The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 85 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Blastness se distingue en ease of use and customer support .
DIRS21 by TourOnline AG se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 85 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 85 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 85 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Blastness apprecient surtout gestion des canaux, soutien et assistance, revenue management, tandis que ceux de DIRS21 by TourOnline AG mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Gestion des canaux
▾
|
|
|
+
Soutien et assistance
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration de systèmes
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Gestionnaires de canaux pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #11 32 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #7 48 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #33 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 25 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #9 36 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #11 18 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge | #17 3 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #16 2 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 83 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #21 0 avis | — |
Choosing between Blastness Channel Manager and DIRS21 Channel Manager hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both products aim to streamline your distribution channels, but they differ significantly in user feedback, features, and regional presence. Blastness, with its 81 recent reviews and high satisfaction scores, offers a more trusted solution for hoteliers seeking a reliable, well-supported channel management platform. DIRS21, despite its larger partner network, lacks recent reviews and overall hotel industry ratings, making it a less certain choice.
Blastness stands out as the more mature, user-rated product, reflected in its 81 reviews and a recent NPS score of 9.74/10, whereas DIRS21 has no recent reviews or ratings. While both systems synchronize prices and availability, Blastness emphasizes its ease of use, customer support, and regional presence across multiple continents, including North America and Asia Pacific. DIRS21’s strengths lie in its large partner network of 31 integrations, mainly within Europe, but the absence of recent hotel reviews makes it harder to gauge current user satisfaction.
For your hotel, Blastness is favored if you prioritize high user satisfaction, recent feedback, and a proven track record. Conversely, if you are heavily reliant on specific integrations within Europe or want a larger network of partners, DIRS21 could be appealing, yet it lacks recent validation from actual hotel users. Do you want a platform with a strong recent reputation or one with a broader, older network?
If your hotel needs a channel manager that’s easy to implement, supported by a highly-rated customer support team, and used by a diverse range of hotel types—especially in North America or Asia—Blastness is your clear choice. Its 4.84/5 ease-of-use rating and 4.88/5 support score, along with 81 recent reviews, demonstrate a reliable, user-centric experience.
On the other hand, if your hotel primarily operates within Europe and you value an extensive partner network—31 verified integrations, including Profitroom and The Hotels Network—DIRS21 might appeal. However, without recent reviews or ratings, it’s difficult to assess its current performance or satisfaction levels. For most hoteliers seeking recent, trustworthy feedback, Blastness provides a more confident fit.
Blastness scores an impressive 4.84/5 in ease of use, based on recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward management. Users mention that its onboarding process is smooth, and the platform’s design simplifies daily tasks, aiding staff adoption. In contrast, DIRS21 has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given Blastness's high rating and recent positive feedback, it clearly leads on ease of use.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 15 core features, including real-time synchronization, revenue management, booking engine integration, and comprehensive analytics—all tailored to optimize online distribution. Its platform is praised for combining these features into a single, easy-to-use interface, with regular updates and improvements.
DIRS21 boasts 15 shared features but lacks unique or specialized functionalities that set it apart. It primarily focuses on real-time synchronization and centralized booking management, without additional features like revenue management or advanced analytics. Therefore, Blastness offers a broader feature set that aligns with the needs of modern hoteliers.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s support ratings are notably high, with a 4.88/5 score and positive reviews highlighting quick replies, professional assistance, and ongoing support. Users appreciate the dedicated team that actively provides insights and helps optimize platform use.
DIRS21 provides no recent reviews or ratings, leaving support quality unverified. Without current customer feedback, it’s impossible to determine whether DIRS21’s support matches the responsive, high-quality service that Blastness consistently delivers.
Edge: Blastness.
DIRS21 boasts 31 verified partners, nearly double Blastness’s 15. Shared integrations include major players like Oracle Hospitality and Mews. Its larger network may appeal if your hotel relies on specific platforms only compatible with DIRS21.
Blastness’s integrations are fewer but well-chosen, covering key channels and systems relevant to many hotels. Given its recent reviews and active support, Blastness’s integrations are proven to work smoothly, even if fewer in number.
Edge: DIRS21.
Blastness’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.84/5 ease of use, 4.88/5 support) suggest it is the preferred choice among hoteliers. With 81 reviews in the last six months and a 98% likelihood to recommend, it demonstrates strong user satisfaction across different property types, especially in North America and global markets.
DIRS21 has no recent reviews or ratings from hoteliers, making it difficult to determine user satisfaction. Its lack of recent feedback indicates less confidence in its current performance compared to Blastness.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness does not publicly disclose its pricing, but it offers a subscription-based model without implementation fees or freemium options, indicating a possibly tailored quote based on your property size and needs.
DIRS21’s price starts at $300 per month, with a 30-day trial period, but no detailed tier or feature-specific costs are available publicly. For most hoteliers, the lack of transparent pricing for Blastness might require direct inquiry, while DIRS21’s straightforward fee could appeal if budget certainty is essential.
Not ideal if you prefer a platform with a larger partner network solely within Europe or require specific integrations not yet supported by Blastness.
Not ideal if recent user feedback or support quality is critical, or if you require a platform with a proven, current hotel-centric reputation.
Core Difference:
Blastness is a highly-rated, feature-rich channel manager with recent reviews, excellent support, and broad regional presence. DIRS21 offers more integrations, primarily within Europe, but lacks recent hotel user feedback, making its actual performance uncertain.
When to choose Blastness:
When to choose DIRS21:
Final Verdict:
For most hoteliers, especially those seeking confidence from recent reviews and high satisfaction scores, Blastness is the superior choice. It offers a proven, well-supported platform that aligns with current industry needs. DIRS21 may suit properties with specific European needs but bears the risk of limited current user validation.
La tarification des Gestionnaires de canaux est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Nous avons analyse 3 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Le gestionnaire de canaux Blastness est reconnu pour sa synchronisation en temps réel, sa disponibilité et sa tarification constantes, réduisant ainsi... Le gestionnaire de canaux Blastness est reconnu pour sa synchronisation en temps réel, sa disponibilité et sa tarification constantes, réduisant ainsi les risques de surréservation. Les utilisateurs le trouvent intuitif et indispensable pour une gestion simplifiée de la distribution sur plusieurs canaux.
Bien que Blastness soit félicitée pour son excellent et rapide service client, certains utilisateurs suggèrent d'étendre les heures d'assistance, y co... Bien que Blastness soit félicitée pour son excellent et rapide service client, certains utilisateurs suggèrent d'étendre les heures d'assistance, y compris les week-ends, afin de mieux traiter les problèmes urgents.
Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven... Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven approach allows for dynamic pricing, enhancing overall profitability.
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Blastness Channel Manager et DIRS21 Channel Manager partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Channel Managers de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Blastness Channel Manager propose 15 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que DIRS21 Channel Manager en propose 31. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Blastness Channel Manager est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Blastness Channel Manager : Non. DIRS21 Channel Manager : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Channel Managers proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Blastness a un HT Score de 78 et DIRS21 by TourOnline AG a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits