The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
PYLON se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 549 | 0 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do HOTELTIME mais valorizam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics, enquanto os usuarios do PYLON destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 219 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 238 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #2 46 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #8 7 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 241 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #4 143 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #4 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #52 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #5 111 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #1 21 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and PYLON Hybrid hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and strategic goals. Both products aim to improve hotel management, but HotelTime offers a full-featured PMS with extensive integrations and a proven track record—especially with recent reviews—while PYLON focuses on revenue management through analytics, yet lacks recent user feedback. Which solution aligns better with your operational priorities?
HotelTime PMS delivers a comprehensive, cloud-based system designed to streamline your property’s core functions, from reservations to housekeeping. PYLON emphasizes boosting profitability through advanced demand forecasting and dynamic pricing, but its absence of recent reviews makes its real-world performance harder to gauge. Are you seeking an all-in-one platform or a specialized revenue tool?
HotelTime PMS excels at offering a broad suite of features that cover nearly every aspect of hotel operations, making it suitable for properties of all sizes—including resorts, boutique hotels, and chains. It’s built to manage reservations, POS, spa services, guest profiles, and more, with a focus on operational efficiency.
Conversely, PYLON Hybrid specializes solely in revenue management, leveraging AI-driven analytics to optimize pricing and demand forecasts. It’s tailored for hotels that prioritize maximizing revenue and profit through data-driven pricing strategies rather than day-to-day operational management.
Both products aim to serve different hotel needs. HotelTime is suited for properties seeking an integrated operational system, while PYLON is ideal if your primary goal is revenue optimization. Does your hotel require a full management platform or a revenue-focused tool?
If your hotel needs a robust property management system that integrates reservations, billing, housekeeping, and guest communication, go with HotelTime PMS. Its extensive feature set, more than 650 properties worldwide, and recent customer reviews with a 4.83/5 rating make it a dependable choice for operational excellence.
If your team is focused on increasing profitability through demand forecasting and price optimization, PYLON is the better fit. Its AI-driven approach is designed for revenue managers and sales teams who rely on real-time analytics to make pricing decisions, though the lack of recent reviews warrants caution.
For hotels looking for an all-in-one platform with proven stability and support, HotelTime stands out. For revenue-centric operations that already have a PMS in place, PYLON may offer an edge. Which of these priorities align with your hotel’s growth strategy?
HotelTime’s user-friendly interface scores 4.66/5 for ease of use, with many users describing it as intuitive and simple to adopt. Its onboarding process is rated 4.63/5, and recent reviews highlight staff training and support as effective, although some mention initial complexity in module setup.
PYLON, lacking recent reviews, offers an interface praised for simplicity in its AI-driven analytics, typically favored by revenue teams rather than operational staff. Still, without user feedback, it’s difficult to confirm how quickly new users can adopt or how supportive the onboarding is.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts over 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, EPoS, guest CRM, automated night audit, online check-in, multi-currency support, and extensive modules for spa, housekeeping, and revenue management. It provides tools for everything from guest profiles to group management and payment processing.
PYLON, focused solely on revenue management, offers advanced analytics, demand forecasting, and dynamic pricing features, but it does not include operational modules like reservations or guest communication. Its core strength lies in data-driven revenue strategies rather than broad hotel management.
In terms of feature breadth, HotelTime clearly leads. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5 in reviews, with hoteliers praising their quick responsiveness, detailed onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Customers frequently comment on the system’s stability and the support staff's proactive approach.
PYLON, with no recent reviews available, offers no current data on support quality. The absence of recent user feedback makes it difficult to assess their customer service or responsiveness.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, STR, Bookboost, and channel managers like Lybra Tech and Hotellab. Its extensive partner network supports a wide variety of third-party systems, crucial for comprehensive hotel management.
PYLON, with only 6 verified integrations, has limited connectivity options, primarily related to ERP and financial systems. It does not currently support as many external systems or third-party integrations as HotelTime.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s latest reviews, from the past 6 months, reflect a high satisfaction rate—93% likelihood to recommend and an overall rating of 4.83/5. Hotels of varying sizes and segments, including resorts and city-center hotels, praise its ease of use, support, and comprehensive features.
For PYLON, no recent reviews or user ratings are available, making it impossible to determine current user sentiment. The lack of recent feedback suggests HotelTime currently holds the higher reputation among hotel operators.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Its flat monthly fee covers the full suite of features, making costs predictable but potentially high for smaller properties.
PYLON does not publicly disclose its pricing, which may vary based on the scope and scale of implementation. Without transparent pricing, evaluating value becomes difficult, but HotelTime’s straightforward fee structure offers clarity.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime PMS stands out as a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with recent positive reviews and extensive integrations, making it suitable for most hotels seeking operational control. Its high user ratings and proven support system make it a reliable choice for enhancing efficiency.
PYLON Hybrid offers a specialized solution for revenue optimization through analytics, but without recent reviews, its current performance and user satisfaction are uncertain. It likely benefits revenue teams at hotels that already operate a robust PMS and focus on pricing strategies.
If your priority is a full hotel management system backed by recent user feedback, HotelTime is the clear winner. If your focus is on maximizing revenue through data-driven insights and your existing systems are in place, PYLON could be an option—though caution is advised due to limited recent user data.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, HotelTime PMS e PYLON Hybrid compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. HotelTime PMS e PYLON Hybrid compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. HotelTime PMS oferece 58 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto PYLON Hybrid oferece 6. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
HotelTime PMS: Nao. PYLON Hybrid: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. HOTELTIME tem um HT Score de 92 e PYLON tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos