The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
CEI Europe se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 549 | 0 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do HOTELTIME mais valorizam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics, enquanto os usuarios do CEI Europe destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 219 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 238 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #2 46 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #8 7 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 241 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #4 143 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #4 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #52 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #5 111 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #1 21 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical decision for your hotel, impacting daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Quohotel PMS by CEI Europe both aim to streamline your hotel’s workflows, but they differ significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a larger user base, while CEI Europe’s offering appears less detailed and has fewer reviews. How do these differences influence your decision?
HotelTime PMS stands out with a high HTR Score of over 91, a 4.83/5 rating based on 433 reviews, and recent reviews from the last six months bolster its relevance. Conversely, Quohotel PMS has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction.
HotelTime is praised for its ease of use, with a 4.66/5 rating and a dedicated support team, whereas CEI Europe’s support and user feedback are not documented. HotelTime’s extensive feature set—over 50 unique functionalities—supports diverse hotel needs, including advanced revenue management, CRM, and integrated POS. Quohotel’s capabilities are less specified, and the lack of detailed features or customer feedback makes HotelTime the more tangible choice for reliability and proven performance. Do you prioritize a proven, well-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable PMS suitable for properties of all sizes—especially those requiring extensive integrations, revenue management, or multi-department functionality—HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its large user base across Europe, Middle East, Asia Pacific, and Africa, along with a robust partner network, demonstrates its versatility.
If your hotel is a small operation or startup seeking a simple, straightforward solution with minimal complexity, Quohotel PMS could suffice, though its limited public information and lack of recent reviews make it less reliable for critical decision-making. Given the data, HotelTime is better suited for established hotels aiming for comprehensive operational control.
HotelTime PMS boasts a user rating of 4.66/5, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users appreciate that its design allows staff to adapt quickly, with some noting that initial module setup can be complex but manageable with proper training.
In contrast, CEI Europe offers no available ratings or user feedback regarding ease of use, leaving uncertainty about its user experience. The lack of reviews and detailed UI information favors HotelTime, which has a proven track record of user-friendly operation. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s feature list exceeds 50, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, online check-in, mobile app, revenue management, and more. These features are designed to cover all aspects of hotel operations and revenue optimization.
Quohotel’s feature set is not explicitly detailed in available data, making it difficult to compare directly. HotelTime’s extensive, proven functionalities give it a significant advantage. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s customer support is rated at 4.73/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and dedicated assistance. Hoteliers report that support staff go above and beyond, including personalized onboarding and prompt issue resolution.
CEI Europe has no visible customer support ratings or recent testimonials, making it impossible to assess support quality. With a strong support reputation and recent positive reviews, HotelTime clearly offers more reliable customer care. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major systems like Duetto, Profitroom, and STR, enabling seamless data flow across booking engines, POS, revenue management, and more. Its extensive integrations support complex, multi-system hotel environments.
CEI Europe has only one verified partner listed, significantly limiting its integration capacity. For hotels seeking flexibility and a broad ecosystem of connected tools, HotelTime’s integration count is a decisive advantage. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime has a strong reputation, with a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews, including recent feedback from 27 users in the last six months. Hotels across various segments—resorts, boutique hotels, city center properties—rate it highly for functionality and support.
CEI Europe lacks public ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge hoteliers’ satisfaction. Given the more than 400 recent reviews, HotelTime’s higher rating and sustained positive feedback clearly make it the preferred choice. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s pricing begins at $600 per month, with no freemium or trial options mentioned. Quohotel’s pricing details are not publicly available, making it difficult to compare direct costs.
Without transparent pricing for Quohotel, HotelTime’s clear fee structure and known value delivery favor it for budget planning. If cost transparency is a priority, HotelTime clearly states its price.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
HotelTime PMS offers a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, a large and satisfied user base, and recent, positive reviews. Its high ratings and transparent pricing make it a clear choice for hotels seeking reliability and scalability.
Quohotel PMS, while possibly suitable for small, straightforward hotels, lacks publicly available feedback, recent reviews, and detailed features. Its limited integration options and unclear support reputation make it a less advisable choice for larger or more complex properties.
If your hotel values a well-supported, comprehensive PMS that can handle your current and future needs, HotelTime PMS is the recommended solution. For smaller properties with very basic requirements, Quohotel might suffice, but caution is advised due to the limited information available.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
CEI Europe | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, HotelTime PMS e Quohotel PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. HotelTime PMS e Quohotel PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. HotelTime PMS oferece 58 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Quohotel PMS oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
HotelTime PMS: Nao. Quohotel PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. HOTELTIME tem um HT Score de 92 e CEI Europe tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos