The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 105 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
MyComp se distingue .
Sirvoy se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Notes comparees basees sur 105 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 105 |
Apres analyse de 105 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de MyComp apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Sirvoy mettent en avant customer support, ease of use, gestion des réservations. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| MyComp |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Gestion des réservations
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface utilisateur et conception
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Limitations fonctionnelles
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et adaptabilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Coût et rapport qualité-prix
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #22 36 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #48 3 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #46 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #27 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #37 7 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #42 4 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #35 3 avis |
Par region
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #23 16 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #13 6 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #27 0 avis |
When evaluating hotel property management solutions, your goal is to find a platform that enhances operational efficiency, improves guest experiences, and offers reliable support. Booking Engine CRS by MyComp and Sirvoy serve different segments of the hospitality industry, but only one has recent, highly-rated reviews and a strong global presence. MyComp’s lack of reviews and updates makes it difficult to assess; Sirvoy, with 95 reviews and a 9.41 NPS score, clearly demonstrates proven customer satisfaction.
Both products aim to streamline reservation management, but their feature sets and support structures differ substantially. Is your priority ease of use and extensive support, or are you seeking a more comprehensive feature suite? The choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions—so which software better aligns with your needs?
Booking Engine CRS by MyComp is positioned as a central reservation system designed to optimize bookings and revenue through automation and real-time analytics. However, it has no reviews or ratings, which raises questions about its current usability, support quality, and feature reliability. Sirvoy, in contrast, has accumulated 95 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of onboarding, intuitive interface, and excellent customer support.
While MyComp’s solution promises automation and integration with existing property management systems, the absence of recent reviews makes its performance uncertain. Sirvoy’s recent reviews highlight that support is "superb," and "software is super easy to use," with an overall customer support rating of 4.85/5. Given the lack of user feedback for MyComp, Sirvoy emerges as the more reliable choice and the stronger candidate for hotels needing proven, ongoing support.
Both systems manage reservations, but Sirvoy’s recent review count of 95 and positive comments on its booking management features give it a clear edge here. Users praise its automated updates across channels, with many citing how it simplifies online booking flows and reduces manual work. Conversely, Booking Engine CRS has no recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or customer satisfaction.
Sirvoy’s booking engine integrates with major channels like Booking.com and Expedia, offering real-time updates and synchronization, which modern hoteliers need. MyComp’s lack of review data means you cannot confidently assess its reservation capabilities, support, or ongoing development. For reservation management, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it the safer, more effective choice.
Sirvoy’s ease of use is reflected in a 4.64/5 UI rating and an NPS score of 9.41/10, backed by 95 reviews and recent positive feedback. Users consistently mention how intuitive and straightforward the platform is, with onboarding rated at 4.6/5. Support is a standout, with reviews describing staff as "quick, kind, thorough," and "the best support I have ever encountered."
MyComp has no ratings or reviews, leaving its usability and support quality entirely unverified. Its lack of recent user feedback is a significant concern, especially when compared to Sirvoy’s well-documented support excellence. For your team, ease of adoption and ongoing support are critical, and Sirvoy excels in these areas.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy offers 43 distinct features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, online check-in, guest CRM, automated reminders, and integrated payment processing. These features directly address daily operational needs and guest management, giving hoteliers more tools for customization and efficiency. Meanwhile, Booking Engine CRS provides no detailed feature list or unique functionalities, making it impossible to evaluate its capabilities against Sirvoy.
Given Sirvoy’s extensive feature set, which is regularly updated and backed by positive reviews, it’s clear that it offers more comprehensive tools for small to medium-sized properties. MyComp’s absence of detailed features suggests it’s less mature or less transparent about its offerings.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy’s customer support is rated 4.85/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and quick problem resolution. Many describe support staff as "superb" and "responsive," making onboarding and ongoing issues manageable. In contrast, MyComp has no reviews or ratings, so its support quality remains unverified.
In a service-dependent industry like hospitality, support quality can be the decisive factor. Sirvoy’s high support rating and recent positive comments clearly favor it, especially for properties that rely on prompt assistance for smooth operations.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy connects with 21 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Revinate, as well as booking engines and payment providers. Its integrations support seamless management across multiple channels and systems. MyComp offers no verified integrations, which raises questions about its ability to connect with other tools and expand as your property grows.
Having established integrations is vital for scalability and operational flexibility. Sirvoy’s broad partner network gives it a clear advantage, ensuring your hotel can adapt and expand without technical barriers.
Edge: Sirvoy
Sirvoy has a review count of 95 with recent reviews emphasizing ease of use, support, and value, leading to a high NPS score of 9.41. Property types such as B&Bs, vacation rentals, and boutique hotels rate it highly, indicating broad appeal. MyComp, without reviews or recent feedback, cannot be rated by hoteliers, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction.
Given the transparency and volume of recent reviews, Sirvoy’s high rating confirms its standing among users. Its consistent praise for customer support and usability makes it the more trusted choice.
Edge: Sirvoy
Booking Engine CRS does not list any pricing details, which suggests it could be custom quote-based or lacking transparency. Conversely, Sirvoy charges a flat rate of $200/month, with no mention of additional per-room fees, and offers a 30-day trial, providing clear value expectations.
Transparency in pricing is vital for your budgeting process. Sirvoy’s straightforward pricing model and trial offer make it easier to evaluate its ROI against uncertain or undisclosed costs of Booking Engine CRS.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, relies on simple booking needs, or prefers a well-established support network.
Not ideal if your hotel demands highly advanced CRM, extensive financial reporting, or complex enterprise integrations.
Booking Engine CRS appears to be a central reservation solution promising automation and analytics, but its lack of recent user reviews makes it an unreliable choice for now. Without current feedback, you risk investing in a platform that may not meet your operational needs or provide ongoing support.
Sirvoy, with 95 recent reviews and a 9.41 NPS score, demonstrates a proven track record of user satisfaction, ease of use, and comprehensive features. It’s well-suited to small and medium properties seeking reliable, straightforward management tools and excellent support.
If your hotel values verified user experiences and a platform with proven performance, Sirvoy is the clear choice. However, if you need a highly customizable, enterprise-level reservation system with specific integrations, you should carefully evaluate Booking Engine CRS once more detailed user feedback becomes available.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| MyComp |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Booking Engine CRS et Sirvoy partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Facturation directe | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Affichage des principales differences. 31 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, com... Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, comme la possibilité de regrouper des chambres en suites ou de proposer des forfaits, sont jugées perfectibles.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien... Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien et le besoin de fonctionnalités financières et de facturation améliorées. Des retours font également état du manque d'options CRM avancées et de difficultés d'intégration des fonctionnalités de vente incitative.
Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établis... Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établissement. Toutefois, certains utilisateurs aimeraient une plus grande flexibilité dans la personnalisation des factures et des options de facturation dynamiques.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Booking Engine CRS et Sirvoy partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Booking Engine CRS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sirvoy en propose 21. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Sirvoy est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Booking Engine CRS : Non. Sirvoy : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. MyComp a un HT Score de 0 et Sirvoy a 85. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits