The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Persefone se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Automated Assignments.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 549 | 0 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do HOTELTIME mais valorizam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics, enquanto os usuarios do Persefone destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 219 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 238 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #2 46 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #8 7 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 241 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #4 143 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #4 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #52 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #5 111 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #1 21 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Persefone hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and scale. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but HotelTime’s extensive features, proven track record, and larger user base make it the more compelling choice for most hoteliers today. Persefone offers a simplified, web-based suite suited to smaller or less complex properties but lacks the same breadth of functionality or recent user feedback.
HotelTime excels in delivering a feature-rich platform with widespread adoption, while Persefone’s niche focus and limited recent reviews leave its real-world performance less certain. For a reliable, well-supported PMS with a proven reputation, HotelTime is the stronger contender. Are you ready to explore the details?
Both HotelTime and Persefone aim to manage hotel operations efficiently, but HotelTime’s reviews highlight its comprehensive capabilities and high satisfaction levels. Persefone, despite its long presence in Italy, has no recent reviews or extensive features listed, making it difficult to gauge its current effectiveness.
HotelTime’s recent 27 reviews across 433 users in the last six months reinforce its standing, whereas Persefone’s zero reviews in that period suggest limited recent user feedback. This difference underscores HotelTime’s stronger presence and confidence among hoteliers. Are you confident that a system with extensive, recent feedback better suits your hotel?
If your hotel requires a feature-rich, globally proven PMS capable of supporting large-scale or complex operations, go with HotelTime. Its extensive modules—including integrated CRS, guest CRM, payment processing, and automation—are ideal for properties that need deep management tools and reliable support.
If your hotel is smaller, with straightforward needs and limited budget, Persefone’s lower price point and simplified interface might seem appealing. However, without recent reviews or demonstrated advanced features, it’s less likely to support long-term growth or complex workflows. For most hotels seeking robustness and support, HotelTime is the clear choice.
HotelTime’s user interface is rated 4.66 out of 5, with many users praising its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Its onboarding process scores 4.63, with many users reporting quick setup and effective training, though some note the complexity of certain modules.
Persefone offers a web-based platform, but with no available user ratings or recent feedback, it’s impossible to compare ease of use confidently. Given HotelTime’s high ratings and proven track record, edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s 42 unique features include EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, online check-in, automated night audit, and more—far surpassing Persefone’s single listed unique feature, automated assignments. HotelTime’s breadth supports multi-department management, revenue optimization, and guest engagement, making it suitable for larger or more complex properties.
Persefone’s one feature, automated assignments, is a valuable addition but insufficient to compete with HotelTime’s extensive suite. The clear edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support ratings score 4.73 out of 5, with reviews consistently citing responsive, knowledgeable assistance and thorough onboarding. Customers appreciate their ability to handle issues promptly, which is critical for operational continuity.
Persefone provides no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving their support quality uncertain. In the absence of data, the edge goes to HotelTime, whose support reputation is well established.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partner integrations, including Profitroom, Bookboost, STR, and others, facilitating seamless connectivity with distribution, analytics, and payment systems. Persefone lists no verified partners or integrations, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel tech.
For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected system, HotelTime’s extensive integration options give it a definitive edge. End: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating is 4.83/5 based on 433 reviews, with recent reviews in the last six months emphasizing its stability, feature set, and support. Its user base covers a range of segments, from luxury hotels to resorts, with high satisfaction across property types.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user sentiment. Given the volume and recency of HotelTime’s reviews, the edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime charges a $600 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial info, which may be standard for comprehensive PMS solutions. Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200 monthly, but details on what’s included or whether there are setup fees are not provided.
While HotelTime’s higher price reflects its extensive features, the lack of transparency on Persefone’s costs makes comparison difficult. However, given HotelTime’s proven value and support, its higher cost is justified for most hotels needing a full-featured solution.
Not ideal if you own a very small property with minimal management needs or limited budget, as HotelTime’s extensive modules may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if you need advanced automation, extensive integrations, or support for complex operations at scale.
The core difference lies in scope. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a proven reputation and strong support, making it suitable for properties of all sizes, especially those seeking growth and integration. Persefone provides a simplified, competitively priced solution, likely best for small, straightforward hotels or boutique properties with basic needs.
If your hotel values extensive functionality, recent positive reviews, and reliable support, HotelTime is the clear choice. Conversely, if budget and simplicity are your priorities, Persefone might fit, but its lack of recent validation makes it a risky bet for long-term success. For most hotels seeking dependability and scalability, HotelTime is the recommended option.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, HotelTime PMS e Persefone compartilham 9 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| Atribuições automatizadas | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Taxas personalizadas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 31 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. HotelTime PMS e Persefone compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. HotelTime PMS oferece 58 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Persefone oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
HotelTime PMS: Nao. Persefone: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. HOTELTIME tem um HT Score de 92 e Persefone tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos