The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
SS&C se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do SS&C destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and TimeShareWare by SS&C hinges on your hotel’s unique operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews specializes in modern, cloud-based property management for diverse accommodation types, emphasizing automation, guest experience, and third-party integrations. Conversely, TimeShareWare targets resort and shared-ownership management, with a focus on detailed asset oversight, financial management, and multi-site operations for larger or specialized property portfolios. So, which system aligns better with your hotel's strategic goals?
Mews and SS&C serve different hospitality niches, with Mews primarily designed for hotels, hostels, and boutique properties seeking streamlined operations and enhanced guest experiences. SS&C’s platform is tailored for larger resorts, timeshare operators, and property managers prioritizing complex financial management and multi-location oversight. While Mews offers over 1,000 integrations, SS&C emphasizes detailed asset and lease management. Do your operational challenges lean more toward guest service automation or comprehensive asset oversight?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-native PMS that simplifies reservations, automates check-ins, and improves guest communication, go with Mews. Its user-friendly interface, recent surge in positive reviews, and broad regional presence (covering 54 countries) make it suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains. If your property operates multiple resorts, manages extensive lease portfolios, or requires detailed financial and asset management across sites, SS&C’s TimeShareWare offers robust tools tailored for complex, multi-site resort management. For smaller hotels seeking modern guest-centric features, Mews is the clear choice; for large, multi-resort portfolios, SS&C’s solution may be better suited.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating backed by 758 recent reviews, with users emphasizing its intuitive, modern interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training needs. Many reviewers highlight how staff adopt Mews rapidly, praising its sleek design and straightforward workflows. In contrast, SS&C’s platform has no publicly available usability ratings, and its complexity suggests a steeper learning curve, especially for smaller hotels or teams unfamiliar with enterprise-level software. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive suite of 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, a booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, mobile app, automated night audit, and dynamic revenue management. It also includes innovative tools like digital registration, guest messaging, and real-time reporting. SS&C’s solution centers on lease and financial management, with a focus on accounting, lease tracking, and asset oversight but fewer guest-focused features. For functionalities that enhance guest experiences and operational agility, Mews holds the advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support team is generally rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising their quick response times and proactive assistance, although some users mention occasional bugs. Many describe the support as responsive and helpful during onboarding and troubleshooting. SS&C’s customer support details are less transparent; with no recent reviews or ratings, it’s difficult to assess their responsiveness. Given Mews’s active review base and high support ratings, it’s the more reliable choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified partners, with common integrations like Whistle, Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, enabling extensive customization and automation. Its open API and Marketplace facilitate connecting with revenue management, POS, and other third-party tools. SS&C’s platform has only a single verified partner, limiting its ecosystem flexibility. For hotels seeking a highly connected system that adapts to diverse operational needs, Mews’s ecosystem is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 is supported by 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers across boutique, city center, and hostel segments praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Smaller and independent properties especially rate it highly for streamlining daily operations and enhancing guest satisfaction. SS&C has no publicly available reviews or recent user feedback, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Based on current data, Mews’s reputation is significantly stronger. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 monthly, with no free tier or trial, and charges for implementation and setup are included in the base fee. SS&C does not publicly disclose pricing; typically, enterprise solutions like theirs involve custom quotes based on property size and scope. Overall, Mews provides transparent pricing, which is accessible for small and mid-sized hotels. SS&C’s costs likely target larger organizations with complex needs but lack transparency for smaller hoteliers.
Mews offers a modern, user-friendly platform that excels in automating guest experiences, integrating with third-party tools, and supporting diverse accommodation types. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it a clear leader for small to mid-sized hotels seeking operational agility and guest satisfaction. SS&C’s platform is targeted toward larger resorts or property management firms needing detailed financial and asset management but comes with less transparency and a steeper learning curve.
If your hotel values ease of use, rapid deployment, and a broad ecosystem, choose Mews. Its proven track record across multiple segments and regions makes it the safer, more adaptable choice. However, if you operate a large resort or resort portfolio requiring intricate lease and financial management, SS&C may better meet your strategic needs—though at the cost of simplicity and flexibility for daily hotel operations.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a reliable, scalable, and modern PMS, Mews is the stronger choice. It’s built to serve the evolving needs of today’s hospitality landscape with proven reviews and recent updates that support your team’s growth and guest satisfaction.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e TimeShareWare compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e TimeShareWare compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 336 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto TimeShareWare oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. TimeShareWare: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 99 e SS&C tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos