The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
ZHARA se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do ZHARA destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational success and guest satisfaction. While both Mews PMS and ZHARA aim to streamline operations and boost profitability, they serve different needs—Mews is a full-scale hospitality platform, whereas ZHARA concentrates on revenue management and pricing strategies. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a comprehensive PMS solution or an advanced revenue optimization tool. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Mews PMS and ZHARA tackle distinct challenges. Mews offers an all-in-one cloud-based platform that handles reservations, guest communications, housekeeping, integrations, and reporting, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency. ZHARA, on the other hand, specializes in revenue management by providing AI-driven pricing insights to maximize profitability. Where do your hotel’s pain points lie—day-to-day operations or revenue maximization?
Mews’s recent review data shows a high overall rating of 4.62 out of 5 based on 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, underscoring its current popularity. Conversely, ZHARA’s lack of reviews and ratings suggests less recent user feedback, making Mews’s user base the stronger, more reliable choice today. Do you want a proven, actively supported system or a niche revenue tool?
If your hotel needs an integrated platform that manages reservations, front desk tasks, guest communications, housekeeping, and third-party integrations, go with Mews. It’s best for hotels that want to automate daily operations, improve guest experiences, and scale easily, especially in segments like boutique, city center, or hostel accommodations.
If your primary focus is optimizing revenue and pricing strategies through advanced analytics and AI-driven recommendations, ZHARA might be suitable—though its limited feedback indicates it is less suited for comprehensive hotel management. For hotels seeking operational control and guest service, Mews remains the superior choice.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s user interface garners a 4.7 out of 5 rating, with reviews praising its modern, intuitive design and straightforward setup. Its onboarding process averages 4.39 out of 5, with many users highlighting quick implementation and minimal training, supported by strong customer feedback like: “Mews is very user-friendly and makes everything much easier.” Support for staff adoption is well-rated, with many noting prompt assistance.
ZHARA, lacking publicly available ratings or recent reviews, offers no comparable data on ease of use. Based on the absence of feedback, it’s safe to assume Mews currently provides a more accessible, user-friendly experience. Edge: Mews
Mews boasts 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, integrated POS, mobile app, and extensive reporting tools. These functionalities enable comprehensive management of front desk, housekeeping, revenue, and guest engagement.
ZHARA’s feature set appears limited to revenue management and analytics, with no distinct features listed beyond AI-driven reviews and recommendations. It lacks the broad operational tools that make Mews a versatile PMS. For your hotel’s daily management needs, Mews clearly offers more actionable capabilities.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s support and onboarding ratings average 4.27 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users highlight prompt resolution of issues and a dedicated support team, often describing Mews as “supportive and proactive,” especially during implementation.
ZHARA provides no publicly available support ratings or recent feedback, making it impossible to assess service quality. Given Mews’s established reputation and recent review activity, it’s the safer choice for reliable support. Edge: Mews
Mews offers a verified network of 336 integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and many more—making it highly adaptable to various operational tools. Its extensive API and marketplace enable customization and seamless connectivity tailored to your hotel’s needs.
ZHARA’s integration count is zero, indicating it functions more as a standalone revenue tool without broad connectivity options. For a hotel that relies on multiple systems, Mews’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s reviews reflect a 4.64/5 rating from 679 hotel-specific evaluations, with notable praise from boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties. Hotels in segments like city center and boutique consistently rate it highly, with recent reviews emphasizing usability, automation, and support.
ZHARA has no available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the robust, recent feedback for Mews, it’s clear hoteliers prefer and trust it more.
Edge: Mews
Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no free trial, freemium tier, or clear pricing for additional features. Its pricing model suggests a premium, enterprise-level platform suitable for hotels with larger budgets seeking a full-service PMS.
ZHARA’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, and no trial information is available, indicating a lack of transparency. For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking clear cost expectations, Mews’s transparent pricing provides peace of mind.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews
Not ideal if:
Edge: ZHARA (for revenue-focused tasks)
Mews PMS and ZHARA serve different core functions, with Mews providing a comprehensive hotel management platform and ZHARA specializing in revenue optimization. For most hotels seeking operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and growth, Mews’s extensive feature set, recent reviews, and active support make it the clear leader.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS that automates daily operations and integrates with your existing tech stack. ZHARA may be suitable if your primary focus is maximizing revenue through AI-powered pricing insights and you already have operational systems in place.
If you prioritize a proven, user-friendly platform with broad capabilities, Mews is the definitive choice. For niche revenue management without operational management, consider ZHARA—but be aware of its limited feedback and integration options.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
ZHARA | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e ZHARA compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e ZHARA compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 336 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto ZHARA oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. ZHARA: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 99 e ZHARA tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos