The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 47 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Infor se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Uplisting se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 47 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 47 | 0 |
Apos analisar 47 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Infor mais valorizam facilidade de uso, relatórios, integração, enquanto os usuarios do Uplisting destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Facilidade de uso
▾
|
|
|
+
Relatórios
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração
▾
|
|
|
+
Módulo de limpeza
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Apoiar
▾
|
|
|
−
Facilidade de uso
▾
|
|
|
−
Problemas de atualização
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #44 8 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #25 24 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #19 9 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #24 2 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #23 26 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #29 8 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #31 6 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #22 20 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #24 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico | #28 1 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Uplisting hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and the scale of your property management. Infor HMS offers a robust, enterprise-level solution with extensive features and a strong regional presence, making it suitable for larger, varied hotels. Uplisting, on the other hand, is tailored for short-term rental operators seeking streamlined management across multiple listings, but it lacks recent reviews and broader integrations. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
Infor HMS, with more than 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, is the clearer choice for hoteliers seeking a comprehensive property management system. Its broad feature set, strong regional presence, and high customer satisfaction make it a more proven solution. Uplisting, despite its niche appeal and automation capabilities, has no recent reviews and limited integration options, making it a less reliable choice for your hotel right now.
Infor HMS is a full-scale property management system built to handle diverse hotel operations, from luxury resorts to boutique hotels, with a focus on automation, integrations, and extensive modules like revenue management and housekeeping. Uplisting caters mainly to short-term rental hosts managing multiple listings across platforms, emphasizing guest communication automation and calendar synchronization.
While Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations—including major booking channels and revenue tools—Uplisting only integrates with two verified partners and shares just one with Infor. The breadth of Infor’s regional presence (covering Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, and the Middle East) underscores its suitability for hotels operating across multiple markets, whereas Uplisting’s limited geographical footprint suggests a narrower application scope.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but Infor’s focus extends beyond simple booking management to include detailed reporting, revenue tracking, multi-currency support, and on-premise or cloud deployment. Uplisting focuses on automating guest communication, calendar sync, and property-level tasks, but it may lack the depth needed for large or complex properties.
Given the scope and scale of your hotel, Infor HMS addresses a broader set of needs and has a proven track record. Uplisting may be appealing for small rental operations but is less suited for full-scale hotels. Are you looking for an all-in-one solution with enterprise capabilities or a streamlined platform for short-term rentals?
Edge: Infor HMS
If your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system with extensive modules, Infor HMS is your best fit. Its rich feature set includes housekeeping, guest profiles, central management, multi-lingual support, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits—all proven to improve operational flow. The system's 46 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.04/5 rating, show sustained recent satisfaction.
Uplisting is better suited for small-scale rental portfolios, especially if automation of guest communications, calendar synchronization, and multi-channel management are your priorities. However, its lack of recent reviews and limited integrations (only two verified partners) mean it’s less validated for larger or more complex hotel environments.
In summary, if your hotel is looking for a scalable, feature-rich PMS with regional support and a proven track record, Infor HMS is the clear choice. If your operation is primarily short-term rentals with minimal complexity, Uplisting may suffice, but its current lack of recent feedback is a concern.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, based on user feedback that describes navigation as generally straightforward once familiar with its format, though some find the interface less aesthetically appealing. The onboarding process earns a 3.64/5, with users noting that support during setup is helpful but could be more comprehensive. Support staff are praised for responsiveness and professionalism, which eases staff adoption.
Uplisting has no recent reviews or detailed ratings, so assessing its user-friendliness is difficult. Its niche focus on short-term rentals suggests a simpler platform, but without recent user feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Given Infor’s established presence and positive support ratings, it offers a more reliable onboarding and user experience. Unless Uplisting has significantly improved or has a straightforward interface, edge goes to Infor HMS for usability.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, centralized user management, multi-lingual interface, multi-currency support, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features collectively support large, complex hotel operations.
Uplisting currently has no unique features listed, focusing primarily on automation of guest communication, calendar sync, and property management for short-term rentals. Its narrow feature set limits its applicability for full-service hotels.
With a broader and more detailed feature offering, Infor HMS clearly surpasses Uplisting. If comprehensive management tools are important, Infor is the better choice.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS’s support scores 4.04/5, with many reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance. Users often mention that the support team guides them effectively through issues, which is crucial given the system's complexity. Support is available 24/7, ensuring minimal downtime and quick resolution.
Uplisting has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current support quality. Its limited user base and lack of recent feedback suggest support quality is unverified and potentially weaker.
For reliable, accessible support, Infor HMS takes the lead. Hotel teams planning for ongoing assistance should favor Infor.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking channels, revenue systems, and payment processors. Shared integrations include Duve, while Infor’s unique partners encompass Priority Software, Trevo, HQ Revenue, and others—indicating a mature, versatile ecosystem.
Uplisting only connects to two verified partners, with PriceLabs being the sole listed integration. Its limited integration scope reduces flexibility for hotels needing to connect with multiple operational tools.
The extensive integration network of Infor HMS makes it a more adaptable choice for hotels seeking a connected, automated environment. Uplisting’s limited integrations restrict its utility in complex hotel settings.
Edge: Infor HMS
Infor HMS has received 46 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and a high likelihood to recommend at 74%. Reviewers across segments—especially independent and boutique hotels—praise its customization, operational efficiency, and support.
Uplisting lacks recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Its niche appeal and absence of feedback mean it’s less validated by user experience.
Given the recent review volume and high ratings, Infor HMS is clearly preferred by hoteliers. It’s the safer bet for your hotel’s management needs.
Edge: Infor HMS
Pricing data for both systems is unavailable. Neither product offers a freemium model or clear monthly or per-room fees. Implementation costs and trial options are also not specified, suggesting that quotes are likely provided upon request.
Without transparent pricing, your decision should focus on feature fit and support quality rather than cost. Infor’s long-standing market presence and review volume suggest it may be a more substantial investment but also a more feature-rich solution.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or primarily focused on short-term rentals with minimal complexity. Small independent hotels with straightforward needs might find Infor's extensive features overwhelming and too costly.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your hotel is a large, full-service property needing detailed revenue management, extensive integrations, or multi-regional support. The platform may lack the depth and recent validation for larger or more complex operations.
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, scalable property management system built for hotels requiring deep functionality, integrations, and regional support. Its extensive features, support, and recent reviews position it as a reliable choice for medium to large hotels seeking operational excellence. Its broad application across hotel segments, especially boutiques and independents, underscores its versatility.
Uplisting, while designed for short-term rentals, lacks recent reviews or a broad feature set, limiting its applicability for larger hotels. Its automation capabilities are useful but only within a narrow scope, making it less suitable for comprehensive hotel management.
If your hotel is looking for a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive support and integrations, Infor HMS is the clear choice. For small-scale rental operations with minimal complexity, Uplisting can be considered, but its current lack of validation is a concern.
Final verdict: For most hotels, especially those seeking a full-featured, reliable management system, Infor HMS outperforms Uplisting—stick with proven, recent feedback-backed solutions.
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Infor HMS e Uplisting compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Faturamento direto | ||
| Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções | ||
| Módulo de limpeza | ||
| Perfis de convidados | ||
| Suporte on-line 24 horas por dia, 7 dias por semana | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 8 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
O Infor HMS é geralmente considerado fácil de navegar, com opções de busca multifacetadas e intuitivas. No entanto, alguns usuários acham que a interf... O Infor HMS é geralmente considerado fácil de navegar, com opções de busca multifacetadas e intuitivas. No entanto, alguns usuários acham que a interface do usuário carece de estética e sentem que ela poderia ser mais intuitiva.
Os recursos de relatórios são frequentemente destacados. Os usuários apreciam tanto os relatórios padrão quanto a capacidade de criar relatórios perso... Os recursos de relatórios são frequentemente destacados. Os usuários apreciam tanto os relatórios padrão quanto a capacidade de criar relatórios personalizados, auxiliando no rastreamento detalhado do desempenho. No entanto, alguns acham que as atualizações interrompem os formatos e as funcionalidades dos relatórios.
O Infor HMS é elogiado por sua integração perfeita com plataformas de reserva como Booking.com, HRS e Expedia. Isso reduz significativamente os erros... O Infor HMS é elogiado por sua integração perfeita com plataformas de reserva como Booking.com, HRS e Expedia. Isso reduz significativamente os erros de entrada manual e melhora a eficiência no gerenciamento de reservas.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
A equipe de suporte da Infor HMS é frequentemente mencionada por sua capacidade de resposta e profissionalismo, cruciais para resolver problemas pront... A equipe de suporte da Infor HMS é frequentemente mencionada por sua capacidade de resposta e profissionalismo, cruciais para resolver problemas prontamente. Os usuários apreciam como os representantes de suporte os orientam nas resoluções de problemas.
O Infor HMS é geralmente considerado fácil de navegar, com opções de busca multifacetadas e intuitivas. No entanto, alguns usuários acham que a interf... O Infor HMS é geralmente considerado fácil de navegar, com opções de busca multifacetadas e intuitivas. No entanto, alguns usuários acham que a interface do usuário carece de estética e sentem que ela poderia ser mais intuitiva.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Infor HMS e Uplisting compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Infor HMS oferece 113 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Uplisting oferece 2. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Infor HMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Infor HMS: Nao. Uplisting: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Infor tem um HT Score de 22 e Uplisting tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos