The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Sigh Ulyses se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do Sigh Ulyses destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Sigh Ulyses hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews is a comprehensive, cloud-native PMS with a proven track record, hosting over 750 reviews and a high rating of 4.62/5, indicating widespread satisfaction. Sigh Ulyses, by contrast, is an AI-driven review analysis platform with no reviews or ratings to date, making it difficult to assess its reliability or effectiveness for hotel management.
Mews’s extensive features and large user base suggest it’s a more mature and trusted solution for hotels seeking an integrated management system. Sigh Ulyses might serve niche needs like review sentiment analysis but lacks the operational depth that hoteliers require. So, which product truly meets your hotel’s core management needs?
Mews and Sigh Ulyses address fundamentally different challenges. Mews is designed to streamline daily hotel operations—from reservations to billing—through automation and robust integrations, with a focus on scalability and versatility. Sigh Ulyses concentrates on analyzing guest reviews and extracting insights, primarily suited for reputation management or customer feedback analysis.
While Mews’s reviews demonstrate consistent satisfaction across various hotel segments, Sigh Ulyses has no publicly available review data, making it impossible to gauge its impact or user experience. Do you need a reliable, full-featured PMS or a review analysis tool?
If your hotel’s priority is operational efficiency, guest management, and integration flexibility, Mews is the clear choice. Its platform supports a wide range of hotel types—from boutique properties to large chains—and offers over 336 verified integrations, including channel managers, POS, and revenue tools.
On the other hand, if your focus is on understanding and responding to customer sentiment, especially through review analysis, Sigh Ulyses might seem appealing. However, with zero reviews or proven user feedback, it’s untested at scale. For hotel management, Mews is the more reliable and proven solution, while Sigh Ulyses remains a speculative option for reputation insights.
Mews’s user interface is rated 4.7/5, with many reviews praising its modern, intuitive design. Onboarding is rated 4.39/5, and staff adoption is generally smooth, supported by extensive training resources and a cloud-based approach that allows remote access.
Sigh Ulyses scores no publicly available ratings, reviews, or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability or learning curve. Without concrete data, it’s safe to say Mews’s usability is well-established and trusted by hundreds of hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive suite of 59 exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping, online check-in, real-time reporting, automated reminders, and integrated payment processing. Its cloud-based system is PCI and GDPR compliant, with advanced tools for automating operational tasks and enhancing guest experiences.
Sigh Ulyses has no publicly listed features or comparable functionalities. It primarily provides AI-driven review summaries and actionable recommendations, but lacks the operational tools necessary for daily hotel management. Clearly, Mews’s feature set is far more suited for managing a hotel.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a customer support rating of 4.27/5, with many reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Its support team offers online, 24/7 assistance, and users appreciate the dedicated onboarding process, though some note occasional bugs that are promptly addressed.
Sigh Ulyses has no available support ratings or customer feedback. Given its minimal user base and lack of reviews, it’s impossible to gauge the quality or responsiveness of its support. For reliable assistance, Mews is the evident leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and guest engagement platforms. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable hotels to customize their tech ecosystem efficiently.
Sigh Ulyses has no verified integrations or partnerships publicly listed. It appears to be a standalone review analysis tool without direct operational integrations. For a hotel managing multiple systems, Mews’s integration ecosystem is significantly more advantageous.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.62/5 rating based on 758 reviews, including 98 in the last six months. Hotels across segments—from boutique and city center hotels to hostels and resorts—highlight its ease of use, automation, and support.
Sigh Ulyses has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Mews’s reviews, it’s clear that hoteliers favor Mews for operational management.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options available. Its cost reflects its extensive features and enterprise-grade integrations.
Sigh Ulyses does not provide publicly available pricing details or subscription models. Its lack of transparent pricing makes it hard to compare directly, but the absence of a proven track record suggests it may be more suited for specific, niche applications rather than full hotel management.
Mews offers a full-stack PMS with proven functionality, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction, making it suitable for hotels of all sizes looking to modernize operations. Its broad feature set, support, and market presence make it a safe, scalable choice for most hoteliers.
Sigh Ulyses, by contrast, appears narrowly focused on review analysis with no operational tools or proven hotel management capabilities. Its lack of reviews or user feedback suggests it’s untested at scale and unlikely to replace or complement a PMS for day-to-day hotel operations.
If you need an operational backbone that enhances efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue, Mews is the clear choice. For specialized reputation insights, consider Sigh Ulyses, but only as a supplementary tool—never as a primary management system.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Sigh Ulyses | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Sigh Ulyses compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Sigh Ulyses compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 335 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Sigh Ulyses oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Sigh Ulyses: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Sigh Ulyses tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos