The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 550 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Marriott International se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 550 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 549 | 1 |
Apos analisar 550 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do HOTELTIME mais valorizam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics, enquanto os usuarios do Marriott International destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 219 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 238 avaliacoes | #59 1 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #2 46 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #8 7 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avaliacoes | #68 1 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 241 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #4 143 avaliacoes | #60 1 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #4 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #52 4 avaliacoes | #43 1 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #5 111 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #1 21 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and FOSSE by Marriott International hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and your team's needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and support. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a high user rating, whereas FOSSE is a proprietary system with limited recent reviews and a narrower feature set. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
HotelTime PMS stands out with over 430 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making it the more trusted and validated option. FOSSE, by contrast, has only a single review in the past six months and a low 2/5 rating, indicating limited recent user satisfaction. For hotels seeking a proven, well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the more reliable choice.
HotelTime PMS and FOSSE are designed to automate and simplify hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. HotelTime provides a feature-rich, cloud-based system with extensive integrations, automation, and a broad user base. FOSSE, as Marriott’s proprietary solution, offers core reservation and guest management capabilities but lacks many advanced features found in HotelTime.
Where they diverge most sharply is in user feedback and system maturity. HotelTime’s recent reviews emphasize its stability, customer support, and ease of use, while FOSSE’s reviews are sparse, older, and critical of usability. Do you prioritize a system with a significant, recent user base and continuous improvements? Or are you comfortable with a more limited, internally managed solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with extensive third-party integrations, choose HotelTime. It’s suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, boutique hotels, and chains, thanks to its 51 unique features and widespread adoption across 20+ countries.
If your hotel is part of Marriott’s ecosystem and you prioritize a system designed for motels or similar properties, FOSSE might seem appropriate. However, given its limited reviews and low satisfaction ratings, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the safer investment for most hotels.
HotelTime’s user interface is highly rated at 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding process. Its support team is known for responsiveness, helping staff adopt the system efficiently.
FOSSE, with a 2/5 ease-of-use rating and no recent reviews, faces criticism for its lack of a graphical user interface and complex, menu-heavy operation. Users report that FOSSE is less accessible and more time-consuming to learn and operate.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 51 exclusive features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automated night audits, mobile check-in, and more—covering operational needs comprehensively. It also supports ancillary revenue tracking, custom rates, and real-time reporting.
FOSSE offers the core functions—reservations, check-ins, billing—but lacks many of the advanced capabilities available in HotelTime. Its feature set appears minimal and not well documented, which limits its usefulness for complex operations.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful training, and ongoing assistance. Users commend its responsiveness, especially for international hotels needing timely help.
FOSSE’s support ratings and recent feedback are unavailable, and the limited reviews suggest a less proactive or responsive support system. Given the importance of reliable support for hotel operations, HotelTime’s customer service provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, revenue management tools, and POS systems. Its wide-ranging integrations allow hotels to customize their tech stack effectively.
FOSSE, with only 2 verified partners, offers limited connectivity, primarily within the Marriott ecosystem. Its narrow integration scope constrains flexibility and adaptability for hotels using multiple third-party solutions.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s recent reviews indicate a 4.83/5 rating, with 27 reviews in the last six months, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, showing strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and resort properties, praise its ease of use and support.
FOSSE has only one recent review, rating it 2/5, and no current feedback, reflecting limited or declining satisfaction. Hotels seeking a highly-rated system should favor HotelTime.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a flat monthly fee of $600, with no implementation or trial fees. Pricing includes a broad set of features appropriate for diverse property types.
FOSSE’s pricing details are unavailable publicly, but as a Marriott proprietary system, it’s likely included within broader corporate agreements or licensing fees. The explicit cost is less transparent and may involve contractual commitments.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or operates with minimal technology needs, as HotelTime’s extensive features may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if your hotel requires modern UI, extensive integrations, or comprehensive automation—FOSSE’s limited features and older review data suggest it may not meet evolving hotel needs.
The core difference is that HotelTime offers a modern, cloud-based, feature-packed system with a strong user base and recent positive reviews. FOSSE, by comparison, is an older, internal Marriott system with limited recent feedback and fewer features.
For hotels seeking a proven, versatile, and well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the clear winner due to its extensive features, ease of use, and recent high ratings. It suits properties of all sizes, especially those wanting to automate and integrate their operations.
If your hotel is part of Marriott and your needs are basic, FOSSE might suffice, but its limited recent reviews and user dissatisfaction suggest it’s not the best choice for most independent or competitive properties.
In summary, HotelTime provides a more reliable, scalable, and user-rated solution, making it the better investment for most hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest experience.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, HotelTime PMS e FOSSE compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. HotelTime PMS e FOSSE compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. HotelTime PMS oferece 58 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto FOSSE oferece 2. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 2.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
HotelTime PMS: Nao. FOSSE: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. HOTELTIME tem um HT Score de 92 e Marriott International tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos