The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 17 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
A-Trust se distingue .
SHR Group se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Fully automated revenue management and Mobile Friendly Design.
Notes comparees basees sur 17 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 17 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion des revenus pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | — | #33 3 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #29 8 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #20 3 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #14 3 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #32 8 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #30 7 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #22 7 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #29 2 avis |
Par region
| Segment | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #17 7 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #26 7 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #10 3 avis |
Choosing between A-Trust by A-Trust and SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) means selecting between two platforms that aim to optimize your hotel’s revenue, but they approach this goal very differently. A-Trust is virtually unreviewed and appears to lack recent activity, raising concerns about its relevance or effectiveness. SHR RMS, on the other hand, boasts 15 recent reviews, a 9.8/10 NPS score, and a strong reputation for support and ease of use. Given this, SHR RMS is clearly the more proven choice.
Both products seek to streamline revenue management, but SHR’s extensive feature set and active customer base suggest a more mature, reliable system. Will you prioritize a platform with a proven track record and comprehensive features? Or are you considering a newer or less-revealed solution?
A-Trust offers no recent reviews, ratings, or detailed feature information, making it difficult to assess its current value or performance for your hotel. SHR RMS, with 15 reviews in the past six months, provides detailed insights into its capabilities, user satisfaction, and support quality.
If your hotel needs a proven, highly-rated revenue management platform with extensive support, SHR RMS is the clear choice. Conversely, if you’re exploring options with limited market presence and no recent data, A-Trust might be on your radar, but critical data gaps make it a risky pick.
If your hotel requires a mature, feature-rich revenue management system that includes automation, AI-driven forecasting, and a strategy builder, SHR RMS is the better fit. Its 40 unique features, including dynamic pricing, group evaluation, and scenario analysis, demonstrate its comprehensive approach.
If you’re a small hotel or boutique property seeking a simple solution without the need for advanced features, A-Trust’s limited available information makes it less compelling. SHR RMS’s proven performance and feature depth clearly serve hotels looking to scale and optimize revenue strategies.
Based on available data, SHR RMS scores an impressive 4.87/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process—supporting a smooth staff adoption journey. A-Trust provides no ratings or reviews, leaving its usability uncertain.
Given the high score and positive feedback, SHR RMS likely offers a more user-friendly experience. Edge: SHR RMS.
SHR RMS offers 40 distinct features, including automated room-type pricing, scenario analysis, and AI optimization—capabilities that A-Trust does not publicly list. These features empower your team to make data-driven decisions more efficiently and effectively.
A-Trust provides no publicly available features, making it impossible to compare directly. The feature count and detailed offerings from SHR RMS give it a significant edge.
SHR RMS boasts a 4.93/5 customer support rating, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful staff, and proactive service. One reviewer noted, “The support team is really quick to respond, and the analytics are easy to access,” reflecting high satisfaction levels.
A-Trust offers no recent support ratings or reviews, leaving its support quality unknown. Edge: SHR RMS.
SHR RMS integrates with 81 verified partners, including prominent systems like Criton, Priority Software, and OpenHotel. This broad integration capability allows your hotel to connect seamlessly with essential property management, channel management, and other operational tools.
A-Trust provides no publicly listed integrations, limiting its connectivity options. SHR RMS’s extensive partner network clearly gives it the advantage here.
With 15 recent reviews and a 9.8/10 NPS score, SHR RMS enjoys overwhelmingly positive feedback, especially among larger, more complex hotels seeking automation and strategic tools. The reviews reflect a high likelihood to recommend, with hoteliers praising its analytics and ease of use.
A-Trust has zero reviews, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the recent reviews and high scores, SHR RMS is the clearly preferred choice for user satisfaction.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details, which suggests they might tailor costs based on hotel size or specific needs. However, SHR RMS’s free trial and transparent model imply more straightforward access to value comparison.
Since A-Trust offers no trial information or pricing transparency, assessing value is challenging. SHR RMS’s clear approach to pricing supports better-informed decision-making.
Given the limited data, A-Trust seems suited for very small or uncomplicated properties with minimal revenue management needs.
SHR RMS’s broad feature set and proven support make it ideal for hotels that want to maximize revenue through data and automation.
At its core, SHR RMS offers a fully developed revenue management platform with extensive features, proven support, and a large, satisfied user base. A-Trust remains largely unreviewed and untested in recent times, creating uncertainty around its effectiveness and usability.
Choose SHR RMS if your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich system with recent reviews, strong support, and proven performance. It’s especially suitable for mid-size to large hotels or groups aiming to automate and fine-tune their revenue strategies.
If your property is small, niche, or you seek a very simple solution with minimal integrations and features, A-Trust might be worth exploring—but the lack of recent data makes it a less confident choice.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for proven results and modern capabilities, SHR RMS stands out as the safer, more capable investment.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion des revenus est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| A-Trust |
|
|---|
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, A-Trust et SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | A-Trust |
|
|---|---|---|
| Flux de travail guidés | ||
| Gestion des revenus entièrement automatisée | ||
| Modélisation de la sensibilité au prix | ||
| Tableau de bord analytique | ||
| Tarification dynamique | ||
| Tarification et évaluation de groupe |
Affichage des principales differences. 28 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. A-Trust et SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Revenue Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. A-Trust propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) en propose 81. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.9/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
A-Trust : Non. SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Revenue Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. A-Trust a un HT Score de 0 et SHR Group a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété