The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 105 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Jaras se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise and Revenue management module.
Sirvoy se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Notes comparees basees sur 105 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $1,000/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 105 |
Apres analyse de 105 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Jaras apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Sirvoy mettent en avant customer support, ease of use, gestion des réservations. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Gestion des réservations
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface utilisateur et conception
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Limitations fonctionnelles
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et adaptabilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Coût et rapport qualité-prix
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #22 36 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #48 3 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #46 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #27 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #37 7 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #42 4 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #35 3 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #23 16 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #13 6 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #27 0 avis |
Choosing between Jaras by Jaras and Sirvoy hinges on your property’s specific needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but their core capabilities and target audiences differ markedly. Jaras offers a comprehensive, enterprise-level platform with automation and extensive integrations, while Sirvoy focuses on simplicity and ease of use for smaller properties. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current scale and future plans?
Jaras is a newly launched, cloud-native property management system with a broad feature set, but it lacks customer reviews and a proven track record. Sirvoy, meanwhile, has amassed 95 reviews in recent months, with a high 94% likelihood to recommend and a strong customer satisfaction score. Is adopting a system with more proven support and user feedback the safer choice?
Jaras aims to serve mid-sized to large properties needing a unified automation platform that handles reservations, financial workflows, and channel distribution from a single dashboard. It integrates with over 150 online channels and offers features like revenue management, digital registration, and operational automation, making it suitable for hotels with complex operational needs. However, its lack of reviews raises questions about its maturity and real-world performance.
Sirvoy, on the other hand, is designed for small to medium-sized hotels, B&Bs, and hostels seeking an intuitive, lightweight management system. Its core features include a booking engine, channel management, and payment processing, all wrapped in an easy-to-navigate interface. With 95 reviews and a 4.64/5 ease-of-use rating, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it a safer bet for hoteliers prioritizing reliability and straightforward workflows.
If your hotel needs automation, extensive integrations, and scalable features, Jaras might be the preferred choice. But if user-friendliness, customer support, and tangible user feedback matter most, Sirvoy is the more trustworthy option. Do you prioritize growth and automation or proven simplicity and support?
If your hotel is a growing property or portfolio requiring advanced automation, channel connectivity, and detailed operational insights, go with Jaras. Its financial management tools, revenue modules, and 150+ OTA integrations support scaling and complex workflows.
If your hotel values ease of use, rapid onboarding, and a strong support reputation, Sirvoy is the better fit. It’s especially suitable for small-to-midsize properties that want reliable reservation management, a user-friendly interface, and excellent customer support without the complexity of larger systems.
Hotels planning to expand or add automation features should lean toward Jaras for its scalability. Conversely, hotels seeking quick deployment, minimal training, and trusted support should pick Sirvoy.
Sirvoy boasts a 4.64/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews from 95 users, who describe it as intuitive and simple to navigate. Support is highly rated at 4.85/5, with users praising its quick responses, helpfulness, and straightforward onboarding process. Many reviewers mention that staff adoption was seamless and that the system’s design reduces training time.
Jaras, however, currently has no user ratings or reviews, making its ease of use and onboarding process uncertain. Its complex feature set suggests a steep learning curve, potentially requiring more extensive training and support.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Jaras offers 16 features, including unique capabilities like on-premise deployment, digital registration, and a revenue management module. These features cater to properties needing more advanced control over operations and automation, especially with a focus on financial workflows and unit management.
Sirvoy provides 30 features, including multi-currency handling, transactional emails, guest communication (SMS), integrated payment processing, a booking engine, and a website builder. It also offers features like group bookings, task management, and real-time reporting, which are absent in Jaras.
Given the broader feature set and proven implementations, Sirvoy edges ahead for properties wanting a well-rounded, versatile system. However, if your hotel needs specialized features like revenue management or digital registration, Jaras’s unique tools may be more relevant.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s support is highly praised, with a 4.85/5 rating and a 9.41/10 NPS score from recent reviews. Users describe the support team as responsive, helpful, and quick to assist with onboarding and troubleshooting, often noting that support staff go “above and beyond” to help new users get started smoothly.
Jaras currently has no reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its customer service quality. The lack of feedback raises concerns about how well the company’s support infrastructure can assist during implementation or issues.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Jaras does not currently have any verified integrations, which limits its connectivity to other systems and channels. This could pose challenges if your hotel relies on specific third-party tools or distribution channels.
Sirvoy offers 21 verified integrations, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems. It also connects with revenue management, marketing, and payment providers such as TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Revinate, providing a more comprehensive ecosystem.
For hotels that depend on multi-channel distribution and third-party integrations, Sirvoy clearly leads. Jaras’s lack of integrations suggests it may not yet support scalable or integrated workflows.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Since Jaras has no reviews, there’s no data on hotel ratings or segment-specific feedback. Conversely, Sirvoy’s recent reviews showcase a high satisfaction score, with a 94% likelihood to recommend across various property types, including B&Bs, hostels, resorts, and boutique hotels.
Reviewers of Sirvoy praise its ease of use, customer support, and value for money, with many mentioning that the system has improved their daily operations. The high review count and recent positive feedback make Sirvoy the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Jaras’s pricing is listed at a $1,000 base price, with no monthly fees, freemium options, or trial periods noted. Its high upfront cost suggests it targets larger properties or portfolios willing to invest in a comprehensive system.
Sirvoy’s pricing is significantly lower at $200 per month, with a 30-day trial available. Its flexible subscription model and affordability appeal to small to medium-sized hotels seeking an accessible, cost-effective solution.
Considering the proven value and recent reviews, Sirvoy offers better cost-effectiveness for most hoteliers. Jaras’s higher price point might only be justified if its advanced features significantly impact your operations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, prefers simple systems, or lacks the resources for extensive onboarding and training.
Not ideal if your hotel demands advanced automation, complex revenue management, or extensive integrations.
Jaras presents a fresh, comprehensive platform designed for scalable property management, but it currently lacks reviews and proven real-world performance. If your hotel can invest in a new system and values automation and extensive integrations, Jaras could be worth considering once it establishes a track record.
Sirvoy, with over 95 recent reviews and a 94% recommendation rate, stands out as the more reliable and user-approved solution. It excels in ease of use, customer support, and affordability, making it a safe choice for small to mid-sized hotels seeking efficiency and support.
Ultimately, if you need a proven, highly-rated system with extensive features and support, Sirvoy is the clear pick. For properties ready to pioneer a new platform and requiring advanced automation, Jaras might be worth exploring further once it matures.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Jaras et Sirvoy partagent 13 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Inscription numérique | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Sur place | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Affichage des principales differences. 21 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, com... Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, comme la possibilité de regrouper des chambres en suites ou de proposer des forfaits, sont jugées perfectibles.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien... Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien et le besoin de fonctionnalités financières et de facturation améliorées. Des retours font également état du manque d'options CRM avancées et de difficultés d'intégration des fonctionnalités de vente incitative.
Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établis... Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établissement. Toutefois, certains utilisateurs aimeraient une plus grande flexibilité dans la personnalisation des factures et des options de facturation dynamiques.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Jaras et Sirvoy partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Jaras propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sirvoy en propose 21. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Sirvoy est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Jaras : Non. Sirvoy : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Jaras a un HT Score de 0 et Sirvoy a 85. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits