The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 886 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Tokeet se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 886 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 886 | 0 |
Apos analisar 886 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, experiência de integração e suporte, enquanto os usuarios do Tokeet destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Experiência de integração e suporte
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Complexidade de faturamento e limitações de relatórios
▾
|
|
|
−
Gestão de Receitas
▾
|
|
|
−
Preços e taxas
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) tailored to your hotel’s needs can dramatically impact operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Mews PMS by Mews and Tokeet by Tokeet address different segments and business types, but their core functions differ significantly. Mews offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a proven track record in traditional hospitality, while Tokeet remains focused primarily on vacation rental management with limited global presence. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Mews and Tokeet serve distinct markets, with Mews directly targeting traditional hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and resorts. Tokeet primarily caters to vacation rental operators and property managers managing multiple short-term rentals. While Mews’s platform is built to handle complex operations, integrations, and guest experiences at larger scales, Tokeet emphasizes ease of management for rental portfolios, often with less extensive automation or hospitality-specific features. Do you need a full-scale hotel PMS or a rental management tool?
Mews boasts a solid reputation backed by 758 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.62/5, reflecting strong customer satisfaction and ongoing innovation. In contrast, Tokeet has no recent reviews or rating data, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction or platform robustness. Are you willing to rely on a product with proven recent performance, or are you exploring a less tested solution?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform capable of managing reservations, front desk operations, revenue management, guest communication, and extensive integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Its advanced modules, including booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping, and automation tools, make it suitable for independent hotels, boutique properties, and larger chains aiming for operational control and guest-centric features.
However, if your property operates as a vacation rental or manages multiple short-term rentals with a focus on channel management and automated invoicing, Tokeet might be more appropriate—though its limited reviews and market presence suggest less proven scalability for full-service hotels. For hoteliers seeking a comprehensive, modern PMS, Mews’s depth and recent positive feedback are decisive.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface, and quick onboarding. Users frequently note that staff can adapt rapidly thanks to its user-friendly design, and onboarding is described as smooth, with a support team that assists effectively.
Tokeet, however, has no recent review data available, leaving its user experience and onboarding process less transparent. Without recent feedback, it’s harder to assess how easily new users can adopt the platform or how well it integrates into daily hotel operations. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an impressive suite of 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, multi-currency management, revenue and rate management modules, integrated CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, task management, guest messaging, digital registration, and a host of operational tools like housekeeper modules, real-time reporting, and integrated payment solutions.
Tokeet’s feature set appears more limited, focusing on core vacation rental functions such as booking management, channel management, invoicing, and guest communication, but it lacks the extensive modules found in Mews. For a hotel with complex needs and growth plans, Mews’s feature count and specialized modules give it a decisive edge.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a customer support rating of 4.27/5, with reviews highlighting its support team's responsiveness, especially during implementation. Customers appreciate the proactive support, with some describing their onboarding as “smooth” and support agents as “helpful,” even when troubleshooting bugs or system issues.
Tokeet, lacking recent reviews and support ratings, provides no recent data to compare. The limited feedback suggests less transparency and confidence in support quality. For a hotel that values reliable, responsive assistance, Mews’s support reputation is clearly superior.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, with integrations spanning channel managers, payment providers, CRS, revenue management, and more. Its extensive ecosystem includes shared partners like ChargeAutomation and HKeeper, plus over 1,000 marketplace integrations, allowing for a highly customizable tech stack.
Tokeet has just 3 verified integrations, including major vacation rental channels like Airbnb, Booking.com, and VRBO. While suitable for rental properties, this limited number restricts a hotel’s ability to connect to broader hotel management tools. For multi-channel, multi-system setups, Mews’s robust integration network offers a commanding advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings—4.62/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend—show strong user satisfaction across diverse property types, from boutique hotels to hostels and resorts. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and innovative features, with many noting measurable operational improvements.
Tokeet, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no recent user feedback, making it impossible to determine current hotel satisfaction or performance. Given the data, Mews clearly holds the higher rating among hotel clients.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's pricing starts at $900/month, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees noted. Its pricing structure reflects a comprehensive platform suited to hotels seeking advanced features and extensive integrations.
Tokeet does not publicly disclose pricing details, which suggests it may have a more opaque or customized pricing approach—possibly more suited to small rental portfolios than larger hotels. For transparency and value for money, Mews’s predictable pricing is preferable.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews stands out as the more established, feature-rich, and well-rated platform, with recent reviews reinforcing its value and ongoing innovation. It’s best suited for hotels that demand operational depth, automation, and seamless integrations, especially as they scale.
Tokeet, while effective for vacation rentals and simple property management, lacks recent feedback and the extensive feature set necessary for full-service hotels. It’s best for small operators or rental portfolios that need basic automation and OTA connectivity.
If you want a proven, comprehensive PMS with recent positive reviews, go with Mews. For managing a rental-focused portfolio with minimal needs, Tokeet could suffice, but its limited hotel-specific capabilities make it less suitable for larger or traditional hotels.
In conclusion, Mews’s recent reviews, extensive features, and broad integrations make it the stronger choice for most hotels looking to modernize their operations and elevate guest experiences.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Tokeet compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
A experiência de integração com o Mews tem sido inconsistente, com alguns usuários elogiando a abordagem prática, enquanto outros enfrentaram dificuld... A experiência de integração com o Mews tem sido inconsistente, com alguns usuários elogiando a abordagem prática, enquanto outros enfrentaram dificuldades com a eficiência da configuração inicial. A capacidade de resposta da equipe de suporte melhorou ao longo do tempo, aprimorando a resolução de problemas e a satisfação do usuário.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Embora o Mews automatize a cobrança, os usuários relatam dificuldades com sua complexidade e limitações em termos de relatórios e análises. Aprimorar... Embora o Mews automatize a cobrança, os usuários relatam dificuldades com sua complexidade e limitações em termos de relatórios e análises. Aprimorar essas áreas poderia proporcionar melhores insights e maior flexibilidade para os usuários que gerenciam as operações financeiras.
A Mews oferece uma base sólida para a gestão de receitas com seus recursos de integração, mas os usuários indicam oportunidades de melhoria nas ferram... A Mews oferece uma base sólida para a gestão de receitas com seus recursos de integração, mas os usuários indicam oportunidades de melhoria nas ferramentas de precificação dinâmica e em análises avançadas, especialmente em operações com múltiplas propriedades.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Tokeet compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 336 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Tokeet oferece 3. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Tokeet: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Tokeet tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos