The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,136 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
DJUBO se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Yanolja Cloud Solution se distingue en matiere de user interface and ease of use — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (3.0/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Centralized user & role management.
Notes comparees basees sur 1,136 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 22 | 1,114 |
Apres analyse de 1,136 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de DJUBO apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Yanolja Cloud Solution mettent en avant user interface and ease of use, ota distribution and connectivity, inventory and rate management. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
OTA Distribution and Connectivity
▾
|
|
|
+
Inventory and Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Synchronization
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Axes d'amélioration : rapports, applications mobiles, personnalisation
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Gestionnaires de canaux pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #20 7 avis | #2 660 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #34 0 avis | #3 233 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #7 14 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #22 0 avis | #6 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #27 3 avis | #3 335 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #25 4 avis | #2 557 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #37 0 avis | #3 161 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #31 0 avis | #5 46 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #34 0 avis | #3 108 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 16 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #11 7 avis | #2 824 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #21 1 avis | #5 18 avis |
Choosing between DJUBO and Yanolja Cloud Solution comes down to your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline your distribution and management tasks, but they differ significantly in scope, user base, and recent activity. DJUBO is an all-in-one platform that integrates PMS, POS, revenue management, and more, mainly serving small to mid-sized hotels across Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East. Yanolja, on the other hand, is a robust channel manager with a broad global reach, particularly strong in North America, Europe, and beyond, focusing heavily on distribution connectivity.
While DJUBO's recent reviews are limited to 18, its high overall ratings and recent positive feedback reflect a reliable, well-regarded solution. Yanolja, with over 910 reviews and a near-perfect recent rating, enjoys a vast and active user community, which lends more current confidence. Do you prioritize a comprehensive management suite or a specialized distribution platform?
DJUBO and Yanolja serve different segments and operational styles. DJUBO consolidates multiple functionalities—PMS, booking engine, POS, revenue management—into a single platform, making it ideal for properties that want an integrated system to manage reservations, billing, and guest feedback from one interface. Yanolja excels at connecting your property to a vast array of OTAs, GDS, and metasearch platforms, making it suitable for hotels that rely heavily on distribution and want to maximize online reach.
DJUBO’s feature set, with 24 unique modules, supports multi-property management and detailed analytics, appealing to hotel groups seeking control and customization. Yanolja, with a focus on distribution, offers extensive OTA connections and a user-friendly dashboard for quick updates, suitable for properties prioritizing wide visibility. If your hotel needs an all-in-one management system, DJUBO is the better fit; if your main goal is distribution and occupancy optimization, Yanolja is preferable.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive platform covering reservations, billing, guest feedback, and revenue optimization, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its high ratings for ease of use (4.86/5) and strong customer support (4.78/5) suggest a reliable, user-friendly experience, especially for small to mid-sized hotels in emerging markets.
Conversely, if your hotel relies on extensive distribution channels to drive bookings and you want real-time OTA updates, Yanolja’s broad network of 157 verified partners and proven synchronization make it the superior option. Its large global footprint and robust connectivity are vital for properties aiming for maximum online visibility.
For hotels with complex management needs and multi-channel control, DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform. If your focus is on expanding reach via OTAs and reducing overbookings, choose Yanolja.
DJUBO’s user interface has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.86/5, praised for its straightforward navigation and simple onboarding process. Customers mention its intuitive workflows and modular setup, making staff adoption smooth, especially for small teams.
Yanolja also ranks highly at 4.81/5, with users emphasizing its clean design and responsive support team. Many reviews highlight the platform’s ease of managing multiple channels from a single dashboard, though some note that navigating certain features can require additional clicks.
Edge: DJUBO, thanks to its slightly higher rating and detailed positive feedback about its user experience.
DJUBO offers 24 features exclusive to its platform, including a POS, revenue management, guest feedback, and dynamic pricing, making it a versatile all-in-one solution. It also includes a property management system, booking engine, and multiple modules for group bookings, metasearch, and reporting.
Yanolja provides only one feature unique to its platform—centralized user & role management—but boasts a vast network of 157 integrations, including major OTAs and GDS. Its core strength lies in distribution, not in offering as many features as DJUBO.
Edge: DJUBO, with a broader and more diverse feature set tailored to comprehensive property management.
DJUBO’s support scores a strong 4.78/5, with reviews noting their responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Customers describe the support team as proactive and quick to resolve issues, especially for small and medium hotels seeking guidance.
Yanolja edges slightly ahead with a 4.83/5 rating, with numerous reviews praising their patience, responsiveness, and support during onboarding and troubleshooting. Users report that their support team consistently exceeds expectations, crucial for global hotels with complex needs.
Edge: Yanolja, for its marginally higher support ratings and detailed customer praise.
Yanolja’s extensive network includes 157 verified partners, such as Xero, QuickBooks, and Profitroom, providing a broad array of integrations for accounting, PMS, and marketing. This allows hotels to connect diverse systems and automate workflows efficiently.
DJUBO maintains a smaller but focused list of 3 verified integrations, including industry players like Tripadvisor and Simplotel. Its integrations primarily support core hotel operations but are limited compared to Yanolja’s extensive network.
Edge: Yanolja, thanks to its comprehensive and diverse integration ecosystem.
Considering recent reviews, Yanolja’s user base of over 900 hotels demonstrates a high level of satisfaction, especially among independent hotels and resorts. Its recent review scores are consistently close to 5/5, with many users emphasizing ease of use and support.
DJUBO, with only 18 reviews, still maintains a high overall score of 4.75/5, but the limited number of recent reviews makes its rating less current. Hoteliers in emerging markets or smaller properties tend to favor DJUBO for its all-in-one approach.
Edge: Yanolja, based on the volume of recent, positive feedback and higher overall ratings.
DJUBO does not publicly list its pricing; it offers modular modules and a custom quote based on hotel size and needs. This makes it flexible but requires direct inquiry for exact costs.
Yanolja’s base price is $100 per month, with no implementation fee, and offers a 30-day trial. Additional modules are paid separately, which could increase costs but allows for tailored packages.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive OTA distribution or GDS connectivity, as DJUBO’s integrations are limited.
Not ideal if your property prefers an all-in-one management solution with built-in PMS or revenue management, as Yanolja’s core strength is distribution.
Yanolja’s key advantage is its extensive distribution network, making it ideal for properties that depend on OTA bookings to fill rooms. Its recent reviews and high user ratings underscore its reliability and global presence.
DJUBO offers a wider feature set for property management, guest feedback, and revenue optimization, suited for properties seeking a unified platform. Its high ease-of-use and strong support make it a compelling choice for smaller teams.
In summary, choose Yanolja if your main goal is maximizing reach and reducing distribution headaches. Opt for DJUBO if your focus is on integrated property management and operational control.
La tarification des Gestionnaires de canaux est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Djubo (Instaconnekt) et Yanolja Channel Manager partagent 15 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 13 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 2 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We can now manage every property in our franchise from a single dashboard, track performance instantly, and know that our team has 24/7 support whenever it’s needed. It has complet..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Having used YCS’s solutions and services for the past three years, I highly recommend them to everyone. The local Business Development Manager and 24/7 support are invaluable. We c..."
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
The platform is commended for its user-friendly interface, which allows for simplified management of OTA connections. Its ease of use helps in onboard... The platform is commended for its user-friendly interface, which allows for simplified management of OTA connections. Its ease of use helps in onboarding new staff quickly, improving hotel operations significantly.
eZee Centrix is praised for its reliable OTA distribution and efficacy in maintaining wide coverage across OTAs and direct platforms. This extensive n... eZee Centrix is praised for its reliable OTA distribution and efficacy in maintaining wide coverage across OTAs and direct platforms. This extensive network ensures that inventory is updated seamlessly, supporting hoteliers in optimizing their occupancy.
eZee Centrix allows users to easily manage OTA rates and inventory. Users appreciate its seamless updates, especially the ability to set different pri... eZee Centrix allows users to easily manage OTA rates and inventory. Users appreciate its seamless updates, especially the ability to set different prices for weekdays and weekends. The ability to quickly adjust pricing strategies based on demand helps properties remain competitive.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Les utilisateurs ont souligné leur besoin d'améliorations en matière de personnalisation des rapports, de performances mobiles et de fonctionnalités s... Les utilisateurs ont souligné leur besoin d'améliorations en matière de personnalisation des rapports, de performances mobiles et de fonctionnalités supplémentaires. Des tableaux de bord améliorés, des analyses plus approfondies et des extensions de fonctionnalités pour les applications mobiles figurent parmi les demandes récurrentes.
Bien qu'authentiques et utiles, les fonctionnalités de reporting d'eZee Centrix pourraient être améliorées, selon certains utilisateurs. Il est notamm... Bien qu'authentiques et utiles, les fonctionnalités de reporting d'eZee Centrix pourraient être améliorées, selon certains utilisateurs. Il est notamment suggéré d'ajouter des analyses plus détaillées et personnalisables afin de faciliter la prise de décision et l'élaboration de stratégies.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Cela depend de vos besoins. Djubo (Instaconnekt) et Yanolja Channel Manager partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Channel Managers de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Djubo (Instaconnekt) propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Yanolja Channel Manager en propose 157. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Djubo (Instaconnekt) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.8/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Djubo (Instaconnekt) : Non. Yanolja Channel Manager : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Channel Managers proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. DJUBO a un HT Score de 0 et Yanolja Cloud Solution a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits