The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 15 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
AeroGuest destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como PMS Integration.
Hoteza destaca en ROI and onboarding , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Lobby Kiosk.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 15 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 13 | 2 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Check-in sin contacto para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) | #15 1 reseñas | #20 0 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #8 9 reseñas | #11 2 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | #17 1 reseñas | #22 0 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | #11 2 reseñas | #9 0 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 10 reseñas | #12 2 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #11 5 reseñas | #12 1 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | #19 1 reseñas | #16 0 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada | #16 0 reseñas | #17 0 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | #12 0 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #8 12 reseñas | #11 1 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico | — | #8 0 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente | #8 1 reseñas | #6 0 reseñas |
Choosing the right contactless check-in system for your hotel hinges on understanding each product’s strengths and limitations. AeroGuest Check-in by AeroGuest and Hoteza Check-In by Hoteza both aim to streamline arrivals, reduce queues, and enhance guest experiences, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, segment, and technological needs.
AeroGuest boasts broader adoption, more recent reviews, and a higher overall rating, making it a compelling choice if your priority is proven reliability and extensive integrations. Hoteza, despite fewer reviews, offers a highly rated, easy-to-use platform with strong support and customization options. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals?
Both AeroGuest and Hoteza focus on contactless check-in, reducing manual front-desk interactions and providing a smoother arrival experience. AeroGuest’s platform emphasizes automation with integrations to over 14 PMS systems, allowing full pre-arrival check-in and room selection, which is ideal for hotels seeking high levels of operational automation. Conversely, Hoteza’s solution is web-based and app-free, designed for quick, straightforward implementation, often favored by smaller or mid-sized hotels needing a simple, reliable solution.
While AeroGuest has a broader market footprint, including regions like North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, Hoteza maintains a strong presence mainly in North America, South America, and Europe. Both products aim to reduce queues and manual input, but AeroGuest’s more extensive integration ecosystem and broader geographic reach make it more adaptable for large or international hotels. Do you prioritize a globally proven solution or a straightforward, easy-to-deploy system?
If your hotel operates in a large market or requires integration with multiple PMS and third-party systems, AeroGuest is the better fit. Its 26 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SiteMinder, provide seamless integration, making it ideal if automation and data flow are critical to your operations. AeroGuest’s high review count (11 reviews in the last six months) and 5/5 overall rating reflect proven customer satisfaction.
If your hotel is smaller, values simplicity, or wants a solution with a quick setup and high ease of use, Hoteza should be your choice. With only 2 recent reviews but a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use rating and support, Hoteza appeals to hotels prioritizing straightforward implementation and dedicated support. Its cloud-based, app-free approach minimizes tech complexity, suitable for properties that prefer minimal integration efforts.
In summary, choose AeroGuest if you need advanced automation and extensive integrations; opt for Hoteza if you prefer simplicity and direct support. Your hotel’s size and technological infrastructure should guide this decision.
AeroGuest scores 4.77/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its seamless, mobile-first approach that lets guests check in, select rooms, and pay before arrival. Its onboarding process averages 4.6/5, and users highlight the platform’s intuitive nature, though some note room for improved chat features outside the backend.
Hoteza, rated slightly higher at 5/5, is praised for its straightforward, web-based interface, which requires no app download. Its onboarding is rated perfect, with users finding it quick to teach staff and guests. Given Hoteza’s focus on simplicity and quick setup, it’s favored for properties that want minimal training and hassle.
Edge: Hoteza.
Both platforms share 18 core features, such as digital check-in, payment processing, and multilingual support. AeroGuest offers additional capabilities like PMS integration, a feature only it possesses, allowing it to connect seamlessly with existing property systems.
Hoteza provides unique features like Lobby Kiosk and Automatic Translations, which are absent in AeroGuest. Its customizable, multilingual interface and digital signature options enhance international guest handling. Overall, AeroGuest’s extensive integrations and feature set make it more comprehensive for large properties, while Hoteza’s simplicity and specialized features suit smaller hotels.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s support team scores 4.77/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, reliable assistance and smooth onboarding. Customers describe AeroGuest support as "responsive and helpful," though some suggest more proactive communication on emerging trends.
Hoteza’s support is rated perfect at 5/5, with reviews praising its promptness and personalized attention. Hotel staff appreciate the straightforward, effective support that helps them implement the platform quickly, especially for international properties with multilingual needs.
Edge: Hoteza.
AeroGuest boasts 26 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, and integrations with channel managers and mobile access systems. Shared integrations include Stayntouch, Mews, and Vingcard, but AeroGuest’s broader partner list indicates greater flexibility for complex setups.
Hoteza offers 20 verified partners, including hotelkit, Shiji Group, and Amadeus, focusing more on hospitality-specific solutions but with fewer total integrations. If extensive third-party connectivity is vital, AeroGuest’s larger partner ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s 11 recent reviews and overall 5/5 rating underscore its strong customer satisfaction, especially among city center and boutique hotels. Reviewers appreciate its automation, ease of use, and integration capabilities, with one noting, “AeroGuest makes the check-in process effortless, reducing queues and administrative work.”
Hoteza’s limited reviews (2 recent) and perfect 5/5 ratings reflect a highly favorable perception among early adopters, mainly in North America and Europe. Its simplicity and dedicated support earn praise, though the smaller sample size suggests less widespread validation.
Given the larger review base and higher recent activity, AeroGuest holds the edge.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest charges a base fee of $400, with no mention of additional implementation, monthly, or per-room fees. Its straightforward pricing appeals to hotels seeking predictable costs without extra charges.
Hoteza’s base price is $600, also without additional charges, but often requires a longer-term commitment for full deployment. While slightly more expensive, Hoteza’s pricing reflects its comprehensive features and support.
If budget is a primary concern, AeroGuest’s lower price point offers more value for similar core functionality. However, consider whether additional features justify the extra cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
AeroGuest and Hoteza both aim to simplify contactless check-in, but AeroGuest’s extensive integrations, broader global presence, and larger review base give it a decisive advantage. Its focus on automation and scalability makes it suitable for larger, complex hotels.
Choose AeroGuest if your goal is high-level automation, proven performance, and extensive system connectivity. Its broad market reach and recent high ratings assure reliability and ongoing support.
Opt for Hoteza if your hotel is smaller, values ease of use, quick setup, and personalized support. Its app-free design and simplicity make it ideal for properties seeking to enhance guest experiences without heavy tech investments.
In conclusion, AeroGuest is the more proven, feature-rich platform for most large or international hotels. Hoteza is a strong contender for properties valuing simplicity, quick deployment, and personalized support.
Note: This comparison is based solely on available reviews, feature lists, and pricing data. Your specific needs and technical environment will ultimately determine the best fit.
Los precios de Check-in sin contacto rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, AeroGuest Check-in y Hoteza Check-In comparten 18 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations | ||
| Integración PMS | ||
| Quiosco del vestíbulo |
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. AeroGuest Check-in y Hoteza Check-In comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Contactless Check-in, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. AeroGuest Check-in ofrece 26 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Hoteza Check-In ofrece 20. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Hoteza Check-In lidera en facilidad de uso con 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
AeroGuest Check-in: No. Hoteza Check-In: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Contactless Check-in ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. AeroGuest tiene un HT Score de 0 y Hoteza tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Recomendaciones personalizadas adaptadas a su propiedad.