The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Megasys se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do Megasys destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
Megasys |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Mews PMS and Portfolio HMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and market presence. Mews, with its vast global footprint and extensive review base, offers a proven track record, while Portfolio HMS remains less visible but may suit specific operational needs. Which platform aligns best with your hotel's scale and ambitions?
Mews PMS and Portfolio HMS serve different hotel segments and offer contrasting levels of market validation. Mews, launched in 2012 and based in the Netherlands, boasts a 99.53 score on HotelTechReport, with 758 reviews, including 98 recent ones from the last six months, giving it a strong, current reputation for reliability. Portfolio HMS, with no reviews or recent data, appears less established and lacks visible user feedback or case studies.
Mews provides a comprehensive, cloud-native platform designed for diverse property types—from boutique hotels to large chains—supporting scalability and integrations. Portfolio HMS, by contrast, advertises robust functionalities but offers no publicly available reviews or user insights to validate its claims. Do you prefer a vendor with proven customer satisfaction and ongoing support or a less documented system?
If your hotel needs a highly adaptable, scalable PMS with proven performance across multiple regions and hotel segments, Mews is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable if you prioritize extensive integrations, automation, and a modern user interface, backed by a large, active user community. Conversely, if your hotel’s needs are niche or you seek a system with potentially lower costs and fewer users, Portfolio HMS might be worth exploring, although the lack of reviews makes it hard to assess its suitability.
For hoteliers managing boutique properties, hostels, or small chains seeking a flexible cloud-based tool with proven support, Mews offers the confidence of extensive real-world validation. Larger operators looking for a mature platform with a broad partner ecosystem should favor Mews for its proven track record. If your hotel is smaller or prefers a less documented solution, Portfolio HMS might be appropriate, but the absence of reviews complicates validation.
Mews consistently earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.7 out of 5, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and strong support resources. Users appreciate its modern, visual design, which reduces training time and promotes staff adoption, even across multi-property portfolios.
Portfolio HMS, with no available reviews or feedback, cannot be confidently rated on usability. Its user interface, learning curve, and onboarding experience remain unknown, creating uncertainty for your team. Based on existing data, Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a feature set exceeding 59 unique functionalities, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, a booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Its open API and over 336 verified integrations enable customization and connection to a broad tech ecosystem.
Portfolio HMS’s feature list remains undisclosed, with no detailed comparison available. Without user reviews or case studies, it’s impossible to verify its capabilities or identify unique functionalities. Mews’s proven, extensive feature set provides a definitive edge.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support is rated 4.27 out of 5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, online support, and proactive onboarding. Many users remark, “Of course we've had to overcome a few barriers, but we're certain to have made the best decision in implementing Mews. Their support team sets new standards.”
Portfolio HMS offers no publicly available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Given Mews’s transparent support metrics and positive feedback, it clearly leads in customer support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts an ecosystem of 336 verified partners, including prominent integrations like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, along with over 1,000 options in its Marketplace. This extensive network enables your hotel to customize workflows, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Portfolio HMS, with zero verified integrations or partner data, cannot match Mews’s ecosystem. Its limited or undisclosed integration capabilities pose risks for scalability and modern operation needs. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s user ratings are notably high: 4.62 out of 5 overall, 4.7 for ease of use, and 4.27 for customer support, based on 758 reviews, with a recent 98 reviews in the last six months. Hoteliers praise its user-friendly design, flexibility, and continuous innovation.
In contrast, Portfolio HMS has no public reviews, ratings, or recent feedback. The absence of user data indicates less market validation and confidence. Clearly, hoteliers rate Mews higher by a large margin. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s base price is $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly advertised. Its transparent pricing model allows hotels to budget accordingly, though additional costs may apply for premium features.
Pricing for Portfolio HMS is not available, and the lack of a public pricing structure makes direct comparison impossible. The absence of clear costs suggests a need for direct vendor engagement, which adds uncertainty. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a comprehensive, well-established PMS backed by a large community of satisfied hoteliers. Its extensive features, proven support, and global presence make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and growth.
If your hotel needs a flexible, trusted platform with proven results and a broad ecosystem, go with Mews. It offers a clear advantage in support, integrations, and user satisfaction.
Choose Portfolio HMS only if your specific operational needs align precisely with its capabilities, and you are prepared to take on the risk of less validated technology. Its lack of reviews and support data makes it unsuitable for most hotels seeking proven reliability.
In summary, for most hoteliers aiming for a future-proof, scalable, and well-supported PMS, Mews is the definitive recommendation. It’s the choice that brings confidence, innovation, and proven success to your hotel’s management.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Megasys | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Portfolio HMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Portfolio HMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 335 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Portfolio HMS oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Portfolio HMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Megasys tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos