FelhőMatrac vs. SHR Central Reservation System (CRS):
Welches ist das Richtige für Sie?

The Decision

Choosing the right hotel reservations software means balancing features, ease of use, support, and cost. FelhőMatrac, despite its minimal online presence and zero reviews, aims to offer reservation capabilities but lacks the reviews, recent adoption, and user feedback needed for confidence. In contrast, SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) boasts nearly 50 reviews, a high rating of 4.77/5, and recent positive feedback, making it the more viable option for your hotel today.

Both products address reservation management, but SHR's extensive feature set and proven track record outperform FelhőMatrac’s unverified offering. Do you want a product with modern, well-supported features or one that remains untested in the field?

---

Is FelhőMatrac or SHR Group Better for Hotels?

FelhőMatrac appears to be a basic reservation platform with no verified integrations, support, or recent reviews, raising questions about its current usability and reliability. SHR Group, on the other hand, has a comprehensive suite of 20 features, including channel management, booking engine, PMS integration, and revenue tools, all backed by the confidence of nearly 50 recent reviews and a 4.77/5 rating.

While FelhőMatrac might seem suitable for hotels seeking a straightforward solution, its lack of proven customer satisfaction or recent updates makes it less attractive. SHR’s proven performance and feature depth make it the safer, more scalable choice for your hotel’s future.

Would you prefer a historically untested solution or a platform with proven industry trust?

SHR Group vs FelhőMatrac: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a distributed, multi-channel reservation system with robust management tools, go with SHR. Its features support complex distribution networks, revenue management, and integration with existing PMS and RMS systems, making it suitable for hotels of all sizes—particularly those aiming to optimize revenue.

If, however, your hotel only requires a simple reservation system with minimal integration and you are willing to risk unverified support and feature quality, FelhőMatrac might suffice—though the lack of recent reviews and confirmed functionality make this a gamble. For most hotels seeking stability and growth, SHR is the clear choice.

Is FelhőMatrac or SHR Group Easier to Use?

SHR Group scores 4.61/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its user-friendly interface and responsive support team. Users highlight that SHR’s platform is “pretty easy to use,” with some navigation quirks but overall manageable for staff.

FelhőMatrac has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to determine its usability or onboarding experience. Given SHR's demonstrated support and recent user feedback, it clearly leads on usability.

Edge: SHR Group.

Which Has Better Features: FelhőMatrac or SHR Group?

SHR Group offers 20 features, including reporting dashboards, guest profiles, booking engine, OTA distribution, content management, and revenue controls—features FelhőMatrac does not display any. FelhőMatrac's feature set is either nonexistent or unverified, with no documented functionalities or unique selling points.

SHR’s rich feature set supports comprehensive hotel management, from distribution to revenue optimization. FelhőMatrac's lack of features and recent validation make SHR the superior choice.

Edge: SHR Group.

Which Has Better Customer Support: FelhőMatrac or SHR Group?

SHR Group’s customer support scores 4.76/5, with reviews citing prompt, personalized, and dependable service—hoteliers say, “The team at SHR has been very helpful with everything we’ve asked.” In contrast, FelhőMatrac has no available reviews or data on support quality, leaving its support capabilities unverified.

Given SHR’s proven support reputation and recent reviews, it offers significantly more confidence for your team’s success.

Edge: SHR Group.

Which Has More Integrations: FelhőMatrac or SHR Group?

SHR Group boasts 81 verified integrations, including PMS, RMS, CRMs, and OTA partners, ensuring your hotel can connect with a broad ecosystem of tools. FelhőMatrac has no verified integrations, limiting its flexibility and scalability for most hotels.

If your hotel relies on a connected tech stack, SHR’s extensive integration options make it the clear leader.

Edge: SHR Group.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: FelhőMatrac or SHR Group?

SHR Group’s overall rating of 4.77/5 from 49 reviews reflects strong, recent positive feedback across segments like independent, boutique, and branded hotels. Most reviews mention its reliability, support, and feature set, with one noting that SHR has helped exceed revenue targets.

FelhőMatrac has no reviews to evaluate, so it cannot be rated by hoteliers. SHR’s high rating and recent feedback make it the preferred choice.

Edge: SHR Group.

How Much Do FelhőMatrac and SHR Group Cost?

Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details, indicating possible customization based on hotel size and needs. FelhőMatrac offers no trial or transparent fee structure, while SHR also lacks published prices but emphasizes no implementation fees and no monthly charges.

Without concrete pricing, your decision should focus on value, features, and support, where SHR clearly demonstrates industry confidence.

What Type of Hotel Should Use FelhőMatrac?

• Hotels seeking a basic reservation platform with minimal complexity.
• Small properties or startups testing reservation systems with limited budget.
• Hotels with very simple distribution needs, not requiring integrations or advanced features.

Not ideal if:

• Your hotel requires reliable, scalable, feature-rich software.
• You need integrated distribution, revenue management, or comprehensive support.
• Your property benefits from a proven platform with current reviews.

What Type of Hotel Should Use SHR Group?

• Hotels that need robust distribution management across multiple channels.
• Properties aiming to optimize revenue with integrated revenue tools.
• Hotels seeking a system with extensive integrations and support.

Not ideal if:

• Your hotel prefers a simple, standalone reservation system.
• You are unable to commit to a platform with a more complex feature set.
• Your hotel has very limited technical needs or prefers a minimal setup.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference is that SHR Group is an established, feature-rich, actively-supported platform with a proven track record, while FelhőMatrac remains unreviewed and unverified. SHR’s 49 recent reviews and 4.77/5 rating showcase its reliability and customer satisfaction, making it the safer, more scalable choice.

Choose SHR if your hotel needs a comprehensive, well-supported reservation platform that can grow with your business. If your hotel only needs a very basic system and can accept the risks of unverified software, FelhőMatrac may be considered—but it’s not recommended for most.

For most hotels, SHR offers the confidence, features, and support to meet today’s demands. FelhőMatrac’s lack of recent validation makes it a risky, less-informed option for your reservation needs.