MyStay Check in vs. Speeron Guest Experience System:
Qual è Quello Giusto per Te?

The Decision

When evaluating contactless check-in solutions, your goal is to find a system that reduces costs, streamlines operations, and enhances guest experience. Both MyStay Check-in by MyStay and Ulyses Tesipro aim to address these needs, but their capabilities and market presence differ significantly. MyStay's extensive review base and feature set make it the more proven choice, especially for hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported solution.

Are you ready to choose the more established platform that can deliver measurable results?

Quick Verdict

MyStay Check-in leads the comparison with a 5/5 overall rating based on 40 recent reviews, a high NPS of 9.8, and a broad global presence. Ulyses Tesipro has no recent reviews, no publicly available ratings, and no verified integrations, making it difficult to assess its effectiveness or support quality. For hotels prioritizing proven performance and ongoing support, MyStay is the clear winner.

Is MyStay or Ulyses Tesipro Better for Hotels?

Both products aim to automate and simplify contactless check-in and check-out processes, but MyStay offers a comprehensive solution with 14 exclusive features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, and multi-channel communication. Ulyses Tesipro, by contrast, has no features listed or verified integrations, which raises questions about its capabilities.

MyStay’s integrations with multiple partners and regional presence across six continents demonstrate its reliability and scalability, while Ulyses Tesipro’s lack of such data suggests it’s either new, less mature, or less supported. Given the current review data, MyStay provides a more robust and trusted platform, but the absence of recent feedback on Ulyses Tesipro makes it difficult to recommend confidently.

Are you prepared to rely on a platform with proven market traction and comprehensive features?

MyStay vs Ulyses Tesipro: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a contactless check-in system that integrates seamlessly with your existing PMS, supports digital signatures and online payments, and offers multi-channel communication, go with MyStay. Its 40 reviews with an average 5/5 rating and recent positive feedback confirm its effectiveness.

If your hotel is exploring new options without immediate need for proven integrations or extensive features, Ulyses Tesipro might be considered, but the lack of recent review data and verified features makes this a risky choice. For most hoteliers, especially those in need of a reliable, well-supported product, MyStay is the safer, more effective option.

Is MyStay or Ulyses Tesipro Easier to Use?

MyStay boasts a 4.91/5 ease of use rating from 40 reviews, with hoteliers praising its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Users frequently mention how quickly staff can onboard and start using the system, describing it as "very simple" and "efficient," especially for properties aiming for quick deployment.

Ulyses Tesipro, however, has no available ratings or reviews, leaving user experience and onboarding effectiveness unverified. Without concrete data, it's impossible to assess its usability.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has Better Features: MyStay or Ulyses Tesipro?

MyStay offers 14 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, multi-channel messaging, digital payments, and self-service check-in/out. These tools directly support operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.

Ulyses Tesipro provides no documented features or integrations, which raises doubts about its functionality and completeness. With a clear feature advantage and verified capabilities, MyStay is the better choice for hotels seeking a feature-rich, reliable system.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has Better Customer Support: MyStay or Ulyses Tesipro?

MyStay’s support ratings are outstanding, with a 4.93/5 score based on 40 recent reviews, and hoteliers describe the team as "very responsive" and "helpful." Reviewers particularly appreciate prompt technical assistance, which is critical for smooth implementation and operation.

Ulyses Tesipro has no available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, this lack of data favors MyStay.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has More Integrations: MyStay or Ulyses Tesipro?

MyStay integrates with over 30 verified partners, including well-known property management and channel management solutions like Kwentra, RoomRaccoon, and WuBook. This extensive partner network ensures compatibility with various hotel management ecosystems.

Ulyses Tesipro offers no listed integrations or partnerships, raising questions about its connectivity and scalability. Based on the available data, MyStay’s broad integration options make it the more adaptable platform.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: MyStay or Ulyses Tesipro?

MyStay’s recent reviews reflect a 5/5 average rating from 40 users, with 98% likelihood to recommend and an NPS of 9.8, indicating strong satisfaction across diverse hotel segments. Hotels in Europe, North America, and other regions particularly praise its ease of use, features, and support.

Ulyses Tesipro has no recent reviews or ratings, preventing a comparison. The absence of feedback suggests it may lack the market traction or proven user satisfaction that MyStay demonstrates.

Edge: MyStay.

How Much Do MyStay and Ulyses Tesipro Cost?

MyStay’s pricing starts at $400 per month without a free tier or trial, with no implementation fees. It offers a transparent, flat-rate model, making budgeting straightforward.

Ulyses Tesipro does not list any pricing information or trial options, making it difficult to assess value. The lack of pricing data favors MyStay, especially given its proven track record and feature set.

What Type of Hotel Should Use MyStay?

• Hotels that want a reliable, well-supported contactless check-in system with proven integrations.
• Properties seeking to reduce front desk costs by up to 85%.
• Hotels that prioritize guest satisfaction through automated communication and digital payments.
• Hotels with existing PMS looking for seamless integration.
• Properties aiming for quick deployment with minimal staff training.

Not ideal if:

• Your hotel relies heavily on manual processes with no need for automation.
• You operate in regions where MyStay doesn’t have regional support.
• Your property prefers a free or very low-cost solution with extensive customization.

Edge: Hotels needing proven, feature-rich solutions.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Ulyses Tesipro?

• Hotels that are willing to test an unproven platform without recent user feedback.
• Properties with in-house technical expertise to evaluate and integrate new solutions independently.
• Hotels operating in regions or segments where the vendor has a local presence or support.

Not ideal if:

• You require a reliable, tested contactless check-in system.
• Your hotel values extensive integrations and proven performance.
• You prefer a platform with documented features and recent customer satisfaction.

Ulyses Tesipro vs MyStay: The Bottom Line for Hotels

MyStay Check-in is a mature, proven solution with a comprehensive feature set, strong customer feedback, and an extensive partner network. Its high ratings and recent reviews confirm that it reliably reduces costs and enhances guest experience, making it suitable for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking a trusted vendor.

Ulyses Tesipro, lacking recent reviews, verified features, and integrations, presents significant unknowns about its effectiveness and support quality. It may suit niche markets or experimental projects but falls short for hotels prioritizing stability, support, and proven results.

In conclusion, if your hotel needs a contactless check-in system with a track record of success, go with MyStay. If you are exploring options without immediate requirements for a tested platform, Ulyses Tesipro might be worth monitoring, but it’s not recommended for your core operations today.