The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 23 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
PXP se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
roommaster se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Splitting.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 23 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 23 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de processamento de pagamentos para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 6 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 7 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #4 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | — | #4 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avaliacoes |
| Luxo | — | #5 0 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | — | #4 1 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #4 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #4 14 avaliacoes |
| Europa | — | #5 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #3 0 avaliacoes |
Both PXP by PXP and roommaster Payments aim to streamline hotel payment processes, but they approach this goal from different angles. PXP offers a comprehensive payment platform with multiple payment options and global reach, while roommaster Payments focuses on deep integration within your existing property management system (PMS) to reduce manual work and improve operational efficiency. How do these differences impact your hotel’s specific needs?
PXP’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating suggest it’s unproven in current hotel environments, whereas roommaster’s more recent feedback and higher customer support scores indicate a more reliable choice. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
While PXP promises a broad set of features and multiple payment options, it lacks recent user feedback and a clear satisfaction record. roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews in the past six months and an NPS score of 8.4/10, demonstrates higher customer satisfaction and ongoing support. Given the importance of reliable support in payments processing, roommaster is the stronger choice at this moment.
In terms of overall ratings and recent review activity, roommaster Payments far exceeds PXP. Its ease of use, customer support, and positive hotel segment ratings make it the more dependable option for your hotel today.
PXP and roommaster Payments both promise to simplify payments, but they serve different hotel profiles. PXP provides a global, multi-channel payment ecosystem with extensive payment method support, ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs multi-currency settlement options like DCC and accepts diverse payment methods including Apple Pay, Paypal, and American Express.
roommaster Payments, on the other hand, is designed for hotels wanting seamless integration within their PMS, with features like deposit handling, pre-authorizations, and dispute resolution built into the system. If your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, automated reconciliation, and reducing manual workload, roommaster is more suitable.
However, PXP’s lack of recent user reviews and an overall 0/5 rating make it difficult to recommend confidently. Do you need a proven, well-supported system, or are you prepared to navigate potential instability with a less-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a proven, support-rich system with a strong hotel user base and recent positive reviews, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 recent reviews in the last six months and an 8.4/10 NPS demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction and reliable support—crucial for payment systems.
If, however, your hotel requires a payment platform with diverse payment options supporting global currencies and multiple processors, PXP might seem appealing. But given the absence of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, its long-term reliability is questionable. For most hotels, especially those prioritizing stability and support, roommaster Payments is the safer choice.
roommaster Payments scores a high 4.4/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its straightforward integration and intuitive interface. Users highlight that support staff like Aladdein are helpful and resolve issues promptly, reflecting a strong support team.
In contrast, PXP’s interface and usability are unverified, and no recent reviews or ratings are available to confirm its user-friendliness. Given the critical importance of smooth payment workflows, roommaster’s more recent positive feedback makes it the clear winner here.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP offers 13 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, DCC, Google Pay, Apple Pay, Paypal, American Express acceptance, and multiple processor gateways. These features cater well to international hotels or properties needing flexible, multi-channel payment options.
roommaster Payments provides only one exclusive feature—payment splitting—but covers core hotel payment needs effectively, including deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management, with a focus on automation and integration. If you want a broader array of payment methods, PXP has the edge; if operational workflows matter more, roommaster’s features are sufficient.
Edge: PXP
roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating and recent reviews citing helpful, knowledgeable staff willing to resolve issues quickly. Comments like “they answer my calls and help resolve issues in a timely manner” reinforce the perception of reliable support.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for PXP, but its overall lack of feedback and a 0/5 rating cast doubt on its support quality. For critical payment operations, dependable support is essential, making roommaster Payments the superior choice.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments boasts 56 verified partners, including major property management and hospitality systems like Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric, along with shared integrations with Oracle Hospitality and Canary Technologies. This broad ecosystem supports extensive operational connectivity.
PXP has only 7 verified partners, with some notable integrations like Canary Technologies and Profitroom but far fewer overall. For hotels that rely on multiple integrated systems or plan to expand integrations, roommaster’s larger partner network offers more flexibility.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments has a recent, high NPS score of 8.4/10 based on 20 reviews, with hotel segments like resorts and independent hotels giving positive feedback on support and ease of use. Its recent review activity signals current relevance and satisfaction.
PXP, on the other hand, has a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews, making it impossible to determine user sentiment. Given the importance of user satisfaction for ongoing support, roommaster’s higher recent ratings hold considerable weight.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP’s pricing is not explicitly listed, but it appears to be a base fee of $100 with no mention of additional charges. roommaster Payments charges a base price of $300, with no mention of implementation fees or monthly per-room charges.
In absence of detailed PXP pricing, roommaster’s transparent flat fee provides clarity. If cost predictability is essential, roommaster’s straightforward pricing model is preferable.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a proven, support-driven platform, or if you prefer a system with recent reviews and high user satisfaction.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a broad array of payment methods or operates in multiple countries with complex international requirements.
The core difference lies in support and proven reliability. roommaster Payments is a well-supported, recent, and highly rated solution tailored for operational efficiency, whereas PXP’s limited recent feedback, unverified usability, and fewer integrations suggest it’s a less stable choice.
Choose roommaster Payments if your priority is support, ease of use, and recent positive hotel feedback. Its extensive integrations and proven track record make it a safer, more dependable option for most properties.
Opt for PXP only if your hotel needs its specific features like multi-currency settlements and diverse payment options, and you’re prepared to accept higher risk due to limited recent review data.
In summary, roommaster Payments currently stands out as the more reliable, well-supported payment platform, especially for hotels seeking operational stability and support. PXP may appeal to highly international or technologically advanced properties, but its unproven recent standing makes it a riskier option.
Os precos de Software de processamento de pagamentos raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, PXP e roommaster Payments compartilham 12 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aceita Apple Pay | ||
| Aceita Google Pay | ||
| Aceita Paypal | ||
| Conversão dinâmica de moeda (DCC) | ||
| Divisão de pagamento | ||
| Liquidações em várias moedas | ||
| Pagamentos recorrentes |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 2 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Capacidades exclusivas
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. PXP e roommaster Payments compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Payments Processing Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. PXP oferece 7 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto roommaster Payments oferece 56. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. roommaster Payments lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
PXP: Nao. roommaster Payments: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Payments Processing Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. PXP tem um HT Score de 0 e roommaster tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos