BookingCenter vs. Noovy:
¿Cuál es el adecuado para ti?

The Decision

Choosing between BookingCenter and Noovy ultimately hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, infrastructure, and budget. BookingCenter offers a traditional, desktop-based PMS with central reservation capabilities but has little recent review activity. In contrast, Noovy provides a modern, all-in-one cloud system with a comprehensive feature set and recent, strong reviews. Given the current data, Noovy’s active user base and high ratings make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a full-featured management solution.

Quick Verdict

Noovy stands out as the more proven solution with 21 recent reviews and an overall 5/5 rating, compared to BookingCenter’s zero reviews and a 0/5 score. Its ease of use, extensive features, and high customer satisfaction ratings position it as the better option for modern hoteliers. BookingCenter’s lack of recent reviews and negative scoring suggest it may no longer be a competitive choice in today's hotel tech landscape.

Is BookingCenter or Noovy Better for Hotels?

BookingCenter aims to combine property management and global distribution in a single desktop-based platform, but it suffers from a significant lack of recent validation, with no reviews in the last six months. Noovy, however, has built a reputation through 21 recent reviews, all highly positive, reflecting ongoing support and innovation. While BookingCenter’s older, less reviewed platform might appeal to those preferring traditional desktop software, Noovy’s cloud-based approach offers more flexibility and features.

Both products aim to streamline hotel operations—BookingCenter with its integrated GDS and OTA management, and Noovy with its full suite of connected modules. The key difference is the active user feedback: Noovy’s reviews emphasize ease, speed, and support, signaling a product in tune with current industry needs. Is your hotel prepared to adopt a modern, cloud-based system, or do you prefer sticking with older, less supported software?

BookingCenter vs Noovy: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs an established desktop PMS with integration to global distribution, BookingCenter might seem attractive, but the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating suggest it’s not currently reliable. Noovy, with its comprehensive suite of 50 features, including channel management, revenue tools, and guest CRM, is suited for hotels seeking a modern, integrated platform. For hotels aiming to reduce complexity and costs—especially those in need of strong support—Noovy is the clear choice.

If you operate a boutique hotel or a multi-property group seeking a flexible, all-in-one solution, Noovy’s cloud-based approach offers better scalability. Conversely, if your team prefers traditional desktop software or has existing infrastructure built around older systems, BookingCenter may be considered, though the lack of recent validation is a concern.

Is BookingCenter or Noovy Easier to Use?

Noovy boasts a user rating of 4.62/5 and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and support. It’s designed by former hoteliers, emphasizing simplicity and connectivity, which helps your team adopt it quickly. BookingCenter, with a 0/5 rating, has no recent review data, making it difficult to assess its current usability. Its desktop-based nature suggests a steeper learning curve and potentially outdated interface.

Given the recent positive feedback, Edge: Noovy.

Which Has Better Features: BookingCenter or Noovy?

Noovy offers 50 features, including a channel manager, multi-currency support, PMS, booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, automated night audit, online check-in/out, and integrated payment tools—many of which are absent in BookingCenter. BookingCenter, on the other hand, has no unique or additional features beyond basic property management and GDS connectivity, with only the core functionalities implied.

For a hotel seeking a feature-rich, all-in-one system, the edge clearly goes to Noovy, which provides a broad set of modules designed to streamline operations and increase revenue.

Which Has Better Customer Support: BookingCenter or Noovy?

Noovy earns a 4.71/5 support rating, with reviews describing its support as "fast, friendly, and reliable," and praising its onboarding process. Customers highlight prompt assistance and comprehensive help, making the system easier to implement and maintain. BookingCenter, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, provides no recent insight into its support quality, raising concerns about ongoing service.

The current data favor Noovy for support, especially in the context of hotel operations requiring responsive and dependable assistance. Edge: Noovy.

Which Has More Integrations: BookingCenter or Noovy?

Noovy integrates with 40 verified partners, including major OTAs, CRS, and payment systems. Its extensive connectivity supports multi-channel distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement. BookingCenter only lists two verified partners—Aven Hospitality and Airbnb—limiting its integration capabilities and flexibility.

If your hotel relies heavily on third-party integrations for distribution and operations, Noovy’s broader ecosystem makes it the better choice. Edge: Noovy.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: BookingCenter or Noovy?

Since BookingCenter has no recent reviews, it cannot be rated by current users. Noovy’s 21 reviews in the last six months yield a perfect 5/5 rating, with hoteliers praising its ease of use, support, and comprehensive features. Segment-specific ratings show boutique hotels and city center properties particularly satisfied, with 20 reviews giving 5/5.

Given the recency and volume of positive reviews, Noovy’s user ratings significantly outperform BookingCenter’s nonexistent data. Edge: Noovy.

How Much Do BookingCenter and Noovy Cost?

BookingCenter does not publicly list its pricing, which suggests a bespoke quote or higher price point. Noovy’s transparent pricing is €£$5 per room per month, with no implementation or additional fees, making it accessible for small to medium-sized hotels.

If clear, predictable costs are key, Noovy’s straightforward model offers transparency, while BookingCenter’s pricing remains uncertain. Edge: Noovy.

What Type of Hotel Should Use BookingCenter?

• Hotels that prefer traditional desktop solutions and have existing infrastructure built around PMS and GDS.
• Larger properties or groups seeking a single platform for reservations and distribution.
• Hotels comfortable with possibly outdated interfaces and less frequent support updates.
• Hotels with minimal focus on automation or integrated guest communication.

Not ideal if your hotel values modern interfaces, frequent updates, and extensive integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Noovy?

• Hotels seeking an all-in-one, cloud-based system with integrated PMS, booking engine, revenue management, and guest CRM.
• Modern hoteliers aiming for automation, speed, and connectivity across channels.
• Hotels in need of strong support, frequent updates, and a scalable platform.
• Multi-property groups wanting centralized management and multi-currency/multi-lingual support.

Not ideal if your hotel has minimal digital operations or prefers standalone, traditional software.

Noovy vs BookingCenter: The Bottom Line for Hotels

BookingCenter presents a traditional PMS with GDS and OTA management, but it lacks recent validation and user feedback, making it a risky choice today. Its core strengths—property and distribution management—are overshadowed by the absence of ongoing support and updates, which are crucial in today’s hospitality landscape.

Noovy, with its high recent ratings, extensive feature set, and broad integrations, is clearly the superior option for hoteliers who want a modern, connected, and well-supported system. It caters to properties aiming to improve operational efficiency, guest experiences, and revenue.

If your hotel values a proven, feature-rich, and supported platform, Noovy is the way to go. Opt for BookingCenter only if you have an existing, stable setup and prefer legacy systems, but be aware of the risk posed by its current review silence.