The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Softstar se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do Softstar destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Mews PMS stands out with its extensive reviews, recent updates, and broad industry adoption, while Softstar’s offerings remain less documented and review-deficient. Do you want a proven, highly-rated solution with a large user base or a less established platform? The clear answer is in the reviews and recent data.
Mews PMS functions as a cloud-based operating system tailored for modern hotels, offering over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with a rating of 4.62/5. Softstar’s review count is nonexistent, and it provides no recent user feedback, making it difficult to gauge real-world performance. Mews’s recent reviews showcase a high level of satisfaction, with a Likelihood to Recommend of 93%, whereas Softstar lacks such data altogether.
Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations, but Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience. Softstar’s focus, by contrast, appears more aligned with property management for rentals rather than full-service hotels. Is your goal operational automation and guest experience? If so, Mews’s robust review-backed performance clearly outpaces Softstar’s unverified claims.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, highly-rated PMS with proven scalability—especially if you operate multiple properties or require extensive integrations—go with Mews. It offers 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, and automated housekeeping modules, supported by over 336 verified partners.
Conversely, Softstar might be suitable if your focus is on rental or property management automation, especially if your operation is small or in a niche where detailed tenant and maintenance tracking is key. But without recent reviews or a clear feature set, it’s hard to justify choosing Softstar over the extensively vetted Mews.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by a substantial review count (758, with 98 in the last six months). Users praise its modern, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training, with many noting how quickly they adopted the system—“Mews is the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market,” says one reviewer.
Softstar’s user-friendliness is undocumented, with no recent reviews or ratings available. This absence suggests a lack of user feedback, which complicates assessing its ease of use.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, digital registration, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and a comprehensive booking engine. It also provides advanced modules like guest messaging, automated reminders, online check-in/out, and centralized user management.
Softstar’s feature list remains undisclosed and lacks comparable depth or detail. Given the extensive functionality and proven integrations, Mews clearly leads in feature richness.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is generally rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews emphasizing their responsiveness and effective issue resolution. Users say, “Their support team sets new standards,” and appreciate the onboarding experience, especially during implementation. Some reviews note occasional bugs but rapid resolutions.
Softstar offers no recent reviews, support ratings, or customer feedback, making it impossible to evaluate service quality. The absence of user testimonials or ratings favors Mews’s established support reputation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including prominent integrations like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and expansive Mews Marketplace enable seamless connectivity across a broad spectrum of third-party solutions, enhancing operational flexibility.
In contrast, Softstar has no verified integrations listed, limiting its adaptability. For a hotel seeking a flexible, interconnected tech ecosystem, Mews’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating is backed by 758 reviews, with recent feedback from diverse hotel segments—boutiques, hostels, city hotels—highlighting its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels like Cresta Palace and The Neighborhood Hotel praise its connectivity and operational efficiencies, reinforcing its broad appeal.
Softstar’s review absence indicates no recent or substantial user ratings, making it impossible to compare satisfaction levels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base price of $900/month, with no free tier or trial options noted. Pricing is straightforward but may be considered an investment for smaller hotels.
Softstar provides no pricing information, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs or whether it offers scalable or flexible pricing models.
In summary, Mews's transparent pricing and proven value make it a more predictable choice.
Not ideal if you need a rental-specific or tenant-focused property management system only.
Not ideal if you require a full-service hotel PMS with proven reviews, automation, and guest-facing features.
Mews stands out as a highly-rated, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews from a broad range of hotel segments. Its 99.5+ HT score, large review base, and recent user feedback confirm its reliability and scalability.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a proven platform with extensive integrations, automation, and user satisfaction, especially if you operate multiple properties or want a modern digital experience.
Softstar may suit niche rental or property management needs, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and proven track record makes it a less confident choice for hotels prioritizing guest service, operational automation, and growth.
For hotels seeking a dependable, high-rated solution, Mews is the clear winner—an investment that supports your hotel’s current needs and future growth.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Softstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Softstar compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Softstar compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 335 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Softstar oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Softstar: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 100 e Softstar tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos