The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Flyhotel se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Flyhotel mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. You’re comparing Flyhotel by Flyhotel and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME—two platforms designed to streamline hotel management but with distinct differences. Flyhotel’s reviews are nonexistent, making HotelTime’s extensive recent feedback your most reliable data point. Given this, which platform is more suited for your needs?
Flyhotel, despite its clear focus as a comprehensive hotel operations tool, has no reviews or ratings available, which makes assessing its real-world performance and customer satisfaction impossible. Conversely, HotelTime PMS boasts over 433 reviews, with 27 in the last six months, emphasizing strong, recent user feedback that reflects current performance. HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend indicate high satisfaction levels, especially among hotels seeking a full-featured, reliable PMS.
Although Flyhotel claims to be scalable and cloud-based, the absence of user feedback leaves questions about ease of use, support, and actual feature implementation. HotelTime’s well-documented strengths in customer support, ease of use, and a broad suite of features suggest it’s the more trusted choice. Would your team be comfortable with an untested system, or do you prefer a platform backed by recent, positive user experiences?
If your hotel needs a scalable, cloud-based PMS with extensive integrations and features, HotelTime is the clear winner. It’s suitable for properties of all sizes—from independent hotels to large resort chains—and has demonstrated a track record of improving operations for over 650 properties across 20+ countries.
On the other hand, Flyhotel’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge its suitability or reliability. If you prioritize proven customer satisfaction, comprehensive features, and support, HotelTime is the safer, more proven option. If you’re an early adopter willing to take a risk without user feedback, Flyhotel might be worth exploring, but that’s not recommended for critical hotel operations.
HotelTime scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight that HotelTime is user-friendly, with most staff able to operate the system efficiently after training, supported by detailed onboarding and ongoing support.
Flyhotel, with a 0/5 rating in ease of use and no reviews available, provides no evidence of its usability or user experience. Its lack of feedback suggests it may not be as proven or refined as HotelTime, making it a risky choice if ease of adoption is a priority.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers a feature set of 51 modules, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, revenue management, online check-in, mobile app, and more. These features are designed to automate and improve nearly every aspect of hotel operations, with many features specifically tailored for larger and more complex properties.
Flyhotel, with zero features listed, provides no concrete evidence of its capabilities or feature depth. This absence suggests either a very limited offering or a lack of transparency. Given the extensive feature set of HotelTime, it’s the clear leader, especially for hotels seeking a fully integrated, feature-rich solution.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime scores a 4.73/5 in customer support, with reviews emphasizing quick, knowledgeable responses and effective onboarding. Reviewers recount support staff being highly responsive and helpful, which is vital during implementation and ongoing use.
Flyhotel has no reviews or ratings available, leaving no data to evaluate its support quality. The lack of user feedback raises concerns about the level of assistance your team might receive if issues arise.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, enabling seamless connections with booking engines, revenue tools, and other third-party systems. This extensive ecosystem allows for a flexible, scalable tech stack tailored to your hotel’s needs.
Flyhotel offers no verified integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with essential external systems. Without reliable integrations, managing operations and data flow may become cumbersome.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime has an overall rating of 4.83/5 based on 433 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting strong performance across small and large properties. Hotels in diverse segments, from boutique to resorts, consistently praise its ease of use, support, and features.
Flyhotel’s apparent lack of reviews means no recent hotel ratings or comments are available, making it impossible to assess how hoteliers perceive it in practice.
Edge: HotelTime.
Flyhotel does not publicly list a price, suggesting either a custom quote or an unpublicized model. Conversely, HotelTime charges a $600 monthly base fee, with no freemium or per-room charges, providing predictable costs for budgeting.
Without transparent pricing for Flyhotel, HotelTime’s clear rate simplifies decision-making. Higher upfront costs may be offset by the platform’s robust features and support.
The core difference: HotelTime provides a well-rounded, extensively reviewed platform with proven results, whereas Flyhotel offers no publicly available evidence of its performance or features.
Choose HotelTime if you value reliability, comprehensive features, and recent positive user feedback, especially given its strong customer support and broad integrations. It’s the safer option for hotels looking to improve operations without risking untested software.
If your hotel is willing to accept uncertainty and is seeking a highly customizable or niche system, Flyhotel might be worth exploring, but it’s not recommended based on current data.
For most hotels evaluating these options today, HotelTime stands out as the more dependable, feature-rich, and well-supported choice.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Flyhotel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Flyhotel e HotelTime PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Flyhotel e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Flyhotel oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Flyhotel: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Flyhotel tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos