The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 11 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
GET IT Corporation se distingue .
Premium Parking se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Access Gate Hardware and Virtual Parking Permits.
Notes comparees basees sur 11 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 11 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Gestion du stationnement pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) | — | #2 2 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #2 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | — | #2 1 avis |
| Luxe | — | #2 1 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 10 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 6 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #2 10 avis |
Choosing a parking management system for your hotel hinges on understanding what each solution offers and how well it aligns with your operational needs. Product A, Get Parking by GET IT Corporation, is a driver-centric, digital self-parking platform aimed at providing a frictionless parking experience. Product B, GLIDEPARCS by Premium Parking, is a full-stack, gateless parking management system designed to optimize revenue and enhance customer satisfaction. Both address parking efficiency, but do they serve the same hotel type or operational scale?
While Get Parking emphasizes remote payments, flexible configurations, and integration with management systems, GLIDEPARCS offers comprehensive PARCS, digital payments, reservations, enforcement, and analytics. The key question remains: which aligns better with your hotel's size, guest expectations, and operational complexity?
Get Parking and GLIDEPARCS both aim to streamline your parking operations, but they approach the problem differently. Get Parking focuses on driver engagement through SMS, remote payments, and customizable workflows, making it suitable if your hotel prioritizes a digital, contactless experience. In contrast, GLIDEPARCS delivers a robust, gateless system with integrated revenue control, reservations, and enforcement features, ideal if your hotel seeks a comprehensive, all-in-one parking solution.
The main divergence is in scope: Get Parking excels at simplifying guest interactions and managing multiple locations, whereas GLIDEPARCS emphasizes operational control and revenue management through advanced hardware and analytics. Do you need a user-friendly, guest-facing platform or an enterprise-level management system? That decision determines the better fit.
If your hotel needs a driver-focused platform that enhances guest convenience with mobile payments, remote notifications, and easy configuration, go with Get Parking. It is particularly suited for properties that want to integrate parking seamlessly into the guest journey without heavy hardware investments.
If your hotel requires a full-stack, gateless management system with features like PARCS, reservations, enforcement, and extensive analytics, choose GLIDEPARCS. It is best for larger hotels or resorts aiming to maximize operational efficiency and revenue control with minimal manual intervention.
For boutique hotels or properties with a high emphasis on guest experience and digital engagement, Get Parking is the stronger choice. Conversely, for hotels with complex operations needing detailed analytics and integrated enforcement, GLIDEPARCS offers a comprehensive platform.
Get Parking has a limited but highly rated onboarding process, with a perfect 5/5 score for onboarding and a 4.73/5 ease of use rating. Users commend its straightforward setup, simple SMS link delivery, and intuitive guest interface, making staff adoption simple and quick.
GLIDEPARCS, with a 4.73/5 ease of use rating and a strong support score of 4.95/5, is also highly rated in user-friendliness. Its platform is designed to integrate hardware and software smoothly, but it may require more initial training due to its broader feature set.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — Its slightly higher review count and recent positive feedback suggest a more established, proven ease of use at scale.
Get Parking offers three core features, including SMS-based payments, remote notifications, and multi-location configurations, making it flexible for digital-first hotels. It lacks hardware integration or virtual permits, limiting its scope to digital management.
GLIDEPARCS provides five key features: PARCS, digital payments, reservations, validations, and enforcement with online marketing. It also introduces access gate hardware and virtual parking permits—features absent in Get Parking, enabling broader operational control and revenue management.
The feature count favors GLIDEPARCS, especially with hardware integration and permit management.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — Its additional hardware and permit features give it a more complete suite for complex operations.
Get Parking's support ratings are not available, but user reviews highlight the flexibility and reliability of the platform. The limited review data makes support harder to evaluate definitively.
GLIDEPARCS boasts a 4.95/5 customer support rating, with users praising its rapid response times and proactive engagement. Its onboarding is rated 5/5, indicating excellent support during implementation and ongoing operations.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — The consistently high reviews and recent positive feedback make its support stand out.
Get Parking connects with three verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality and Premium Parking, giving it a broader integration ecosystem. This flexibility allows hotels to link with existing management, POS, and revenue systems.
GLIDEPARCS has only one verified partner, but this includes core parking management and enforcement tools. Its limited integrations may restrict cross-platform connectivity, but it ensures tight, tested compatibility.
Edge: Get Parking — More verified partners enhance flexibility and integration options.
Get Parking has no recent reviews or ratings, which limits confidence in its current performance. Its lack of recent data suggests less market traction or recent updates.
GLIDEPARCS, by comparison, has 11 reviews within the last six months, all with high satisfaction scores. Its 4.91/5 overall rating and 9.73/10 NPS indicate strong, recent approval from users across various hotel segments.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — More recent reviews and higher ratings make it the more trusted choice today.
Pricing for Get Parking is not publicly available, which may suggest custom quotes based on property size or features. The lack of transparent pricing could be a barrier for some hotels.
GLIDEPARCS also does not publish specific prices but emphasizes a no-trial, no-implementation fee model, implying custom quotes. Both solutions likely require direct consultation to determine costs, making comparison difficult.
Not ideal if your hotel requires integrated gate hardware, enforcement, or detailed analytics.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, mobile-first solution with minimal hardware or extensive analytics.
Get Parking offers a streamlined, digital-focused parking experience, emphasizing guest convenience and configuration flexibility, making it ideal for boutique hotels or properties prioritizing guest engagement. Its limited hardware and analytics features mean it's better suited for hotels with straightforward needs and a digital-first approach.
GLIDEPARCS provides a comprehensive, hardware-enabled parking management system with enforcement, reservations, and detailed analytics, making it suitable for larger, complex properties seeking operational control and revenue maximization. Its strong recent reviews and high support ratings reinforce its reliability for enterprise-level hotels.
If your hotel values ease of use and recent positive feedback, GLIDEPARCS is the safer bet, especially given its broader feature set and proven market presence. However, if your focus is on digital guest engagement with minimal hardware, Get Parking could meet your needs—just be aware of its limited recent review data.
In conclusion, for modern, larger hotels or resorts seeking an all-in-one solution with extensive operational features, GLIDEPARCS is the clear choice. For properties emphasizing guest experience and digital simplicity, Get Parking is worth considering, but verify current support and feature updates first.
La tarification des Gestion du stationnement est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|---|
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Get Parking et GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking) partagent 3 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Permis de stationnement virtuels | ||
| Quincaillerie de porte d'accès |
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Get Parking et GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Parking Management de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Get Parking propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking) en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Get Parking : Non. GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Parking Management proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. GET IT Corporation a un HT Score de 0 et Premium Parking a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété