The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and TTLock hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and guest experience goals. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, provides a comprehensive property management system designed to streamline operations from booking to check-out, while TTLock specializes in access control solutions, primarily focusing on smart lock technology with no recent reviews or ratings. How do these tools align with your hotel’s priorities?
Mews's extensive feature set and proven market presence make it a clear leader for hotels seeking an all-in-one PMS. TTLock’s narrow focus on keyless entry and access solutions may suit properties prioritizing smart lock integration but lacks the broader hotel management functionalities you likely need.
Mews PMS functions as a full-scale property management platform, supporting reservations, billing, guest communications, housekeeping, revenue management, and integrations. TTLock, on the other hand, zeroes in on electronic lock solutions, offering mobile access, key management, and access control hardware, but without integrated PMS features.
Given Mews's 99.5+ score backed by 98 recent reviews—many emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support—it’s clear that Mews is the more mature, broadly adopted solution. In contrast, TTLock’s reviews are nonexistent or outdated, making it difficult to assess its suitability or reliability. Which solution best addresses your need for operational efficiency?
If your hotel requires a fully integrated PMS that automates reservations, billing, guest management, and reporting, go with Mews. Its extensive feature library—including multi-lingual support, revenue management, and online check-in—makes it ideal for modern, scalable hotels seeking operational clarity.
If your primary goal is to implement smart lock access control for guest rooms or facilities, TTLock might be appealing, especially if you already have a dedicated PMS. However, with no recent reviews or market data, TTLock’s reliability and support are uncertain, and it should be considered only as a hardware accessory rather than a management system.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by detailed onboarding and a user-friendly interface that many reviews praise for requiring minimal staff training. Its cloud-native design allows staff to manage operations remotely, with an intuitive dashboard that simplifies complex workflows.
TTLock’s user experience remains undocumented in recent reviews, and its hardware-centric approach typically involves separate management apps and devices. Without substantial user feedback, it's safe to say Mews offers a more straightforward, well-supported user journey.
Edge: Mews
Mews boasts over 59 exclusive features, including multi-currency support, a booking engine, guest CRM, integrated revenue management, automated night audit, and a mobile app—all designed to cover every aspect of hotel management in one platform. Its extensive integrations—over 336 verified partners—support a highly customizable tech ecosystem.
TTLock’s features are limited to electronic lock management—smart key issuance, remote access, and hardware controls—lacking the broad operational functionalities needed by hotels. With no comparable feature count or recent active development, Mews clearly leads in feature richness.
Edge: Mews
Mews support scores 4.27/5, with many recent reviews highlighting prompt, helpful assistance and a positive onboarding experience. Users appreciate the support team’s responsiveness, especially during implementation and troubleshooting.
TTLock’s support record is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to assess the quality of customer service or technical support. Given the complexity of hotel operations, reliable support is critical—favoring Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment providers, revenue tools, and more—enabling a seamless, connected tech environment tailored to hotel needs. TTLock offers hardware and app integrations focused solely on access control, with only one verified partner, limiting its ecosystem.
For hotels seeking a flexible and expandable platform, Mews’s extensive integrations make it the superior choice. TTLock’s narrow scope doesn’t address broader operational requirements.
Edge: Mews
With 98 recent reviews and an overall score of 4.62/5, hoteliers consistently praise Mews for its ease of use, automation capabilities, and support. Many mention significant time savings, better guest experiences, and a high level of customization.
TTLock has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotelier satisfaction. The absence of feedback indicates a lack of proven, real-world hotel adoption—favoring Mews’s established reputation.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers a straightforward pricing model starting at $900/month, with no implementation or hidden fees, making cost transparency easier to evaluate. TTLock’s pricing is not publicly available, and since it’s primarily hardware-focused, cost depends on lock hardware and integration setup—often requiring separate investments.
For hotels seeking predictable expenses and clear value, Mews’s transparent pricing stands out. TTLock’s costs are less transparent and hardware-dependent, which can complicate budgeting.
Mews’s core distinction lies in being a full-featured property management system trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, with a proven track record of enhancing operational efficiency. TTLock focuses exclusively on smart lock hardware and access control, lacking the breadth needed for comprehensive hotel management.
If your hotel needs a single platform to manage reservations, billing, guest communications, and revenue, Mews is the clear choice. TTLock is suited only for properties seeking advanced keyless entry solutions without a broader management system.
Choose Mews when you value operational integration, automation, and proven support—especially since it commands a much larger share of recent reviews and user satisfaction. Opt for TTLock only if smart access control is your sole focus and your management system is handled elsewhere.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating property management solutions, Mews offers a complete, well-supported, and highly rated platform, making it the recommended choice over TTLock’s niche hardware solutions.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e TTLock compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e TTLock compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 335 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto TTLock oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. TTLock: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos