Autoclerk (PMS) vs. Shiji Daylight PMS:
Welches ist das Richtige für Sie?

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel's operations, guest experiences, and revenue. Both AutoClerk and Shiji Daylight aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in scope, support, and market presence. AutoClerk specializes in independent hotels and small chains with a focus on ease of use, while Shiji caters to larger hotel groups with extensive features and integrations. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?

Is AutoClerk or Shiji Daylight Better for Hotels?

AutoClerk offers a straightforward, cloud-based PMS designed primarily for small to mid-sized independent properties and chains. Its core strengths lie in ease of setup, simple interface, and robust customer support, evidenced by a high ease-of-use rating (4.33/5) and support rating (4.33/5). However, with only three reviews and an overall rating of 3.5/5, its user data lacks recent depth.

In contrast, Shiji Daylight provides a comprehensive, modern PMS built for hotels of all sizes, especially larger chains and branded hotels. Its user-friendly design (rating 4.63/5) and extensive feature set (98 features) appeal to hotels seeking automation, detailed reporting, and multi-property management. The platform’s 32 reviews, all recent with an average rating of 4/5, suggest a more active user base and ongoing improvements. Do you prioritize simplicity or advanced features?

AutoClerk vs Shiji Daylight: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is an independent property or small chain looking for a straightforward, easy-to-implement PMS with reliable support, AutoClerk is the logical choice. Its intuitive design and quick onboarding make it ideal for teams that value simplicity and support over extensive customization.

Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger group or plans to scale, Shiji Daylight’s 98 features—including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, and integrated revenue management—offer more depth. Its trusted reputation among large chains and comprehensive integrations make it suitable for hotels seeking automation and operational consistency across multiple properties.

Is AutoClerk or Shiji Daylight Easier to Use?

AutoClerk boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.33/5, with reviews highlighting its simple, user-friendly interface and ease of learning. Support is rated equally high, with users praising 24/7 assistance and quick resolution times, often describing it as “easy to learn and teach.” However, some note its interface could benefit from a more modern design.

Shiji Daylight edges slightly ahead with a 4.63/5 ease-of-use rating, supported by reviews emphasizing intuitive navigation, accessible training materials, and smooth daily operations. Hotels frequently mention its straightforward setup and minimal training time, making onboarding seamless. Edge: Shiji Daylight.

Which Has Better Features: AutoClerk or Shiji Daylight?

AutoClerk offers core property management functions, including reservations, guest profiles, and basic reporting. It provides integrated revenue management and web booking but lacks many advanced features found in Shiji.

Shiji Daylight, with 98 features, surpasses AutoClerk across the board. Unique capabilities include multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, guest messaging, digital registration, housekeeping modules, automated reminders, and comprehensive integrations like CRS, payment terminals, and channel managers. Its feature depth supports complex operations and automation. Edge: Shiji Daylight.

Which Has Better Customer Support: AutoClerk or Shiji Daylight?

AutoClerk’s customer support is highly rated (4.33/5), with reviewers appreciating its 24/7 availability and prompt, effective resolution of issues. One reviewer called support “extremely good at returning calls and resolving problems,” indicating a high level of reliability.

Shiji Daylight also garners strong support ratings (4.53/5), with users praising the professionalism and responsiveness of the support team. Multiple reviews highlight the ease of contacting support and the helpfulness of assistance, which facilitates smoother hotel operations. Edge: Shiji Daylight.

Which Has More Integrations: AutoClerk or Shiji Daylight?

AutoClerk integrates with eight verified partners, including notable solutions like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn. Its limited number of integrations may restrict connectivity to other systems you rely on.

Shiji Daylight, with 64 verified partners—including integrations with Bookboost, Revinate, Amadeus, and Atomize—offers a broader ecosystem. Its extensive integration options allow your hotel to connect seamlessly with various POS, CRM, revenue management, and distribution tools, making it ideal for larger, multi-system hotels. Edge: Shiji Daylight.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: AutoClerk or Shiji Daylight?

AutoClerk’s limited review base (3 reviews, none recent) results in an overall rating of 3.5/5, with some users citing simplicity but also noting reporting limitations. Its one positive review calls support “extremely good,” but the lack of recent reviews reduces confidence in ongoing support quality.

Shiji Daylight, rated by 32 recent reviews, achieves an overall score of 4/5. Hoteliers appreciate its user-friendly design, robust features, and support, with comments like “support team is always available” and “easy to learn for new staff.” Given the more recent and numerous reviews, Shiji’s higher rating reflects current user satisfaction. Edge: Shiji Daylight.

How Much Do AutoClerk and Shiji Daylight Cost?

AutoClerk does not publicly list pricing, which suggests a bespoke quote based on hotel size and needs. Its lack of transparency might be a barrier for smaller hotels with tight budgets.

Shiji Daylight starts at $1,200 per month, with no free trial or freemium option. This upfront cost reflects its extensive feature set and enterprise-level capabilities, making it more suitable for larger properties willing to invest in a comprehensive system.

What Type of Hotel Should Use AutoClerk?

• Hotels that operate independently or are small to medium-sized, needing a simple, reliable PMS.
• Teams that prioritize ease of onboarding and support over extensive customization.
• Properties with limited IT resources or smaller budgets.
• Resorts or boutique hotels seeking straightforward reservation and guest management.

Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced automation, detailed reporting, or multi-property management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Daylight?

• Hotels of all sizes, especially large chains or properties managing multiple locations.
• Teams needing extensive automation, integrations, and detailed reporting.
• Hotels aiming for a unified guest profile across properties to enhance personalization.
• Properties seeking scalable solutions that grow with their operations.

Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, low-cost system with minimal features or operates primarily in regions with limited localization needs.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

AutoClerk offers a basic, user-friendly PMS best suited for small hotels and independents seeking straightforward management. Its high support ratings and ease of use make it a low-friction choice, but its limited features and small review base suggest it’s less adaptable for complex or growing operations.

Shiji Daylight provides a feature-rich, scalable platform supported by a vast ecosystem of integrations. Its strong recent reviews and focus on automation and multi-property management make it the clear choice for larger or expanding hotel groups.

If your hotel values simplicity and dedicated support, AutoClerk could be sufficient; however, for those needing extensive features, integrations, and future growth potential, Shiji Daylight is the better investment.

In conclusion, given the more recent reviews, higher overall ratings, and broader feature set, Shiji Daylight emerges as the stronger choice for most hotel types, especially those planning to scale or require detailed operational control.