The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Caspeco se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Caspeco mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can make or break your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Caspeco PMS by Caspeco and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, regional needs, and specific feature priorities.
Caspeco offers a comprehensive, well-established platform primarily in Europe, while HotelTime is a globally active, feature-rich solution with a broader integration ecosystem. Which will better align with your hotel’s growth plans and operational complexity?
Caspeco PMS claims to provide all-in-one hotel operations management, including reservations, invoicing, and housekeeping, mainly targeting European markets. HotelTime, with more than 650 properties across 20+ countries, emphasizes its cloud-based flexibility, extensive integrations, and broad feature set.
While Caspeco’s review count is zero and lacks recent user feedback, HotelTime’s 433 reviews, with 27 in the last six months, provide a clearer picture of current strengths and weaknesses. HotelTime’s recent reviews praise its operational efficiency and ease of use, whereas Caspeco’s lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess its current performance or user sentiment.
Is your hotel seeking a proven, well-reviewed platform with recent user feedback? If so, HotelTime’s current market presence and recent reviews give it a clear edge.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, European-focused PMS with familiar functionalities, Caspeco might seem attractive; however, the lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it risky. For hotels seeking a globally proven solution with extensive features and active support, HotelTime is the safer choice.
HotelTime’s broader feature set—over 51 exclusive features, including integrated CRS, guest CRM, online check-in, and automated night audits—caters to properties of all sizes. Caspeco’s minimal feature count and lack of verified integrations suggest it’s less suitable for hotels with complex or multi-department needs.
If operational flexibility and proven support are priorities, choose HotelTime. If you prefer a smaller, possibly more tailored option in Europe, consider Caspeco, but be wary of the limited recent data.
Based on available ratings, HotelTime scores 4.66/5 for ease of use, with reviewers citing its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding process. Caspeco’s rating is zero, indicating no recent, verified user feedback on usability, making it impossible to judge.
HotelTime’s recent reviews praise its user-friendly design and quick staff adoption, although some mention that initial module setup can be complex. Caspeco’s lack of recent reviews prevents a fair comparison, but the absence suggests less current user engagement or feedback.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts over 51 features exclusive to its platform, including booking engine, channel management, POS integration, guest CRM, and automation tools, offering a comprehensive management suite. Caspeco, with no verified features or integrations, appears to have a more limited scope, focusing on core functionalities.
HotelTime’s extensive feature set supports properties with diverse needs—from resorts to large hotels—while Caspeco’s minimal feature count suggests it’s less adaptable for complex operations.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team receives a 4.73/5 rating, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing support. Recent feedback describes HotelTime’s support as responsive and dedicated, crucial for smooth implementation.
Caspeco’s support score is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, it’s challenging to assess its support quality. The lack of recent feedback indicates that HotelTime’s support reputation is a significant advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 58 verified integrations, including channel managers, POS systems, and third-party modules, facilitating an interconnected hotel ecosystem. Caspeco, with zero verified partners, presents limited integration options, risking operational silos.
For hotels that rely on third-party systems or plan to expand integrations, HotelTime’s extensive partner network is a decisive advantage. Caspeco’s limited ecosystem might hinder scalable or complex setups.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 and NPS score of 9.26/10 reflect high user satisfaction, particularly among boutique, city center, and resort hotels, with recent reviews emphasizing its operational efficiency and support.
Caspeco’s ratings are nonexistent, indicating it lacks recent user feedback or active user engagement. HotelTime’s current high rating and positive reviews underscore its market leadership.
Edge: HotelTime.
Caspeco’s pricing is not publicly available, suggesting a tailored quote or potential higher costs that aren’t transparent. HotelTime charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation or setup fees, making costs predictable.
The transparent pricing of HotelTime allows hotels to evaluate ROI easily. Caspeco’s opaque pricing model could pose budgeting challenges, especially for smaller properties or those seeking clear cost structures.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that HotelTime delivers a widely adopted, feature-rich platform with active support and extensive integrations, while Caspeco remains less documented and lacks recent user feedback. HotelTime’s proven market presence and recent reviews make it a safer choice for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a scalable, robust PMS with high user satisfaction, go with HotelTime. It offers extensive features, active support, and a global presence, suitable for diverse property types.
Choose Caspeco if your hotel operates primarily in Europe, has simple management needs, and prefers a smaller, potentially more tailored solution. However, be aware of the limited recent feedback and integrations, which could impact future scalability.
In summary, for most properties looking for reliable, well-supported, and feature-rich software, HotelTime is the clear winner. Caspeco may suit niche European hotels with minimal complexity but lacks the current user validation to recommend confidently.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Caspeco PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Caspeco PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Caspeco PMS oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Caspeco PMS: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Caspeco tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos