The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 888 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Marriott International se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 888 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 1 | 887 |
Apos analisar 888 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Marriott International mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #59 1 avaliacoes | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #68 1 avaliacoes | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #60 1 avaliacoes | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #43 1 avaliacoes | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both FOSSE by Marriott International and Mews PMS tackle core hotel functions like reservations, billing, and guest management, but they diverge significantly in usability, features, and support. Given the stark differences in review volume and recency, Mews emerges as the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Are you looking for a system that’s easy to adopt and keeps pace with modern hospitality? Or do you prefer a proprietary platform tied to a global hotel brand? Let’s compare these two options head-to-head.
FOSSE is Marriott’s proprietary platform designed exclusively for its properties, meaning it’s deeply integrated with Marriott’s ecosystem. However, it’s heavily menu-driven, lacks a graphical user interface (GUI), and offers a dated user experience, as reflected in its low 2/5 overall rating from just one review.
In contrast, Mews is a cloud-native, third-party PMS with over 750 reviews, boasting a 4.62/5 rating and a recent surge of 98 reviews in the last six months. Users praise its modern interface, ease of use, and extensive third-party integrations. Do you want a system with proven scalability and community support? Or a proprietary solution limited to one brand?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel needs a flexible, user-friendly PMS that supports a wide variety of property types—from boutique to large chains—Mews should be your go-to. Its extensive third-party connectivity and open API empower you to customize workflows and integrate new tools effortlessly.
If you’re part of Marriott’s ecosystem and prefer a system built specifically for their operational procedures, FOSSE might seem appealing—though it’s notably less intuitive and less supported. Given the recent reviews’ volume and recency, Mews’s community-backed reliability makes it the clear choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews scores a high 4.7/5 on ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface, and straightforward onboarding. Support and training are rated highly, and users report staff adopting the system quickly due to its clear design.
FOSSE, however, has a rating of just 2/5 for ease of use. Reviewers describe it as menu-heavy, lacking a GUI, and key-stroke intensive, which hampers productivity and staff onboarding. Given the recent active feedback, Mews’s user-friendliness is indisputable.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an impressive suite of 59 features, including a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, digital check-in, mobile housekeeping, and more. Its marketplace hosts over 1,000 integrations, allowing full customization.
FOSSE’s features are limited, with only core functionalities embedded within Marriott’s ecosystem, and no detailed feature list available. Its lack of modern capabilities and integrations places it well behind Mews’s broad functionality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are strong, with a 4.27/5 score and recent reviews highlighting prompt assistance and responsive support teams. Guests note that support is proactive and helpful, especially during onboarding.
FOSSE’s support appears limited, with only a 3/5 rating and criticism about delays and manual processes. Its support experience is less documented, and given the small review count, Mews’s support remains more reliable.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS, revenue tools, and many specialized integrations. Its open API and marketplace facilitate adding new partners quickly.
FOSSE has only 2 verified partnerships, with no detailed list of integrations. Its limited connectivity hampers adaptability in a competitive hotel landscape.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.64/5 rating from 679 reviews, with independent hotels, boutique properties, and city hotels praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Users consistently recommend it for scalability and flexibility.
FOSSE has only one review with a 2/5 rating, criticizing its complexity and lack of user-friendliness. The recent review data favors Mews in reputation and user satisfaction.
Edge: Mews.
FOSSE’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, being an internal Marriott system, with costs absorbed into broader enterprise agreements. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no implementation or ongoing fees, making its pricing transparent and scalable.
Since direct FOSSE pricing isn’t available, Mews’s straightforward pricing model offers better predictability for hotels considering ROI and budget planning.
Edge: Mews.
FOSSE is a proprietary system built for Marriott’s vast ecosystem, designed to serve large, brand-aligned properties. Its complexity, limited integrations, and low user scores make it less suitable for independent hoteliers or those seeking agility.
Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-based, highly rated, and feature-rich platform favored by a broad spectrum of properties. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and active user community make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Choose FOSSE if you operate within Marriott and need seamless brand integration. Opt for Mews if you want a flexible, scalable, and well-supported system capable of empowering your team and delighting your guests.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, FOSSE e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. FOSSE e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. FOSSE oferece 2 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 2.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
FOSSE: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Marriott International tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos