The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Modotel se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do Modotel destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
Modotel |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Modotel PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and strategic goals. Mews, with its extensive features and proven track record, addresses a broad spectrum of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, by automating core operations and offering a vast integration ecosystem. Modotel, with fewer reviews and limited market presence, lacks publicly available supporting data, making Mews the more reliable option for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
Given the significant difference in review volume, recent feedback, and overall ratings, Mews clearly dominates in performance, support, and user satisfaction. Are you ready to prioritize a platform with a proven track record, or are you considering an untested alternative?
Mews and Modotel serve the same overarching goal: streamlining hotel operations. Mews excels with a high overall rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews—98 of which are recent—indicating strong and current user confidence. In contrast, Modotel’s ratings are unavailable or unverified, with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its reliability or effectiveness.
While Mews offers an array of functionalities like automated reservations, guest communications, revenue management, and over 336 verified integrations, Modotel’s feature set remains undisclosed. Mews’s cloud-based approach and extensive third-party marketplace make it adaptable across diverse hotel types, whereas Modotel provides no publicly documented features or real-world performance data. Do you want your hotel’s PMS to be backed by verified reviews and proven features?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable system with a broad array of features, Mews is the clear choice. Its target segments include boutique hotels, hostels, city-center properties, and large chains, with a review count nearly 760 and recent feedback from nearly 100 users—most praising its usability, automation, and support.
If your hotel’s requirements are minimal or experimental, and you’re willing to take a risk on an unverified solution, Modotel might be worth exploring. However, without concrete reviews or documented features, it’s unlikely to match Mews’s reliability, support, or ecosystem. For hotels aiming for growth, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, smarter investment.
Mews’s UI and onboarding are highly rated, with a 4.7/5 ease of use score from 758 reviews, and a 4.39/5 onboarding rating. Reviewers highlight its modern, intuitive interface and quick setup, often remarking that staff adoption is smooth and minimal training is needed. Multiple reviews describe Mews as “user-friendly,” “thoughtful,” and “easy to navigate.”
Modotel’s user experience is undocumented in the available reviews, with no recent user feedback or ratings to assess its accessibility or ease of implementation. The absence of detailed support or onboarding data suggests that Mews has a clear advantage here. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive array of 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, booking engine, integrated CRS, digital registration, automated night audit, task management, and over 336 verified integrations. These capabilities allow for deep customization and operational control.
Modotel’s feature set remains undisclosed and unverified, with no publicly documented functionalities or integrations. The lack of detailed feature data makes it impossible to compare their capabilities directly, but given Mews’s proven extensive feature list, Mews is the clear leader. Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 across 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its responsive, helpful support team and quick issue resolution. Users often mention that Mews support is “supportive,” “professional,” and “available 24/7,” especially with its premium support packages.
In contrast, Modotel has no available review data or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unknown. Without verified support feedback, Mews’s strong support reputation makes it the better choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, with 93% likelihood to recommend, reflects broad, positive sentiment from hotels of various sizes and segments, especially boutique, city-center, and hostel properties. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and support, indicating consistent satisfaction across segments.
Modotel’s absence of reviews and ratings means no comparable data exists. Based on available information, hotelier confidence strongly favors Mews. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or free trial options publicly listed. Its structured pricing indicates a mid-to-high investment, justified by extensive features and support.
Modotel’s pricing details are unavailable, with no public pricing or trial offers shared. This lack of transparency complicates comparison, but the absence of verifiable value proposition makes Mews’s pricing more predictable and justified.
Not ideal if you prefer a minimal or unverified system, or are exploring a solution without documented features, reviews, or regional presence.
Not ideal if you need a reliable, well-supported system with proven features, integrations, and extensive hotel segment experience.
Mews is a mature, feature-rich platform with a proven track record of high user satisfaction and recent growth in reviews. Its extensive ecosystem, automation capabilities, and support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes committed to operational excellence.
Modotel remains an unverified contender with no available reviews or documented features, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and growth. If your hotel prioritizes stability, proven performance, and support, Mews is the clear winner.
For hotels aiming to streamline operations, improve guest experience, and scale confidently, Mews offers the most compelling, validated solution. Only consider Modotel if you’re experimenting with minimal operational needs and are prepared for an untested platform.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Modotel | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Modotel PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Modotel PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 335 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Modotel PMS oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Modotel PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Modotel tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos