Its lack of advanced functionalities, coupled with no recent updates or reviews, suggests it may not meet the needs of hotels requiring automation or guest engagement tools. Edge: Mews.
Customer support ratings favor Mews, rated at 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting responsive, helpful, and proactive assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Users say, “Mews support sets new standards,” and appreciate its quick resolution to issues.
Hotelizer’s support is rated at zero, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or effectiveness. Without current feedback, confidence in its support quality is low. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s marketplace connects to over 336 verified partners, including payment gateways, POS, channel managers, and revenue tools, enabling comprehensive, tailored solutions. This extensive ecosystem supports automation and operational flexibility.
Hotelizer offers no documented integrations or partner network, limiting its adaptability. For hotels seeking a connected tech environment, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.64/5 score from 679 reviews, with high ratings across segments—from independent hotels to chains—and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers praise its functionality, support, and ease of use.
Hotelizer has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its satisfaction level. Given the current data, Mews’s reputation is significantly stronger. Edge: Mews.
Hotelizer’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may operate on a custom or less transparent model. Mews charges a $900 monthly base fee, with no implementation or hidden costs, providing clarity for budgeting.
Considering the scale and features, Mews’s pricing is competitive for its scope. Hotelizer’s lack of transparent pricing makes it difficult to evaluate value, but its limited features and support likely result in lower long-term ROI.
Mews's core advantage lies in its extensive feature set, proven scalability, and recent positive reviews. It’s a mature platform that consistently updates to meet modern hospitality demands, making it suitable for hotels looking to grow.
Hotelizer appears to be a basic, less supported option suited for small properties with minimal needs. With no recent reviews and limited features, it’s risky for hotels aiming for operational efficiency and future expansion.
For hoteliers prioritizing reliability, integrations, and ongoing support, Mews is the definitive choice. If your property is small, static, and budget-constrained, Hotelizer might suffice temporarily — but it’s unlikely to support long-term growth or complexity.
In summary: For most hotels aiming to elevate guest experiences, automate operations, and expand seamlessly, Mews’s modern, comprehensive platform is the clear winner. Hotelizer’s simplicity may appeal in the short term but falls short of the capabilities and support modern hotels require.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| hotelizer |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Hotelizer PMS e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | hotelizer |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Hotelizer PMS e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Hotelizer PMS oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Hotelizer PMS: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. hotelizer tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos