The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 92 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Actabl se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Financial Reporting and Multicurrency Reporting.
Quickbooks (by Intuit) se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 92 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 92 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 92 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Actabl apprecient surtout system usability, budgeting and forecasting, customization and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Quickbooks (by Intuit) mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
System Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Budgeting and Forecasting
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Reporting
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
User Feedback on Potential Improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Problèmes techniques
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de comptabilité hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | #7 0 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #4 48 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 5 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #1 33 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 32 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 12 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #5 56 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge | #6 1 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #3 83 avis | — |
| Europe | #2 0 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #1 0 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #1 0 avis | — |
Choosing between Actabl’s Digital Night Audit and QuickBooks boils down to your hotel’s specific financial management needs. While both aim to streamline accounting processes, they serve vastly different functions: Actabl specializes in automating night audits for hotels, whereas QuickBooks offers a broader, general accounting platform. Your decision hinges on whether you want a specialized hotel solution or a versatile accounting tool.
Actabl’s high review count and recent feedback from hotel professionals lend it a significant edge over QuickBooks, which has no recent hotel-specific reviews and a limited partner ecosystem. Are you prioritizing hotel-specific automation, or do you need a flexible accounting platform for broader financial tasks?
Actabl, with a 90.6 HTR Score and 89 recent reviews, is clearly the stronger choice for your hotel’s night audit needs. Its dedicated focus on automating nightly financial workflows makes it invaluable for front-line hotel operations, reducing late-night stress and ensuring accuracy.
QuickBooks, despite being a leading accounting software globally, lacks recent hotel-specific reviews and a hotel-focused feature set. It’s better suited for small to medium-sized businesses outside the hotel industry or for hotels that need comprehensive financial management beyond nightly audits. If your hotel’s core requirement is automated night auditing, Actabl is the clear pick.
Actabl scores 4.72/5 for ease of use, backed by positive reviews praising its speed and simplicity. Users find it straightforward to adopt, with minimal learning curve, and appreciate its intuitive workflow, especially when replacing manual processes.
QuickBooks, however, has no recent reviews or ratings from hotel users, making it impossible to assess its hotel-specific usability. Given its general reputation for ease among small businesses, it’s likely user-friendly for non-hotel contexts but may lack hotel-specific workflows.
Edge: Actabl.
Actabl offers 17 features exclusive to hotel financial management, including import/export, multicurrency accounting, forecasting, budgeting, daily reporting, and PMS mapping—tools tailored for hotel operations. These features directly support the nightly audit, revenue analysis, and expense tracking.
QuickBooks lacks hotel-specific features and offers no unique functionalities in this context. Its core strengths lie in general ledger, invoicing, and expense management, but it doesn’t cater specifically to hotel night audits or multi-property reporting.
Edge: Actabl.
Actabl’s support scores 4.45/5, with reviews emphasizing its helpful onboarding process and responsive support team. Users report that support staff are knowledgeable about hotel needs and assist effectively during implementation and troubleshooting.
QuickBooks, with no recent hotel-specific reviews, provides support aimed at small business users. While generally considered reliable for broad accounting questions, it’s not tailored to hotel-specific issues, and evidence suggests less focus on hospitality support.
Edge: Actabl.
Actabl boasts 100 verified partners, including PMS systems like Stayntouch and other hotel-centric tools such as STR, Innspire, and Birchstreet. Its integrations support seamless data flow across hotel operations, improving accuracy and reducing manual inputs.
QuickBooks, with only 4 verified partners and limited hotel integrations, is less suited for hotel-specific workflows. Its integrations focus on general business systems, lacking the depth needed for hotel financial automation.
Edge: Actabl.
Actabl’s recent reviews reflect a high rating of 4.72/5, with an overall NPS of 9.27/5 and a 93% Likelihood to Recommend. Hoteliers praise its speed, ease of use, and automation for night audits.
QuickBooks, lacking recent hotel-specific reviews, cannot be reliably rated by hoteliers. Its global reputation is strong, but it doesn’t have demonstrated hotel-specific satisfaction.
Edge: Actabl.
Actabl charges a flat monthly fee of $400, with no trial, freemium, or tiered pricing mentioned. It’s a straightforward investment for dedicated hotel night audit automation.
QuickBooks’ pricing varies based on specific plans and features, but no current pricing information is available for hotel use. For small business accounting, it typically ranges from $25 to $180 per month, but these plans aren’t tailored for hotel night audits.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Hotels that prioritize nightly financial accuracy and automation should choose Actabl.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Hotels seeking a flexible, general accounting solution should opt for QuickBooks.
Actabl’s Digital Night Audit is a specialized, hotel-focused solution designed to automate, standardize, and validate nightly financial data. Its high user ratings, recent reviews, and extensive integrations make it ideal for hotels seeking a dedicated night audit tool that improves accuracy and saves time.
QuickBooks, while a leader in general business accounting, lacks recent hotel-specific feedback and features. It’s better suited for hotels that need broad financial management without the need for nightly automation or hospitality-specific workflows.
If your hotel’s priority is nightly audit automation and seamless hotel data integration, choose Actabl. If you need a flexible, all-purpose accounting platform for broader financial tasks, QuickBooks may suffice—but be aware it’s not tailored to hotel operations.
La tarification des Logiciel de comptabilité hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Actabl Digital Night Audit et Quickbooks (by Intuit) partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Budgétisation | ||
| Comptabilité multidevises | ||
| Importer / Exporter | ||
| Prévision | ||
| Rapport financier | ||
| Rapports multidevises |
Affichage des principales differences. 5 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
The system is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to learn, but some users point out that it could benefit from usability improvements, par... The system is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to learn, but some users point out that it could benefit from usability improvements, particularly in terms of search functions and data entry processes. Enhanced ease of use would increase efficiency and reduce time spent on tasks.
ProfitSword excels in budgeting and forecasting, providing precise tools for setting budgets and predicting financial outlook. Users appreciate its su... ProfitSword excels in budgeting and forecasting, providing precise tools for setting budgets and predicting financial outlook. Users appreciate its support for revenue trend analysis and planning. Some reviews mention a desire for more intuitive interfaces and enhanced forecasting features.
ProfitSword’s customization options are appreciated for accommodating varying departmental needs and supporting tailored financial plans. However, rev... ProfitSword’s customization options are appreciated for accommodating varying departmental needs and supporting tailored financial plans. However, reviews suggest improvements in enhancing the system's flexibility and ease of report customization.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Common feedback includes desires for more intuitive user interfaces, enhanced data syncing, and custom report-building features. Users also expressed... Common feedback includes desires for more intuitive user interfaces, enhanced data syncing, and custom report-building features. Users also expressed interest in more proactive and quicker updates to address minor but persistent system issues.
Certains utilisateurs signalent des problèmes techniques ponctuels, notamment lors de l'importation ou de l'exportation de données, ce qui perturbe le... Certains utilisateurs signalent des problèmes techniques ponctuels, notamment lors de l'importation ou de l'exportation de données, ce qui perturbe leur flux de travail. La résolution de ces problèmes améliorerait l'expérience utilisateur globale et la fiabilité du système.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Actabl Digital Night Audit et Quickbooks (by Intuit) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Accounting Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Actabl Digital Night Audit propose 100 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Quickbooks (by Intuit) en propose 4. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Actabl Digital Night Audit est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Actabl Digital Night Audit : Non. Quickbooks (by Intuit) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Accounting Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Actabl a un HT Score de 91 et Quickbooks (by Intuit) a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits