The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
RoomStay se destaca .
SiteMinder se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.3/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Performance Reporting and Urgency messaging.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 1,332 |
Apos analisar 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do RoomStay mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do SiteMinder destacam channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, desafios no suporte ao cliente. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 470 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 527 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 96 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #1 50 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 564 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #1 411 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #1 230 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 174 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #2 157 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #5 266 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #1 418 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #3 13 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both RoomStay by RoomStay and SiteMinder Booking Engine aim to boost direct bookings, but they approach this goal differently. While RoomStay emphasizes a personalized booking process with AI-driven insights, SiteMinder offers a comprehensive, globally-connected platform with extensive features. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Are you prioritizing ease of use and proven global distribution? Or are you seeking tailored guest experiences and AI-powered insights? Let’s compare.
RoomStay and SiteMinder both aim to increase direct bookings and improve revenue management, but they diverge significantly in their approach. RoomStay, a newer platform founded in 2020, targets hotels eager to enhance their e-commerce checkouts with AI-driven analytics and personalized experiences. It offers a simple, personalized booking interface but lacks the extensive feature set of SiteMinder.
SiteMinder, established in 2006, focuses on connectivity and distribution, integrating with over 245 partners, including major OTAs and PMS systems. Its booking engine is designed for hotels seeking a robust, scalable system that manages multiple channels efficiently. While SiteMinder’s feature-rich platform supports advanced revenue management and analytics, RoomStay’s core strength lies in its simplicity and AI insights.
Given the stark difference in review volume and recency—SiteMinder boasts over 1,200 recent reviews with a 4.48/5 rating, while RoomStay has no reviews and a 0/5 score—SiteMinder’s platform is clearly more tested and trusted. Do you want a proven, widely adopted solution or an emerging platform focused on AI-driven personalization?
If your hotel needs a mature, globally-connected booking engine that offers extensive integrations, automated distribution, and channel management, SiteMinder is the clear choice. It’s ideal for hotels that operate multiple properties or require reliable, scalable distribution across 96 countries, with over 245 verified partners.
Conversely, if your team is looking for a straightforward, AI-supported booking system that emphasizes custom guest experiences and conversion optimization—especially if you’re a smaller or boutique property—RoomStay could appeal. Its focus on personalized booking flows might work well if you prioritize guest experience over complex distribution.
With more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, SiteMinder’s platform is more reliable for larger operations. RoomStay’s innovation might suit hotels with niche needs, but it’s less proven at scale.
SiteMinder consistently receives high marks for ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating based on over 1,200 reviews. Users praise its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and minimal staff training required, often citing quick setup and smooth operation. Many hotel teams find it simple to manage multiple channels and integrate with their PMS.
RoomStay, with no user ratings available, offers a more limited picture. Its platform likely focuses on ease, but the absence of reviews means you can’t gauge user satisfaction or onboarding effectiveness. Given SiteMinder’s long-standing reputation for user-friendly design and comprehensive support, it edges out RoomStay.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder provides an extensive suite of features—over 37 unique functionalities—including room & rate filtering, performance reporting, rate intelligence, channel self-mapping, loyalty integrations, and multi-currency support. Its open API and PMS connectivity enable deep customization and automation.
RoomStay offers only two shared features with SiteMinder but does not include any exclusive features. Its core value proposition centers on personalized booking experiences and AI-driven review summaries, lacking advanced tools like rate comparison, yield management, or multi-channel automation.
Given the broader, more mature feature set, SiteMinder clearly has the edge for hotels seeking a full-fledged distribution and revenue management platform.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s support scores high, with a 4.43/5 rating and numerous reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Clients report that support answers inquiries promptly, often within hours, and provides effective onboarding and troubleshooting.
RoomStay, lacking review data, offers no clear insights into its customer support quality. Its recent absence of reviews suggests it is less proven in this area, especially at scale.
For hotels that value dependable, responsive support, SiteMinder’s established reputation makes it the safer choice.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder delivers over 245 verified integrations, including major PMS, payment gateways, and OTAs. Its extensive partner network enables seamless data flow, real-time updates, and operational automation, reducing manual work and errors.
RoomStay integrates with only 7 verified partners, including Triptease, Stripe, and RMS, with only one exclusive partner—Adyen. Its limited integration options restrict its ability to connect with other systems, which could hinder scalability.
For extensive connectivity and a broad partner network, SiteMinder’s platform is far superior.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s recent review count and ratings (4.48/5 from 1,207 reviews, many within the last 6 months) indicate high satisfaction across diverse hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and resorts. Hotels consistently praise its reliability, ease of use, and support.
RoomStay, with no reviews, cannot be rated or compared on user satisfaction. Its lack of feedback makes it impossible to gauge real-world performance.
Given the volume and recency of positive reviews, SiteMinder’s platform is clearly favored by hoteliers.
Edge: SiteMinder.
RoomStay offers no publicly available pricing information; it appears to be a custom, tailored solution, likely with variable costs based on scope.
SiteMinder charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no additional implementation or per-room charges. Its transparent pricing model makes budgeting easier, especially for hotels seeking predictable expenses.
If you prefer a clear, upfront cost, SiteMinder’s pricing is straightforward; RoomStay’s costs are less transparent.
SiteMinder’s platform is a well-established, feature-rich solution that offers the most reliable, scalable, and globally-supported booking engine. Its extensive integrations, proven support, and high user satisfaction make it the recommended choice for most hotels looking to maximize distribution and operational efficiency.
RoomStay appeals to niche markets focused on personalized guest experiences and AI insights, but its lack of reviews and limited feature set make it less suitable for larger or more complex operations. Its simplicity might work for boutique properties seeking a straightforward booking tool but falls short of the robustness required by most hotels.
If your hotel demands proven reliability, extensive connectivity, and comprehensive functionality, SiteMinder is the clear winner. For innovative, small-scale applications, RoomStay could have potential, but it remains unproven compared to its competitor.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Roomstay e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham 2 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API aberta | ||
| Comparação da tarifa do quarto | ||
| Filtragem de tipo de quarto e tarifa | ||
| Filtros de compras de taxa rápida | ||
| Relatório de desempenho | ||
| Taxa de inteligência |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 25 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Roomstay e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Roomstay oferece 7 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto SiteMinder Booking Engine oferece 245. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. SiteMinder Booking Engine lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Roomstay: Nao. SiteMinder Booking Engine: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. RoomStay tem um HT Score de 0 e SiteMinder tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos