The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Travel Tripper destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Reseñas verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Mews valoran más su ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, mientras que los usuarios de Travel Tripper destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 329 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 397 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 45 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #3 49 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reseñas | — |
| Lujo ▾ | #5 220 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #2 170 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #1 130 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #8 106 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #10 17 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #28 8 reseñas | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Travel Tripper hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth goals. Mews is a full-suite property management system that automates and streamlines daily hotel operations, while Travel Tripper primarily focuses on booking, distribution, and revenue management aimed at maximizing direct reservations.
If your aim is to overhaul core hotel operations and improve guest experiences with a versatile, all-in-one platform, Mews is the clear frontrunner. But if your priority is enhancing your distribution channels and boosting direct bookings through sophisticated rate and availability management, Travel Tripper might seem attractive—yet, the lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it less reliable.
Mews and Travel Tripper serve different primary functions within hotel tech stacks. Mews offers a comprehensive cloud-based property management system with over 750 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.62/5, and recent reviews from the last six months—indicating ongoing support and development. Conversely, Travel Tripper has no recent reviews or ratings, suggesting little current market presence or user engagement.
Both products aim to optimize hotel performance, but Mews covers from booking to check-out, including guest management, housekeeping, billing, and integrations. Travel Tripper, meanwhile, concentrates on distribution and revenue management, helping hotels direct traffic and control rates but lacks core PMS functionalities.
Would you prefer a unified platform that manages your hotel end-to-end, or a specialized tool that maximizes your booking channels? Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings strongly suggest it’s the more trustworthy choice for comprehensive hotel management.
If your hotel needs a central system that automates guest check-ins, improves operational efficiency, and offers a broad suite of features—like multi-lingual support, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, and extensive integrations—then Mews is the clear pick. Its user-friendly interface, high customer satisfaction, and robust automation make it suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains seeking operational agility.
On the other hand, if your hotel’s primary goal is to optimize distribution, rate management, and reduce reliance on OTAs to increase direct bookings, Travel Tripper’s platform could be appealing. It specializes in channel management, advanced revenue management, and offers tools for rate and availability control, though it lacks the comprehensive PMS features found in Mews.
For most hotels seeking a full operational platform with proven reviews and ongoing support, Mews’s broad feature set and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more reliable choice.
Mews’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.7/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, streamlined onboarding, and mobile app capabilities. Many users highlight how staff can quickly adapt, often in just days, thanks to clear workflows and proactive support.
Travel Tripper, lacking recent reviews and detailed user feedback, does not offer comparable insights into usability. Its minimal online presence suggests it may not prioritize user experience or ongoing customer support, which are critical factors for hotel teams.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers over 59 features exclusive to its platform—including multi-currency support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, integrated payment processing, and mobile housekeeping. It also supports digital registration, guest messaging, online check-in/out, and centralized role management.
Travel Tripper’s core focus appears to be on booking and distribution, with no detailed feature list or comparable functionalities available publicly. Its specialization in rate control, channel management, and revenue optimization is valuable but does not replace the comprehensive operational tools in Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews has a strong support reputation, rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews emphasizing responsive, proactive assistance and effective onboarding. Customers note that support can resolve issues quickly, and the company frequently updates its platform based on user feedback.
Travel Tripper’s support ratings and recent user feedback are unavailable, making it difficult to assess their responsiveness. Given the lack of recent reviews, confidence in ongoing support and product evolution favors Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews connects to over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, point-of-sale systems, payment providers, and other hotel tech solutions. Its open API and extensive marketplace facilitate tailored integrations to meet diverse operational needs.
Travel Tripper currently has no verified partners, limiting its ability to integrate with other systems. This significantly reduces flexibility for hotels looking to build a connected, automated tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s review count of 758, with 98 recent reviews, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—independent, boutique, city center, hostels—rate it highly, with an average rating of 4.64/5 among reviews, mainly praising its usability and automation.
Travel Tripper has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The absence of feedback over time raises questions about its continued relevance or support.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s pricing starts at a base fee of $900 per month, with no freemium or free trial options. This flat rate covers core PMS functionalities, with additional costs potentially arising from integrations or add-ons.
Travel Tripper’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there is no information on trial or subscription models. The lack of transparency makes it difficult to compare value directly, but the available data favors Mews’s clear pricing structure.
Mews is a comprehensive cloud-based PMS that covers your entire hotel operation, from reservations to housekeeping, with a proven track record and recent positive reviews. Its extensive integrations and user-friendly design make it suitable for a broad range of hotel types, especially those seeking operational efficiency and a future-proof tech stack.
Travel Tripper specializes in distribution and revenue management, focusing on boosting direct bookings and controlling rates across channels. However, the lack of recent reviews and a limited feature set make it less reliable for hotels needing an all-encompassing management platform.
For most hotels, especially those wanting a trusted, well-reviewed solution with ongoing support and extensive features, Mews is the clear choice. If your core goal is to optimize your distribution channels and you’re comfortable with niche tools, Travel Tripper may be worth exploring, but the current data favors Mews.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
Travel Tripper | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Mews PMS y Travel Tripper comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Mews PMS y Travel Tripper comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Mews PMS ofrece 335 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Travel Tripper ofrece 0. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Mews PMS: No. Travel Tripper: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Mews tiene un HT Score de 100 y Travel Tripper tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos