The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Persefone se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do Persefone destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Persefone by Persefone hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience, while Persefone offers a more traditional, all-in-one platform with a strong Italian legacy. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s current stage and future plans?
Mews is a cloud-native property management system with a high user rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations. Persefone, with over 17 years in the market and more than 3,000 hotels served, is a European-based system renowned for its comprehensive suite of features and reliable support but has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings. Does your hotel prioritize innovative technology and a broad ecosystem, or do you prefer a proven, integrated package with long-term stability?
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a modern, flexible platform favored by boutique, hostel, and city-center hotels, whereas Persefone’s reputation is built on stability and a full set of features, mostly appreciated by Italian hotels. Are you seeking a cutting-edge, scalable system or a tried-and-true solution with deep local expertise?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, go with Mews. Its recent review count and ratings demonstrate active adoption and ongoing improvements, making it ideal for hotels aiming to modernize operations quickly.
If your hotel prefers a traditional, all-in-one software suite with extensive features designed for the Italian market, Persefone might suit your needs better. Its long-standing presence and integrated approach appeal to hotels that value stability and a comprehensive management tool, especially if they operate primarily in Italy or similar markets.
For fast-growing hotels seeking agility, Mews’s open API, marketplace, and rapid innovation are unmatched. Conversely, if you prioritize a fully integrated, regional solution with a history of serving thousands of hotels, Persefone’s deep feature set and support may be advantageous.
Mews boasts a user rating of 4.7/5 for ease of use across 679 reviews, with many hoteliers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and modern design. Recent feedback highlights its simple reservation dashboards, guest messaging, and remote access, supporting staff of all tech skill levels.
Persefone has not publicly shared a recent ease-of-use rating or detailed user feedback, but its long history suggests a traditional, feature-rich interface that may require more training and adaptation, especially for staff unfamiliar with legacy systems. Is your team ready for a modern, user-centric platform or better served by a familiar, all-in-one interface?
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 49 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, automated night audit, guest app, real-time reporting, shift planning, and more. Its broad suite is designed to improve operational agility and guest engagement.
Persefone, on the other hand, consolidates all functionalities into a single web solution, but specific feature counts or unique functionalities are not publicly detailed. It likely includes core hotel management features but lacks the extensive optional modules and customization that Mews provides.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a support rating of 4.27/5 from 758 recent reviews, with users often citing quick, helpful responses and effective onboarding, though some report occasional bugs that are resolved swiftly. Its large global team offers 24/7 support, aiding in onboarding and ongoing troubleshooting.
Persefone emphasizes serious technical support, stemming from its 17-year history, but it has no recent review data to gauge current support quality. Its support is reputed to be reliable, especially within Italy, but recent user feedback is unavailable for comparison.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's ecosystem surpasses 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment providers, CRMs, and more, with a vibrant marketplace enabling rapid integration of third-party tools. This vast network allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack with ease.
Persefone offers a fully integrated solution but has no publicly available data on third-party integrations or a marketplace. Its ecosystem is likely more closed, emphasizing stability over flexibility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.62/5 by 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness, automation, and excellent support, especially among boutique and city hotels. The high review count and recency indicate a vibrant, satisfied user base.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings published publicly, limiting the ability to gauge user satisfaction today. Its longstanding reputation suggests reliability, but it lacks current data to compare.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, reflecting its enterprise-level automation and extensive features, with no free tier or trial. Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200 per month, offering a more affordable but less detailed view of its pricing structure, which may include custom quotes for larger hotels.
While Mews’s higher price is justified by its advanced capabilities, Persefone’s lower cost could appeal to smaller or budget-conscious properties. Do your operational needs justify the investment in Mews’s wider capabilities?
Not ideal if your hotel primarily operates in Italy and prefers a traditional, locally supported system with deep regional customization.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid innovation, cloud-native features, or extensive third-party ecosystems.
Mews is a modern, cloud-native PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, supported by a large, active user base that reviews and updates regularly. Its extensive features and marketplace make it a flexible choice for hotels aiming to innovate and scale quickly.
Persefone offers a mature, comprehensive system rooted in Italy, with a focus on stability and all-in-one management, but lacks recent public reviews or a visible ecosystem of integrations. It’s better suited for hotels seeking a regional, stable platform rather than cutting-edge technology.
Choose Mews if your hotel values agility, automation, and a broad ecosystem, especially if you're planning to grow or modernize rapidly. Opt for Persefone if you prefer a long-established, regional solution with a focus on stability and deep feature integration, particularly within the Italian market.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Persefone compartilham 10 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados | ||
| Taxas personalizadas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 37 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Persefone compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 335 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Persefone oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Persefone: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Persefone tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos