The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 23 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
roommaster destaca en ease of use and customer support .
Shiji Group destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments and Recurring Payments.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 23 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 23 | 0 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de procesamiento de pagos para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #2 6 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 7 reseñas | #9 0 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | #4 1 reseñas | #5 0 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | #4 0 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 7 reseñas | #7 0 reseñas |
| Lujo | #5 0 reseñas | #6 0 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | #4 1 reseñas | #6 0 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada | #4 0 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #4 14 reseñas | #7 0 reseñas |
| Europa | #5 0 reseñas | #8 0 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente | #3 0 reseñas | — |
Choosing between roommaster Payments by roommaster and Shiji Astral Payments by Shiji Group hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both promise to streamline payment processes, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market reach. Your team needs a solution that not only fits your operational model but also offers reliable support and integrations. So, which payment platform is the better fit for your hotel?
Both products aim to improve transaction efficiency, reduce manual work, and handle complex payment scenarios. However, roommaster Payments is more focused on integrating directly within PMS systems, especially for North American markets, whereas Shiji Astral Payments emphasizes broad payment method support and global scalability. Do you prioritize regional reliability or international features?
roommaster Payments is designed primarily for hotels that want a straightforward, integrated payment solution within their existing PMS environment. Its strength lies in automating deposits, pre-authorizations, and reconciliation, especially for properties in North America and regions where it has established its presence. The reviews highlight solid ease of use and strong customer support, but recent user feedback criticizes stability issues and system errors, especially after recent cloud platform upgrades.
Conversely, Shiji Astral Payments offers a broader set of features, supporting multiple currencies, a wide range of payment methods (including Apple Pay, Google Pay, Alipay, WeChatPay), and comprehensive security protocols. It is a cloud-native platform, ideal for hotels seeking global reach and multiple payment channels. However, it lacks user reviews, making it harder to gauge real-world performance and support quality. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s operational goals?
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-implement solution with proven support in North America and a focus on simplifying payment workflows within a PMS, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 reviews, mostly recent, and high support ratings (4.45/5) demonstrate strong user satisfaction in stability and support.
If your hotel operates across multiple regions, handles numerous currencies, and requires a diverse array of payment methods, Shiji Astral Payments is the better choice. Its extensive feature set—supporting over a dozen payment types and integrations with POS systems—makes it suitable for larger, international properties. However, the lack of user reviews indicates a need for careful evaluation before deployment.
roommaster Payments boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.4/5, supported by reviews praising its straightforward interface and simple onboarding process. Users report that staff can adapt quickly, and the system integrates well with the PMS, streamlining daily operations. However, recent reviews mention stability issues and system outages that hinder usability.
Shiji Astral Payments, being cloud-based, typically offers a modern interface with intuitive features, but no user reviews are available to confirm this. Its extensive payment method support might introduce complexity, especially during initial setup, which could impact staff adoption. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 15 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, dynamic currency conversion, and acceptance of diverse payment methods like AliPay, WeChatPay, and Apple Pay. Its integrations with POS and PMS systems further extend its capabilities, making it suitable for hotels seeking extensive flexibility.
roommaster Payments offers 13 shared features, focusing on core payment functions such as deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management. It does not support as many payment methods or currencies but excels in automating reconciliation and reducing manual effort within PMS environments. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments benefits from a support rating of 4.45/5, with reviews frequently praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Users report that support technicians are knowledgeable and available, often resolving issues quickly. However, some recent feedback indicates system outages and stability concerns that complicate support interactions.
Shiji Astral Payments, lacking review data, makes it difficult to assess support quality. Given its global scale, it likely offers 24/7 support; yet, without user feedback, hotel teams should proceed cautiously, especially during initial implementation. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major vendors like Sage, GuestCentric, and Revinate. Its integrations focus on PMS, revenue management, and distribution channels, enabling a cohesive workflow for many North American hotels.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 64 verified partners, including popular systems like Oaky, Adyen, and SALTO. Its broader partner network reflects its aim to serve international markets with diverse needs. Both systems are well-connected, but Shiji’s wider partner ecosystem offers slightly more flexibility for varied hotel operations. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments has accumulated 20 reviews in the last six months, with a high overall rating of 4.45/5 and an NPS score of 8.4/10, indicating strong recent satisfaction. Hoteliers in North America rate it highly for support and ease of use, despite some concerns about stability.
Shiji Astral Payments has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its international footprint and feature set are promising, but without recent feedback, hoteliers should approach cautiously. Therefore, edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments is priced at a flat $300 monthly fee, with no free trial or tiered pricing structures publicly available. Its cost is straightforward, but some users feel it is high given recent stability issues.
Shiji Astral Payments charges a base price of $200 per month, with no trial info provided. Its pricing suggests a more flexible or scalable model, likely reflecting its extensive features. Without detailed rates, your team should request customized quotes based on your hotel’s transaction volume and regional needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs a wide array of payment methods, as the platform’s international features are limited.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely within North America with simple payment processing needs, as the platform’s extensive features may be unnecessary and more complex.
In essence, the core difference lies in the focus: roommaster Payments offers a reliable, North America-centric payment solution with high support ratings, while Shiji Astral Payments provides a versatile, globally oriented platform with extensive payment method options.
Choose roommaster Payments if your hotel values proven support, ease of use, and seamless PMS integration within North America, especially if stability is your priority. Opt for Shiji Astral Payments if your hotel operates internationally, needs multiple currencies, and wants a broad array of payment options—despite the lack of recent user reviews.
If your hotel prioritizes regional stability and support, roommaster Payments should be your go-to. However, if your operation demands flexibility, currency support, and global scalability, Shiji Astral Payments might be the better long-term investment.
In conclusion:
Your decision should reflect your operational landscape, regional needs, and support expectations.
Los precios de Software de procesamiento de pagos rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, roommaster Payments y Shiji Astral Payments comparten 13 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acepta AliPay | ||
| Acepta American Express | ||
| Acepta Mastercard | ||
| Acepta Paypal | ||
| Conversión dinámica de moneda (DCC) | ||
| Liquidaciones multidivisa |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 3 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 3 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Having a single PMS across our properties has allowed us to standardize operations while maintaining flexibility for individual hotel needs. This has significantly simplified train..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. roommaster Payments y Shiji Astral Payments comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Payments Processing Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. roommaster Payments ofrece 56 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Shiji Astral Payments ofrece 64. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. roommaster Payments lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
roommaster Payments: No. Shiji Astral Payments: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Payments Processing Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. roommaster tiene un HT Score de 0 y Shiji Group tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos