The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 20 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Big Fish Internet destaca .
Neobookings destaca en ease of use and customer support .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 20 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 20 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Diseño de sitios web para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #12 6 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #13 10 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | — | #9 4 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | — | #18 0 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 11 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #13 7 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | — | #16 3 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada | — | #10 3 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Europa ▾ | — | #14 5 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico | — | #17 0 reseñas |
Choosing the right website design platform for your hotel hinges on your priorities: ease of use, support, features, and overall value. Both Big Fish Internet and Neobookings aim to elevate your online presence, but they diverge significantly in their approach, user feedback, and market presence. Big Fish offers a comprehensive website management system, while Neobookings emphasizes beautiful, conversion-focused hotel websites paired with reservation tools.
Given that Neobookings has gathered more recent reviews and a larger number of favorable ratings, it currently provides a more reliable gauge of user satisfaction. This makes it the stronger choice for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly, well-supported website solution. But does the difference in focus and support justify a decision? Let’s examine each aspect closely.
Big Fish Internet presents itself as a broad website management platform designed to handle everything from hosting to content updates, with an emphasis on security and technical control. Its reviews are scarce, with no recent data or user feedback to substantiate its performance, reliability, or ease of use.
In contrast, Neobookings specializes in creating visually appealing, high-conversion hotel websites complemented by reservation management tools. It boasts 20 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.8, and a customer support rating of 5/5, indicating strong, recent user satisfaction.
While Big Fish touts its platform’s security and scalability, the lack of recent review data makes it tough to assess its current effectiveness. Neobookings’ recent positive feedback emphasizes its support, ease of use, and ongoing product improvements, making it a more dependable choice for hotels aiming to modernize their digital presence. Are you willing to base your decision on an untested, unreviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a website builder that prioritizes intuitive design, fast onboarding, and reliable support, go with Neobookings. It is especially suitable for properties that want an attractive, conversion-oriented site with integrated booking capabilities, supported by a team that actively improves their product.
If your team requires a comprehensive website management system focused on technical control, security, and extensive customization—possibly for larger or enterprise-level operations—Big Fish might initially seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews makes it difficult to confirm if it meets current industry standards.
For hoteliers seeking proven support, a user-friendly interface, and ongoing innovation, Neobookings clearly emerges as the better fit today. The platform's recent reviews and high recommendation rate solidify its standing as the more dependable solution.
Neobookings scores a near-perfect 4.85/5 for ease of use, backed by 20 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and excellent customer support. Users frequently describe the platform as “very professional,” “easy to navigate,” and “a pleasure to work with,” emphasizing the seamless experience and rapid setup.
Big Fish Internet, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its user experience. Its platform is designed for website management, but without recent feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Given the clear, recent positive feedback, Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings offers a suite of features tailored to hotels: a visually appealing website builder, integrated reservation engine, digital campaigns, and 20 verified partners including SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp. Its platform is designed to increase direct bookings and streamline operations.
Big Fish Internet claims to be a comprehensive website management platform but provides no specific features or integrations, and no verified partner data. Its feature set remains undefined, making it difficult to assess its capabilities or compare them meaningfully.
Edge: Neobookings, with its clear, targeted feature set and verified integrations.
Neobookings receives a perfect 5/5 support rating based on recent reviews praising its “super effective technical support” and “wonderful human team.” Customers highlight their satisfaction with ongoing communication, quick problem resolution, and proactive product updates.
Big Fish Internet has no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Its absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine if it offers the responsive service that hoteliers need.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings integrates with 20 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp, making it highly flexible for hotel operations and marketing. Its platform supports a variety of digital tools that directly enhance booking conversions and operational efficiency.
Big Fish Internet has no verified integrations or partner data, signaling limited or nonexistent connectivity with other hotel tech solutions. This restriction could hinder future growth or integration efforts.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings’ recent reviews reveal an exceptionally high likelihood to recommend score of 98%, with users describing it as “delightful to work with” and “an example of how all companies should operate.” Its target segment includes a diverse range of properties, from luxury hotels to boutique and city center hotels, with positive feedback across segments.
Big Fish Internet lacks any recent reviews, ratings, or customer feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment-specific performance. The absence of recent data favors Neobookings as the more trusted platform today.
Edge: Neobookings.
Big Fish Internet’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent pricing model—raising questions about value and accessibility.
Neobookings charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free trial, but offers a clear, predictable fee structure. Its focus on transparency and recent reviews of value for money (ROI of 4.74/5) suggest it’s a good investment for hotels seeking a balance of performance and affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel values ease of use, quick setup, or support—since these are unverified or absent for Big Fish.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a highly customizable backend or operates in regions where Neobookings has limited presence.
Big Fish Internet offers a broad, potentially scalable website management solution, but its lack of recent reviews or detailed features makes it hard to recommend confidently. Its focus on technical control might appeal to larger, tech-savvy teams but leaves smaller hoteliers in the dark regarding support and ease of use.
Neobookings, meanwhile, excels in recent customer satisfaction, ease of use, and support, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels today. It provides a well-rounded package—beautiful design, integrated booking, and strong support—that can help your hotel attract and convert more guests.
If your priority is rapid deployment, support, and proven user satisfaction, go with Neobookings. If you need deep customization and have technical resources, and are willing to accept the risk of limited recent feedback, Big Fish might meet your needs. For now, the data clearly favors Neobookings as the safer, more effective choice.
Los precios de Diseño de sitios web rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| Big Fish Internet |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
Estas son las funcionalidades que cada proveedor ha configurado, organizadas por grupo de funcionalidades — los mismos datos que se muestran en el panel del proveedor. Expande un grupo para comparar las funcionalidades en paralelo.
| Funcionalidad | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Diseño y Gestión de Contenidos
|
|
|
| Constructor de páginas de arrastrar y soltar | ||
| Plantillas para sitios web de hoteles | ||
| Capacidad de etiqueta blanca | ||
| Temas totalmente personalizables | ||
| Redactor de publicaciones de blog | ||
| Mapas de atracciones personalizables | ||
| Personalización del sitio web | ||
|
▾
Conversión
|
|
|
| Marcado de AMP de Google | ||
| Storefront/Voucher Functionality | ||
| Móvil optimizado / receptivo | ||
| Revisar widgets | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Ventanas emergentes y alertas | ||
| Mapas de atracciones personalizables | ||
| Personalización del sitio web | ||
|
▾
internacionalización
|
|
|
| Plurilingüe | ||
|
▾
Analítica
|
|
|
| Conexión de Google Analytics | ||
|
▾
SEO y tráfico
|
|
|
| Integraciones de redes sociales | ||
| Marcado de AMP de Google | ||
| Móvil optimizado / receptivo | ||
| Plurilingüe | ||
| Plugins de SEO | ||
| Mapas de atracciones personalizables | ||
|
▾
Seguridad y Cumplimiento
|
|
|
| Protocolos de seguridad (SSL / HTTPS) | ||
| Cumple con la ADA | ||
|
▾
Ventas adicionales
|
|
|
| Storefront/Voucher Functionality |
Analizamos 1 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Big Fish Internet y Neobookings Web Design comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Website Design, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Big Fish Internet ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Neobookings Web Design ofrece 20. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Neobookings Web Design lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Big Fish Internet: No. Neobookings Web Design: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Website Design ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Big Fish Internet tiene un HT Score de 0 y Neobookings tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Recomendaciones personalizadas adaptadas a su propiedad.