The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Cambridge PMS by Shiji and HotelTime PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Cambridge PMS is a less-reviewed, less recent product with no available ratings, but its integration capabilities and niche presence contrast sharply with HotelTime’s extensive features, proven market presence, and high user ratings. Your decision will largely depend on whether you prioritize proven customer satisfaction or a broader feature set.
Cambridge PMS remains virtually unreviewed, leaving your team with limited user feedback and uncertain support quality. Conversely, HotelTime boasts over 430 reviews in the past six months, a 4.83 out of 5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making it the more reliable choice for most hotel operators.
Cambridge PMS aims to provide a comprehensive management platform, but its minimal review footprint and zero recent user feedback make it difficult to gauge real-world performance or support quality. HotelTime, by contrast, has a well-established presence across diverse hospitality segments, with recent, detailed reviews highlighting its ease of use, extensive features, and responsive support.
While Cambridge PMS claims to streamline operations, the lack of user-backed validation raises questions about its effectiveness. HotelTime’s recent reviews emphasize its ability to improve operational efficiency, especially through automation and integration, which are critical for modern hotels.
Are you willing to rely on a product with no recent customer data, or do you prefer a platform with demonstrated, current user satisfaction?
If your hotel needs an established, feature-rich PMS with extensive third-party integrations, go with HotelTime. Its 58 verified partners and over 430 recent reviews bolster confidence in its reliability and ongoing development.
If your hotel prioritizes a simple, less integrated management system, or if you’re exploring options without immediate support concerns, Cambridge PMS might seem appealing — but with no recent reviews, it’s difficult to verify its performance. For most hotels seeking proven results, HotelTime’s comprehensive platform and active customer base make it the clear choice.
For hotels that want a full suite of features—including guest CRM, booking engine, channel management, and automation—HotelTime is the safer bet. If your team favors a more basic, potentially less supported system, Cambridge may suffice, but with limited assurance.
HotelTime scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.66 out of 5 rating and numerous reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and efficient workflows. Users describe it as “simple, clear, and user-friendly,” facilitating staff training and daily operations.
Cambridge PMS, however, has no recent ratings or reviews, leaving its usability unverified and potentially less reliable. Its lack of user feedback prevents a confident assessment of onboarding or staff adoption.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automation, online check-in, and more—most of which are absent from Cambridge PMS. Its extensive feature set caters to mid- to large-sized hotels needing operational integration and automation.
Cambridge PMS appears to lack documented features, suggesting a more limited scope. For hotels seeking a versatile, feature-rich platform, HotelTime’s comprehensive offerings and proven flexibility provide a distinct advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support and onboarding ratings are both above 4.7/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful staff, and ongoing assistance. Review quotes such as “support staff were always on the other end of the phone and willing to help” underscore its emphasis on customer satisfaction.
Cambridge PMS has no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. The absence of feedback leaves potential support concerns unverified, making HotelTime’s support reputation the safer choice.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime features 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, with many integrations tailored for revenue management, POS, and distribution. Its broad integration ecosystem is a key advantage for hotels seeking an interconnected tech stack.
Cambridge PMS, with only one verified partner and no mention of additional integrations, offers a stark contrast. If seamless connectivity is essential, HotelTime’s extensive third-party support makes it the obvious pick.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s recent reviews consistently rate it highly across segments, with an overall rating of 4.83/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of all sizes, from boutique to resorts, praise its ease of use, automation, and support quality.
Cambridge PMS, lacking recent reviews and ratings, offers no reliable data on user satisfaction. Based on current feedback, HotelTime’s user ratings strongly favor it for satisfaction and trust.
Edge: HotelTime.
Cambridge PMS provides no publicly available pricing information, leaving potential users uncertain about costs and value. HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no implementation or additional fees, offering transparent pricing for budgeting.
Without clear data on Cambridge PMS’s pricing, HotelTime’s straightforward fee structure and known costs make it easier for your team to plan financially.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven reliability, extensive features, or integration support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very limited budgets and minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer open-source solutions with less vendor support.
The core difference lies in market presence, user feedback, and feature breadth. HotelTime is a mature, well-supported platform with a broad feature set, proven satisfaction, and extensive integration options.
Choose HotelTime if your hotel needs reliability, extensive automation, and active support backed by recent reviews. Cambridge PMS might appeal to smaller operations with minimal needs, but without recent validation, it’s a riskier choice.
For most hotels looking for a trusted, feature-rich PMS that supports growth and operational complexity, HotelTime is the smarter choice. If simplicity and cost are your only concerns, and support is less critical, Cambridge could suffice—but with caution.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Cambridge PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Cambridge PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Cambridge PMS oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Cambridge PMS: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos