The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 26 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Folio destaca en ease of use and customer support .
roommaster destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 26 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 3 | 23 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de procesamiento de pagos para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 6 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 7 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | #4 3 reseñas | #4 1 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | — | #4 0 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 reseñas |
| Lujo | #5 1 reseñas | #5 0 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | #5 2 reseñas | #4 1 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada | — | #4 0 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #5 3 reseñas | #4 14 reseñas |
| Europa | — | #5 0 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente | — | #3 0 reseñas |
Choosing between Folio Pay by Folio and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Folio Pay offers a modern, cloud-based solution focused on streamlining supplier payments and maximizing rebates, while roommaster Payments emphasizes seamless integration within your PMS to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and operational workflows. As a hotelier, your decision should reflect whether you prioritize financial control and cashback incentives or integrated operational efficiency.
Both products aim to improve payment workflows, but their core approaches diverge. Folio Pay’s strength lies in transforming accounts payable into a strategic financial tool with rebates, whereas roommaster Payments emphasizes reducing manual effort and chargebacks through tight integration. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Folio Pay and roommaster Payments are designed to address different hotel payment challenges. Folio Pay is ideal if your hotel needs a comprehensive platform to manage supplier payments, improve cash flow, and earn rebates—especially if you’re looking to modernize your accounts payable process. Conversely, roommaster Payments targets hotels seeking to streamline internal payment workflows within their existing property management system, with a focus on deposits, pre-authorizations, and reducing manual labor.
Folio Pay’s cloud-based nature offers greater flexibility, with an all-in-one payment hub that consolidates scheduling and execution of supplier payments, supported by features like ACH transfers and Mastercard® prepaid options. Roommaster Payments, on the other hand, emphasizes operational integration, automating deposits and pre-authorizations directly within your PMS, which can be crucial for daily hotel operations.
The reviews reveal that Folio Pay's recent updates and high customer satisfaction—rated 5/5 for ease of use and support—make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking financial control. Roommaster’s mixed reviews about system outages and support issues suggest that while it’s feature-rich, it may face stability challenges.
Are your hotel’s core needs financial management and rebates, or operational efficiency and system stability?
If your hotel prioritizes strategic financial management, cash rebates, and modern supplier payment workflows, Folio Pay is the clear choice. Its recent review count of 3, all within the last six months, coupled with a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend, indicates strong current confidence among users.
For hotels that require an integrated payments solution primarily to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and reduce manual processing within their PMS, roommaster Payments is suitable. However, it has a limited review base—20 reviews, with only 9 recent ones—and a slightly lower likelihood to recommend at 89%. Its more extensive feature set (13 features exclusive to it) makes it attractive for hotels with complex payment needs but also exposes it to potential stability issues noted in user feedback.
Your decision hinges on whether you need a modern, rebate-optimized platform (Folio Pay) or a tightly integrated operational tool (roommaster Payments).
Folio Pay earns a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, supported by recent reviews praising its straightforward interface and intuitive workflows. Users highlight that “it’s an excellent tool” and “easy to purchase,” with onboarding rated 5/5, indicating quick adoption and minimal training hurdles.
Roommaster Payments scores 4.4/5, with reviews citing its ease of use but noting glitches during busy periods and some frustrations with system outages. Support staff are praised for helpfulness, but the overall user experience is marred by instability and slower workflows.
Edge: Folio Pay.
Folio Pay’s core offering is its all-in-one payment hub, with no additional features listed beyond payment processing. In contrast, roommaster Payments boasts 13 exclusive features, including authorization adjustments, refund management, contactless payments, tokenization, and PCI compliance—crucial for hotels requiring diverse payment options.
While Folio Pay excels in cash rebates and supplier payment control, roommaster Payments offers advanced features for deposit handling, chargeback management, and in-system payment splitting. Given the feature count and recent positive reviews, roommaster Payments has a slight edge for hotels seeking operational depth.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Folio Pay’s reviews indicate a perfect 5/5 support rating, with comments like “support is great” and “they answer calls promptly.” The recent review count (3) suggests current positive experiences and high satisfaction.
roommaster Payments has a support rating of 4.45/5, with feedback pointing to helpful staff but also frustrations over outages and inconsistent issue resolution. The larger review base (20 reviews, with some highlighting system errors and slow support during outages) indicates lower overall confidence.
Edge: Folio Pay.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major hospitality technology providers such as Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia. This extensive network makes it suitable for hotels needing diverse third-party integrations within their PMS environment.
Folio Pay, with zero verified integrations, appears more standalone and less flexible if your hotel relies heavily on external systems. If seamless integration is a priority, roommaster Payments clearly leads.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Folio Pay, with only 3 recent reviews, has a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend from all reviewers, suggesting high satisfaction when it is used. However, the limited review count makes this less conclusive.
roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews and an 89% likelihood to recommend, shows generally positive feedback but some frustrations with outages, stability, and support. Given the recent reviews, Folio Pay’s higher recent confidence makes it the stronger rated product currently.
Edge: Folio Pay.
Folio Pay’s pricing details are not publicly available, indicating it may follow a custom quote model suited to larger enterprise clients or those with significant supplier payment needs. No free trial or flat rate info is provided.
roommaster Payments charges a flat fee of $300/month, with no mention of tiered pricing. This straightforward pricing makes it easy to budget for, though it may be costly for smaller hotels relying on fewer transactions.
Folio Pay’s lack of transparent pricing suggests it’s aimed at hotels with higher transaction volumes or complex financial needs, while roommaster Payments offers predictable costs for operational integration.
The core difference is that Folio Pay emphasizes financial rewards and strategic accounts payable management, while roommaster Payments focuses on operational transaction efficiency within the PMS. Folio Pay, with a recent surge of reviews and perfect support ratings, offers a more current and reliable solution for hotels looking to modernize their financial workflows.
Choose Folio Pay if your hotel seeks rebates, transparent control over supplier payments, and a cloud-based, easy-to-use platform. Opt for roommaster Payments if your hotel needs comprehensive in-system payment features, extensive integrations, and a solution embedded within daily operations.
In conclusion, for hotels that want a modern, well-reviewed, and highly supported payment platform, Folio Pay stands out as the preferable choice. However, if your hotel’s primary focus is operational depth, integration, and automation, roommaster Payments remains a solid, feature-rich option—though with some caveats about stability and support.
Los precios de Software de procesamiento de pagos rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Folio Pay y roommaster Payments comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acepta Visa | ||
| Ajustes de autorización | ||
| Captura parcial | ||
| Función de propina | ||
| Gestión de reembolsos | ||
| Pagar por enlace |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 1 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Folio Pay y roommaster Payments comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Payments Processing Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Folio Pay ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que roommaster Payments ofrece 56. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Folio Pay lidera en facilidad de uso con 5.0/5 vs 4.2/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Folio Pay: No. roommaster Payments: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Payments Processing Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Folio tiene un HT Score de 0 y roommaster tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos