HS/3 (acq Mews) vs. RMS:
Qual è Quello Giusto per Te?

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both HS/3 (acquired Mews) and RMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge in scope, features, and market presence.

HS/3 offers a more modest, less reviewed platform with no recent customer feedback, while RMS has a well-established presence, with nearly 300 reviews, recent positive feedback, and a higher overall rating. Will your hotel benefit more from RMS’s extensive features and scalability, or is HS/3’s simpler approach enough?

Is HS/3 or RMS Better for Hotels?

HS/3 and RMS both serve to automate reservations, check-ins, and payments, but RMS’s broader feature set supports complex hotel operations and scaling. RMS’s 20 recent reviews in the last six months give it a significant edge in up-to-date customer sentiment, whereas HS/3’s lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess current performance.

While HS/3’s review score is 0/5, RMS’s 4.56/5 reflects strong user satisfaction. RMS’s high NPS score of 8.51/5 and 86% likelihood to recommend confirm its popularity among users, especially in the current market.

Are you seeking a proven, well-reviewed platform, or are you comfortable with an unreviewed solution that might lack ongoing support and updates?

RMS vs HS/3: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS with deep feature integration, RMS is the clear choice. Its extensive capabilities, including channel management, revenue tools, guest CRM, and online booking, cater to hotels aiming to grow and streamline complex operations.

Conversely, HS/3 might appeal if your hotel is small, requires basic functionalities, and prefers a simpler, less costly solution. If ease of use and minimal complexity are your priorities, HS/3 could suffice, but beware of limited current support and market presence.

For hotels planning to expand or needing integrated revenue management and multi-channel support, RMS’s comprehensive features make it the superior option. If your hotel’s focus remains on basic reservations and simple operations, HS/3 may be adequate, but its lack of recent reviews is a concern.

Is HS/3 or RMS Easier to Use?

RMS’s interface is highly rated for user-friendliness, with a 4.28/5 ease of use score and positive reviews praising its intuitive booking chart and straightforward operations. Support staff are praised for helpfulness and quick responses, with a 4.48/5 customer support rating.

HS/3’s lack of recent reviews prevents a current usability assessment, but its minimal feature set suggests a simpler, less cluttered interface, likely easier for small hotels with basic needs. However, without recent feedback, the ease of onboarding and daily use remains unclear.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Features: HS/3 or RMS?

RMS offers over 74 features, including integrated CRS, online support, payment processing, a booking engine, revenue management, group bookings, housekeeping, guest CRM, and multi-lingual/multi-currency support. Its extensive suite supports multi-property management, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and digital registration—features essential for larger or complex hotels.

HS/3, by contrast, offers no verified features, with no available detailed list or unique capabilities. Its limited feature set suggests it’s a basic PMS without advanced tools, leaving it at a disadvantage for hotels seeking comprehensive operational support.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: HS/3 or RMS?

RMS boasts a 4.48/5 support rating, with recent reviews highlighting helpful, prompt assistance and proactive support staff. Users appreciate the availability of support, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, which is crucial for complex systems.

HS/3’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews make it impossible to assess current customer service quality. Given RMS’s strong support reputation, it clearly leads in this area.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has More Integrations: HS/3 or RMS?

RMS supports 112 verified integrations, including major OTAs, payment processors, and third-party tools like Criton, Sage, STR, and Unifocus. Its broad ecosystem facilitates seamless operations across booking, POS, revenue, and marketing systems, crucial for hotels with diverse tech stacks.

HS/3’s integration count is zero, which limits its ability to connect with other tools. For hotels requiring extensive third-party connectivity, RMS’s integration ecosystem is a decisive advantage.

Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HS/3 or RMS?

With 293 recent reviews and a 4.56/5 rating, RMS enjoys strong, current user approval across various hotel segments, especially in the hospitality industry. Hotels of all sizes, from boutique to large resorts, rate RMS highly, especially for its feature set and support.

HS/3 lacks recent reviews and a public rating, making it difficult to gauge current user sentiment. RMS’s proven performance and recent feedback make it the more trusted choice among hoteliers today.

Edge: RMS.

How Much Do HS/3 and RMS Cost?

HS/3’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be a bespoke or less transparent solution. RMS charges a flat fee of $800, with no free tier or trial, offering a straightforward, predictable cost structure.

While RMS’s price might seem high for small hotels, its comprehensive features justify the investment, especially when compared to HS/3’s opaque pricing.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HS/3?

• Hotels that operate on a small scale with minimal complexity.
• Teams seeking a straightforward system with basic reservation and check-in capabilities.
• Properties with limited budgets looking for a low-cost solution.
• Hotels that do not plan to scale or add advanced revenue tools.

Not ideal if your hotel values multi-property management, integrations, or growth support, as HS/3’s capabilities appear limited.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

• Hotels aiming to scale operations across multiple properties.
• Hospitality businesses needing advanced revenue management, online booking, and channel management.
• Hotels that prioritize automation, real-time reporting, and guest engagement.
• Properties with complex needs, including group bookings, multi-currency, or multi-lingual support.

Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with basic needs, and prefers a simple, low-cost system without extensive features.

RMS vs HS/3: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RMS is a feature-rich, scalable platform trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Its extensive capabilities support growth, complex operations, and seamless integrations, making it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels or portfolios.

HS/3 remains a less verifiable, basic option that might serve small, budget-conscious properties needing minimal automation. However, the lack of current reviews and features puts it at a significant disadvantage for modern hoteliers seeking reliable, comprehensive systems.

If your hotel seeks a proven, well-supported PMS with advanced features, RMS is the clear choice. For very small hotels or those with minimal needs, HS/3 might suffice—though its market presence and support are unverified.

In summary, RMS’s recent reviews and high ratings make it the stronger, more reliable option for most hotels today.