The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Ciaobooking se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Ciaobooking mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s efficiency and guest experience. You are weighing Ciaobooking by Ciaobooking and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME—two platforms designed to streamline operations but differing significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which solution aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Remember, with more recent reviews and a larger user base, HotelTime PMS provides a more reliable snapshot of current performance. Which product truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Both Ciaobooking and HotelTime aim to automate hotel management, but they diverge sharply in execution and maturity. Ciaobooking, with zero reviews and no recent data, offers no detailed insights into its real-world performance or customer satisfaction levels. Meanwhile, HotelTime boasts 433 reviews, with 27 recent ones in the past six months, providing a clearer picture of ongoing support, usability, and feature reliability.
HotelTime’s high ratings—4.83 out of 5 overall and a 9.26/5 NPS score—indicate strong user satisfaction and consistent support. Conversely, Ciaobooking’s lack of reviews and scores suggests it’s either very new or not widely adopted, making it difficult to assess its suitability.
Are you comfortable choosing a product without recent user feedback, or do you prefer a solution with proven performance?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich platform capable of supporting complex operations and scaling across multiple properties, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its extensive capabilities—over 51 unique features like integrated CRS, guest CRM, payment processing, and housekeeper modules—are proven across thousands of properties worldwide. It caters well to mid-sized and large hotels seeking robust automation and integrations.
Ciaobooking, with no available features or user reviews, might suit very small or niche operations willing to accept a less proven solution. If your focus is on foundational reservation management without advanced features, Ciaobooking could suffice, but the risk remains high given the lack of data.
For most hotels seeking stability, proven support, and a broad feature set, HotelTime is the definitive recommendation.
HotelTime’s user experience scores—4.66/5 for ease of use and 4.73/5 for support—highlight its intuitive interface and positive onboarding feedback. Review quotes praise its simple, clear management reporting and seamless reservation handling, which allows staff to learn quickly and perform efficiently.
Ciaobooking, on the other hand, has no available usability data or reviews. The lack of user feedback makes it impossible to assess its interface, onboarding process, or staff adoption effectiveness.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 verified features, including integrated POS, guest profiles, automated night audit, revenue management, and online check-in—covering most operational needs. Its comprehensive suite supports multi-lingual, multi-currency transactions, automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems like channel managers, payment terminals, and CRM tools.
Ciaobooking has no listed features or integrations, indicating limited or undeclared functionality. This makes HotelTime the obvious leader for feature depth and versatility.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews consistently highlight its responsive, knowledgeable support team, with an average rating of 4.73/5. Comments mention helpful onboarding, continuous updates, and a proactive approach to customer needs, making it easier for hotels to maximize system potential.
Ciaobooking offers no review data or customer feedback, so support quality remains unknown. Without recent user experiences, HotelTime’s support reputation strongly favors it.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment providers, and third-party systems essential for streamlined operations. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but HotelTime’s extensive partner network supports comprehensive hotel tech stacks.
Ciaobooking has no verified integrations or partner data, suggesting limited connectivity or that integrations are not a focus. For hotels needing a connected ecosystem, HotelTime’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews—4.83/5 rating from 433 reviews—reflect a broad, recent positive sentiment across diverse property types. Hotels ranging from boutique city hotels to resorts and chains praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Ciaobooking lacks reviews altogether, meaning no peer feedback exists to gauge user satisfaction. Given the recent and plentiful HotelTime reviews, its higher rating is a clear indicator of reliability and user approval.
Edge: HotelTime.
Ciaobooking’s pricing details are unavailable, leaving questions about affordability and value. Conversely, HotelTime charges a base fee of $600, with no mention of additional implementation or recurring costs, indicating a straightforward pricing model.
While HotelTime’s cost may be higher upfront, its extensive features and proven support justify the investment for most hotels. Ciaobooking’s lack of transparency makes it a risky choice from a value perspective.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime stands out as a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations, strong support, and a large, recent review base. Its comprehensive tools support hotels in automating and streamlining operations across departments, making it suitable for properties of all sizes.
Ciaobooking, with no recent reviews or detailed features, appears to be an untested or emerging solution. If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and robust support, HotelTime is the safer, more reliable choice.
For hotels seeking a mature, well-supported PMS capable of supporting growth and complexity, HotelTime is the clear winner. Conversely, if your operation is minimal, budget-constrained, or experimental, Ciaobooking might be worth a cautious look—though the risks are significant.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Ciaobooking e HotelTime PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Ciaobooking e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Ciaobooking oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Ciaobooking: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Ciaobooking tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos