The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Uplisting se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do Uplisting destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
You’re choosing between Mews PMS and Uplisting for your hotel’s property management needs. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they serve different segments and offer contrasting features. Mews, with its extensive reviews and recent data, is the clear leader, demonstrating a proven track record in hospitality.
Are you looking for a versatile, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem, or a specialized tool tailored for short-term rentals? The choice hinges on your property type and operational priorities.
Mews is a cloud-based platform designed for a wide range of accommodations, including boutique hotels, resorts, and branded properties. It offers over 750 reviews—98 in the last six months—indicating active, recent user engagement. Its overall rating of 4.62/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend highlight strong hotelier satisfaction.
Uplisting, on the other hand, caters primarily to short-term rental operators and has no publicly available reviews or ratings. Its focus is narrower, lacking the extensive user feedback and proven track record that Mews demonstrates. Given the recent surge of positive reviews for Mews, it clearly has the more established reputation.
Does Uplisting’s niche focus make it suitable for small rental operations? The answer is no; without recent reviews or ratings, its reliability remains unverified compared to Mews’ proven performance in the hotel industry.
If your hotel needs a robust, adaptable property management system that can handle diverse property types, automation, and integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set and unmatched third-party ecosystem are ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking scalability.
If your operation is purely short-term rentals or vacation homes, and you prioritize simplicity over advanced features, Uplisting might seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews and a small user base make it a less reliable choice for hotels that require proven, comprehensive PMS capabilities.
Ultimately, for hotels seeking a reliable, enterprise-grade system with proven support and a large ecosystem, Mews is the better option. Uplisting’s limited data and niche focus make it less suitable for traditional hotel operations.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with a modern, intuitive interface praised by 758 reviewers, including many recent ones. Users report quick onboarding—averaging 4.39/5—and highlight how staff adopt the system smoothly, citing features like mobile apps and user-friendly dashboards.
Uplisting offers a simpler, less feature-rich interface tailored to short-term rental hosts, but lacks extensive user ratings or detailed feedback on usability. Its minimal public data makes it difficult to assess how easy it is for teams to adopt at scale.
Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-language, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, direct billing, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Its 336 verified integrations also enable extensive customization.
Uplisting offers core management functions suitable for small rental portfolios but lacks the breadth of features found in Mews. It does not have a comparable ecosystem or advanced modules like revenue management, guest profiles, or automation tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and availability, including 98 recent reviews in the last six months. Users appreciate the proactive onboarding, quick bug resolutions, and comprehensive assistance.
Uplisting offers no public support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge its support quality. Its small user base suggests limited support resources, especially compared to Mews’ established global presence.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like Duve, PriceLabs, Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its extensive API and marketplace enable hoteliers to connect a wide array of third-party tools.
Uplisting has only 2 verified partners, which severely limits its integration capabilities. For hotels relying on a broad tech ecosystem, this stark difference makes Mews the clear leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews, with over 750 reviews—98 recent—has a 4.62/5 overall rating, with 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotelier feedback covers diverse segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels, all expressing satisfaction with its functionality and support.
Uplisting lacks publicly available reviews or ratings, preventing a similar assessment. Its unverified reputation means hotel managers cannot confidently rely on its performance or support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews costs a base fee of $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. Its pricing model is transparent, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Uplisting offers no publicly disclosed pricing, but as a smaller platform, it likely charges less for basic management. However, the lack of clear pricing details hampers direct comparison and confidence.
Overall, Mews’ transparent pricing aligns with its proven, extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if your operation is purely short-term rentals with minimal complexity or if you prioritize a niche platform.
Not ideal if you manage diverse properties, need advanced features, or require proven hotel-specific support and scalability.
Mews excels as a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and active hotelier support. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it the trusted choice for most hotel operations, especially those seeking growth and scalability.
Uplisting may appeal to small, niche rental operators prioritizing simplicity, but its lack of recent reviews and small ecosystem make it less reliable for hotels. For properties that need a dependable, comprehensive solution, Mews remains the clear winner.
If your hotel requires a proven, adaptable PMS with robust features, support, and integrations—choose Mews. If you operate a small vacation rental and prefer a minimal management system, Uplisting could suffice, but be cautious about its unverified support and capabilities.
Edge: Mews.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Uplisting | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Uplisting compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Uplisting compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 336 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Uplisting oferece 2. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Uplisting: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Uplisting tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos