The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Zavia ERP destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $900/mo | From $300/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Mews valoran más su ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, mientras que los usuarios de Zavia ERP destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 329 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 397 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 45 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #3 49 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reseñas | — |
| Lujo ▾ | #5 220 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #2 170 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #1 130 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #8 106 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #10 17 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #28 8 reseñas | — |
You're evaluating two property management systems: Mews PMS by Mews and Zavia ERP by Zavia ERP. Both aim to streamline hotel operations but approach the problem differently. Mews, with its extensive global presence and a large user base, offers a broad feature set and a proven track record. Zavia ERP, by contrast, is tailored for smaller and mid-sized hotels in Latin America, emphasizing affordability and localized support. Which system fits your hotel’s specific needs better?
Mews’s strengths lie in its depth of features, broad integrations, and user satisfaction, supported by over 750 recent reviews. Zavia ERP’s niche focus and competitive pricing appeal more to smaller hotels in Latin America. Can Zavia meet your operational complexity, or does Mews’s scale and robustness provide the security you need?
Mews and Zavia ERP both serve hotel operations but differ markedly in their approach and market focus. Mews addresses a diverse range of hotel types — from boutique to large chains — with a cloud-native platform that emphasizes automation, integrations, and guest experience. Zavia ERP primarily targets smaller hotels and boutique properties in Latin America, offering a simplified, localized solution.
While Mews supports multi-property management, extensive third-party integrations, and automation, Zavia focuses on core reservation management, real-time rate sync with over 40 agencies, and website creation without programming. Do you need a flexible, globally proven system, or a straightforward tool built for your regional market?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with integrations to support complex operations, go with Mews. Its vast ecosystem of over 1,000 integrations, high user ratings (4.62/5 from 758 reviews), and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.
If your hotel is smaller, operates mainly within Latin America, and prioritizes cost-effective control over operations, Zavia ERP is appropriate. At a significantly lower base price ($300 vs $900), it offers reservation management, real-time OTA rate sync, and native website creation, ideal for hotels under 200 rooms seeking simplicity.
Mews’s interface consistently earns a 4.7/5 user rating, praised for its modern, intuitive design and ease of onboarding, even for staff unfamiliar with PMS technology. Its cloud platform allows remote management, and many reviews highlight its straightforward setup and minimal training needs.
Zavia ERP’s user experience is less documented, but its localized design and support indicate a focus on usability for smaller hotels in Latin America. However, lacking extensive review data, it’s presumed less feature-heavy and might require more hands-on training for regional staff.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 51 core features, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, guest CRM, integrated CRS, automated reminders, and SOC2 compliance — all absent in Zavia. Its unique features enable complex revenue management, automation, and guest personalization, making it suitable for a variety of hotel types.
Zavia provides essential reservation management, OTA rate synchronization, and website creation, but lacks advanced features like guest CRM or automation tools. If your hotel demands sophisticated operations, Mews’s broader feature set is the clear leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support is rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive problem-solving. Hoteliers mention that support teams are helpful, though some note occasional bugs, which are swiftly addressed.
Zavia ERP, with no available review data, likely offers localized support tailored to Latin American markets, but the lack of widespread feedback means you cannot confidently assess response quality or resolution speed.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified partners, including top channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, supporting extensive customization. Shared integrations with platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Profitroom make Mews highly adaptable.
Zavia ERP has only 5 verified partners, mainly focusing on booking engines and payment gateways, limiting integration options. For hotels needing a flexible, connected tech environment, Mews’s ecosystem is unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews indicates strong, recent positive feedback, especially from boutique, independent, and city-center hotels. Hotels of various sizes in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific rate it highly, with many praising its ease of use and automation.
Zavia ERP has no available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction confidently. Given the volume and recency of Mews reviews, it’s the more trusted option by hoteliers.
Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base price of $900 per month with no trial or implementation fees, positioning it as a premium solution. Zavia ERP’s base price is $300 per month, with no mention of additional costs, appealing to hotels with limited budgets.
Your choice depends on your operational needs versus your budget. If you need extensive features and integrations, the higher cost of Mews is justified; for smaller hotels, Zavia offers a cheaper entry point.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Mews’s larger ecosystem, proven track record, and high user ratings make it the superior choice for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable property management platform. Its extensive features support complex operations, automation, and guest experience improvements, making it suitable for most mid-sized and larger properties.
Zavia ERP, with its lower price point and regional focus, is ideal for small hotels in Latin America aiming for basic reservation management and OTA integration without the need for advanced features. It’s best suited for properties with less operational complexity.
Choose Mews if your hotel plans to expand, needs extensive integrations, or values proven global support. Opt for Zavia if you want an affordable, straightforward system embedded in your regional market landscape.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $300/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Mews PMS y Zavia ERP comparten 51 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Mews PMS y Zavia ERP comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Mews PMS ofrece 335 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Zavia ERP ofrece 5. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Mews PMS: No. Zavia ERP: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Mews tiene un HT Score de 100 y Zavia ERP tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos