The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 82 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Hostaway se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Financial Reporting and Guest Portal.
Kigo se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 82 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 82 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 82 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Hostaway apprecient surtout customer support quality, onboarding experience, automation and efficiency, tandis que ceux de Kigo mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Customer Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégrations de logiciels tiers
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Personnalisation et contrôle de l'utilisateur
▾
|
|
|
−
Traitement financier et des paiements
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Challenges
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de location de vacances pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 23 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 19 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #2 4 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #1 3 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 14 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #2 9 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 6 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 8 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #1 47 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 17 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #1 7 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #1 2 avis | — |
Choosing between Hostaway and Kigo hinges on your specific needs as a vacation rental manager. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, but Hostaway offers a more established presence and a richer feature set backed by extensive reviews. Kigo, while comprehensive, has a smaller user base and fewer recent reviews, making Hostaway the more proven choice for most hoteliers.
Hostaway’s more recent reviews and higher ratings provide a more reliable gauge of performance, especially in customer support, ease of use, and feature depth. As a property manager or owner, your decision should depend on your operational complexity and growth plans, but the data leans heavily toward Hostaway.
Hostaway and Kigo both serve vacation rental managers but differ significantly in their market presence and feature availability. Hostaway excels in automation, integrations, and support, making it ideal for scaling property portfolios and professional operators. Kigo, by contrast, offers a broader suite of tools focused on maximizing revenue and simplifying management, but its smaller review count and less recent feedback limit confidence in its current performance.
Hostaway’s 80 reviews in the last six months with a 93.02 score and 5-star overall rating reflect strong, recent hotelier satisfaction. Meanwhile, Kigo’s absence of recent reviews and a 0 overall rating suggest limited current user engagement and less reliability. Would your hotel prioritize proven support and automation or a broader revenue focus?
Hostaway’s user experience is highly rated, with a 4.63/5 ease of use score based on 80 reviews, and most users praise its intuitive interface and onboarding process. Support staff are noted for their quick, thorough assistance, contributing to a smoother learning curve. Users highlight how its platform simplifies multi-channel management, even for beginners.
Kigo’s user feedback is lacking, as it has no recent reviews or ratings available. Without direct feedback, it’s unclear how user-friendly or accessible Kigo is for hoteliers. Based on available data, Edge: Hostaway.
Hostaway offers 10 features exclusive to its platform, including financial reporting, owner statements, a guest portal, mobile app, and a channel manager. These features address core operational needs, offering deep financial insights and automation tools. In contrast, Kigo doesn’t specify unique features or competitive functionalities in the available data.
The comprehensive feature set of Hostaway—especially its owner and guest portals, responsiveness, and customizable integrations—sets it apart. Kigo’s offerings appear more generalized, but without detailed feature comparison data, the edge clearly goes to Hostaway.
Hostaway’s customer support is highly rated at 4.75/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, availability, and helpfulness. Users like the 24/5 live chat support and dedicated onboarding help, which many find critical during setup and ongoing operations.
Kigo’s support ratings and recent reviews are unavailable, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in property management, Hostaway’s proven high ratings position it as the superior choice. Edge: Hostaway.
Hostaway boasts 14 verified partners, including major players like Airbnb, VRBO, and PriceLabs, plus a suite of unique integrations such as Stripe, Duve, and Breezeway. Its extensive partner network offers flexibility and efficiency for property managers seeking a connected ecosystem.
Kigo, with only 2 verified partners—Airbnb and PriceLabs—has limited integration options. This significantly restricts automation and operational flow, especially for complex portfolios. Hostaway’s broader integration ecosystem provides a clear advantage. Edge: Hostaway.
Hostaway’s recent reviews (80 in the past six months) reflect a hotelier-rated score of 93.02, with an overall rating of 5/5 and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Property types like hotels, inns, and vacation rentals rate it highly, highlighting its versatility across segments.
Kigo lacks recent reviews and ratings altogether, making it impossible to assess current user satisfaction. Based on available data, hoteliers favor Hostaway’s proven performance and recent feedback. Edge: Hostaway.
Pricing information for both platforms is not publicly disclosed, which is typical for enterprise SaaS solutions. Expect to receive custom quotes based on your property count and feature needs.
Since both are commercial SaaS platforms without clear published prices, consider them comparable in cost—your hotel’s size and requirements will be the determining factors.
Not ideal if your hotel has very few properties or prefers a simple, less integrated system.
Not ideal if you require extensive recent reviews or prefer proven, high-touch support. Also, if your property management needs are basic, Kigo’s broad feature set might be more than you need.
Hostaway’s core advantage lies in its extensive, recent reviews, high satisfaction ratings, and broad feature set backed by a large user base. Its focus on automation, integrations, and support makes it well-suited for growing property portfolios and professional operators.
Choose Hostaway if you value proven reliability, a strong support network, and a platform that scales with your business. Its advanced automation and financial tools provide tangible operational benefits.
Kigo, although comprehensive, currently lacks the recent user feedback and review volume to confidently recommend it for active hoteliers. It may appeal to owners who prioritize revenue management and simple web integration, but its limited recent data makes it a less certain choice.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers actively managing or scaling vacation rentals, Hostaway remains the superior, more trusted choice based on current review data. Its extensive features, support quality, and recent positive feedback set a clear standard in the market.
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Hostaway et Kigo partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Application mobile | ||
| Conception réactive | ||
| Financial Reporting | ||
| Guest Portal | ||
| Owner Statements | ||
| Tarifs promotionnels et négociés |
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Overall, customers are pleased with customer support, highlighting quick, effective responses and personal attention from service agents. Nonetheless,... Overall, customers are pleased with customer support, highlighting quick, effective responses and personal attention from service agents. Nonetheless, some mention long hold times or the need for more real-time support options.
Hostaway's onboarding support is widely commended, with consultants like Ramon, Jeriko, and others praised for their dedication and expertise. Users a... Hostaway's onboarding support is widely commended, with consultants like Ramon, Jeriko, and others praised for their dedication and expertise. Users appreciate their patience and detailed walkthroughs, making complex integrations feel seamless. However, some suggest extending the duration of onboarding calls for more comprehensive support.
The platform's automation capabilities, including central reservation management and automated communication tools, are recognized for saving time and... The platform's automation capabilities, including central reservation management and automated communication tools, are recognized for saving time and reducing manual errors. These features improve overall operational efficiency and help manage multiple properties with ease.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Les utilisateurs apprécient l'interface intuitive, mais souhaitent davantage d'options de personnalisation, notamment pour la gestion des appareils mo... Les utilisateurs apprécient l'interface intuitive, mais souhaitent davantage d'options de personnalisation, notamment pour la gestion des appareils mobiles, les modèles de messages et la flexibilité du site web. Ils réclament des améliorations des outils afin d'offrir une expérience utilisateur plus personnalisée.
Les systèmes de paiement intégrés sont généralement satisfaisants, mais les limitations de certains processeurs comme Stripe, l'absence de facturation... Les systèmes de paiement intégrés sont généralement satisfaisants, mais les limitations de certains processeurs comme Stripe, l'absence de facturation directe et la complexité des rapports financiers constituent des inconvénients notables. Les utilisateurs suggèrent d'élargir les options de paiement et de simplifier les opérations financières.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Hostaway et Kigo partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Vacation Rental Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Hostaway propose 14 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Kigo en propose 2. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Hostaway est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Hostaway : Non. Kigo : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Vacation Rental Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Hostaway a un HT Score de 93 et Kigo a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits