The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 517 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
amexus se distingue .
Actabl se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Daily Reporting and Financial Reporting.
Notes comparees basees sur 517 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 517 |
Apres analyse de 517 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de amexus apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Actabl mettent en avant customizability and flexibility, dashboards and visualization, data integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| amexus |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Dashboards and Visualization
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
System Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Training and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Errors and Data Accuracy
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Veille stratégique pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | amexus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 29 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 261 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 127 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #1 69 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | amexus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 197 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #2 131 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #1 386 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 76 avis |
Par region
| Segment | amexus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #1 487 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #13 9 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #8 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #6 5 avis |
Choosing a business intelligence platform for your hotel involves assessing data integration, ease of use, feature set, support quality, and overall impact on operations. Both amexus Informationstechnik GmbH and ProfitSword aim to serve your hotel’s decision-making needs, but their offerings diverge significantly. Amexus’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest limited market traction and confidence, whereas ProfitSword’s 449 reviews with recent activity and a near-perfect score indicate a more proven, trusted solution. So, which platform is truly better suited to your hotel?
Both amexus and ProfitSword address hotel data management and reporting, but their approaches and market presence differ sharply. Amexus’s offering appears minimal, with no recent reviews, features, or integrations, which raises questions about its ongoing support and innovation. In contrast, ProfitSword has a rich history, over 20 years of experience, and a broad user base across multiple regions, emphasizing its reliability and extensive capabilities. Do you prioritize proven performance and community validation?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable BI tool with extensive integrations, real-time analytics, and a large user community, ProfitSword is the clear choice. Its 449 reviews and a 9.36/10 NPS score reflect high customer satisfaction, especially among larger hotel groups and brands. Conversely, if your hotel operates on a limited budget, requires only basic reporting, or prefers a less complex solution, amexus’s minimal presence might seem appealing, though its lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence. For most hotels seeking trusted, feature-rich BI, ProfitSword is the safer bet.
ProfitSword’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.65/5, with many users citing its intuitive dashboards and straightforward onboarding process. The platform’s support team is praised for responsiveness, and customers report quicker adaptation time, especially for users familiar with BI tools. Amexus’s rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Edge: ProfitSword.
ProfitSword offers 35 features, including daily reporting, PMS mapping, budgeting, forecasting, advanced dashboarding, API integration, and multi-property management—many of which are absent in amexus. Its extensive feature set caters to complex hotel operations and strategic decision-making. Amexus provides no documented features or capabilities, which suggests it may lack the depth needed for comprehensive hotel BI. Edge: ProfitSword.
ProfitSword garners a 4.55/5 support rating, with reviews highlighting responsive, ongoing assistance and proactive collaboration. Customers note that support helps resolve issues swiftly, even during complex implementations. Amexus’s ratings are nonexistent, and with no recent reviews, its support quality remains unverified. Given the importance of reliable support in BI implementation, ProfitSword’s established reputation makes it the clearly better choice. Edge: ProfitSword.
ProfitSword integrates with over 100 verified partners, including PMS, CRM, and financial systems, supporting over 250 applications for seamless data flow. This extensive ecosystem helps automate reporting and reduce manual data handling. Amexus provides no verified integrations or partner information, limiting its flexibility and scalability. For hotels relying on multiple operational tools, ProfitSword’s integration network is a critical advantage. Edge: ProfitSword.
ProfitSword’s recent reviews show a 4.73/5 rating from 386 hotel reviews, with properties across various segments praising its utility for revenue management, budgeting, and operational insights. The high review count and recent feedback lend credibility and confidence. Amexus’s zero reviews or ratings mean no comparable data exists; therefore, hotelier preference clearly favors ProfitSword based on proven satisfaction. Edge: ProfitSword.
ProfitSword charges a base price of $1,000 per month, with no free tier or trial options available. The cost reflects its extensive features and integrations, making it a substantial investment for hotels seeking comprehensive BI. Amexus does not provide pricing details or trial information, which complicates comparison. Without concrete pricing for amexus, ProfitSword’s transparent fee structure makes it easier for your team to evaluate ROI.
The core difference is market presence and feature depth: ProfitSword is a long-established, well-reviewed platform with a proven track record, whereas amexus’s offerings are unverified and lack recent user feedback. If your hotel values a scalable, integration-rich BI solution supported by a large community, ProfitSword is the clear winner.
If your hotel operates on a very limited scope, only needs basic reporting, or is constrained by budget, amexus might seem appealing. However, the absence of reviews and features makes it a risky choice for most hotels seeking reliable, actionable data.
Ultimately, for hotels looking to improve operational insight and strategic decision-making, ProfitSword offers the clarity, support, and proven results that are essential in today’s competitive landscape.
La tarification des Veille stratégique est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| amexus |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, amexus Informationstechnik GmbH et ProfitSword by Actabl partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | amexus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Budgétisation | ||
| Cartographie PMS | ||
| Comptes à payer | ||
| Prévision | ||
| Rapport financier | ||
| Rapports quotidiens |
Affichage des principales differences. 23 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 1 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Labor is such a fast-moving category, so looking at performance after a month doesn't work. We monitor labor costs every day, for every property. I get a report, and our team works..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
The system allows flexible reporting and data display, which users find essential for tailoring insights to specific departmental needs. However, more... The system allows flexible reporting and data display, which users find essential for tailoring insights to specific departmental needs. However, more efficient navigation and expanded customization options could enhance usability.
ProfitSword offers highly customizable and intuitive dashboards, which users find beneficial for visualizing complex datasets and facilitating data-dr... ProfitSword offers highly customizable and intuitive dashboards, which users find beneficial for visualizing complex datasets and facilitating data-driven decision-making. However, some desire enhancements in user interface modernity and mobile usability.
ProfitSword effectively consolidates data from multiple sources such as PMS and CRM, providing a holistic view of hotel operations. This integration s... ProfitSword effectively consolidates data from multiple sources such as PMS and CRM, providing a holistic view of hotel operations. This integration supports strategic decision-making by reducing manual data entry and improving data accessibility.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users have expressed the need for improved system performance, particularly regarding server speed and reliability, as slow load times can hinder acce... Users have expressed the need for improved system performance, particularly regarding server speed and reliability, as slow load times can hinder access to time-sensitive data. Faster load times and better uptime would enhance user experience.
While ProfitSword is generally easy to onboard due to its intuitive interface, some users have called for more comprehensive training materials and re... While ProfitSword is generally easy to onboard due to its intuitive interface, some users have called for more comprehensive training materials and responsive support services to ease the learning curve of advanced features.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. amexus Informationstechnik GmbH et ProfitSword by Actabl partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Business Intelligence de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. amexus Informationstechnik GmbH propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que ProfitSword by Actabl en propose 100. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. ProfitSword by Actabl est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
amexus Informationstechnik GmbH : Non. ProfitSword by Actabl : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Business Intelligence proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. amexus a un HT Score de 0 et Actabl a 96. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits