The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 18 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Asana destaca .
LIKE MAGIC destaca en ease of use and customer support , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile access on any device.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 18 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 2 | 16 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Herramientas de colaboración del personal para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #14 1 reseñas | #7 7 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #25 1 reseñas | #16 5 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | — | #19 2 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #17 5 reseñas |
| Lujo | #26 1 reseñas | #24 2 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | #26 1 reseñas | #25 1 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #8 8 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | #32 1 reseñas | #33 0 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | #23 1 reseñas | #6 15 reseñas |
When evaluating staff collaboration tools for your hotel, you face a choice between Asana and LIKE MAGIC. Both aim to improve team coordination and streamline operations, but they serve different needs. Asana is a well-established project management platform, while LIKE MAGIC is a hotel-specific, automation-driven guest experience platform. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products address operational inefficiencies, but they approach the problem differently. Asana focuses on task and project management for teams, whereas LIKE MAGIC automates guest interactions and routine tasks. Are you looking to enhance internal collaboration or guest-facing automation? That’s the core question.
The more recent reviews and the higher review count favor LIKE MAGIC. With 16 reviews in the last six months and a 99% likelihood to recommend, LIKE MAGIC’s data is more current and reliable. Asana’s only two reviews, both older, make its ratings less representative of today’s performance. So, which product do you trust more based on recent user feedback?
Both products aim to improve operational workflows, but they are designed for different aspects of hotel management. Asana offers a simple, flexible tool for task tracking and team communication, suitable for various industries but not purpose-built for hospitality. LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, is a dedicated hotel operations platform that automates guest interactions from booking to checkout.
Asana’s core strength lies in its ability to organize internal team tasks, with a 4/5 ease-of-use rating and mostly positive reviews about managing communication and teamwork. It’s used mainly by standard hotels and is appreciated for its versatility in non-hotel settings. However, its lack of hotel-specific features and integrations can be a drawback.
LIKE MAGIC excels in automating guest journeys with 12 unique features, including digital check-in, in-room dining, and automated messaging. Its 5/5 ease of use rating and near-perfect customer support score (4.88/5) reflect its hotel-specific design, making it ideal for properties seeking to reduce staff and enhance guest experiences. Which platform better suits your hotel’s operational focus?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
If your hotel needs a dedicated platform to automate guest interactions and reduce staffing costs, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its automation features—integrations with PMS, digital keys, guest messaging, and self-service capabilities—are unmatched and designed specifically for hotel operations.
If your team primarily needs a straightforward project management tool to organize internal tasks and improve communication, Asana is suitable, especially for hotels with smaller or less complex operations. However, given its limited hotel-specific features and the small volume of recent reviews, it’s less ideal for hotels aiming for digital guest experience enhancements.
For properties focused on internal team productivity without guest-facing automation, Asana could suffice. But for hotels committed to automating guest journeys and operational workflows, LIKE MAGIC offers a comprehensive, purpose-built solution. Which aligns with your immediate needs?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s interface is rated 4/5 and is praised for being simple and open, helping teams adopt the platform with some training. Its onboarding score (3/5) indicates a decent experience but may require internal effort to standardize usage across teams.
LIKE MAGIC’s interface scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with a nearly perfect onboarding score of 4.93/5. Its hotel-specific design minimizes staff training time and reduces onboarding friction, especially for properties with limited tech experience.
Based on recent reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s intuitive platform and quick setup give it a notable edge for hotels seeking rapid deployment without extensive training.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana offers 0 unique hotel-specific features, focusing mainly on task tracking, communication, and project management. Its strengths lie in general collaboration tools, but it lacks automation for guest services or operational workflows.
LIKE MAGIC provides 12 distinct features tailored for hospitality, including work prioritization, real-time task tracking, file libraries, automated replies, multi-property monitoring, and an open API. These features directly support automating guest interactions, staff workflows, and service delivery, making it the more feature-rich choice for hotels.
Given the hotel-specific features and integrations, LIKE MAGIC clearly stands out. If you need automation and guest journey management, it offers more relevant tools.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s customer support score of 2.5/5 reflects mixed reviews. Some users find it difficult to get timely help, and onboarding can be inconsistent, requiring additional internal effort.
LIKE MAGIC boasts a support rating of 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and dedicated assistance. Hotel clients praise the platform’s ongoing product evolution and attentive support, which enhances their operational confidence.
For hotels prioritizing reliable, responsive support, LIKE MAGIC’s high rating makes it the preferable option.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with hotel systems directly. This can restrict its usefulness in a hotel environment where seamless data flow is essential.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including PMS systems like 4SUITES, apaleo, and Mews, as well as payment and guest messaging platforms. These integrations streamline operations and reduce manual data entry.
If integrations are crucial for your hotel’s technology ecosystem, LIKE MAGIC’s broader connectivity provides a significant advantage.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s reviews are limited and older, with a 4.5/5 overall rating based on only 2 reviews. Its users appreciate its simplicity but note its lack of hotel-specific features.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews, totaling 16 in the last six months, give it a 4.88/5 customer support score and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across Europe and Asia Pacific, particularly extended stay and boutique properties, praise its automation and operational efficiencies.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s user ratings are more indicative of current performance and satisfaction.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana does not publicly disclose pricing, and it offers a free basic version limited to small teams. Larger teams or advanced features require custom pricing, which can be costly and complex to scale.
LIKE MAGIC charges a flat fee of $1,100 per month, with no free tier or trial. This fee grants access to its full suite of hotel-specific features and integrations.
For clarity and predictability, LIKE MAGIC’s straightforward pricing makes it easier for hotels to budget and evaluate ROI.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Asana is suitable for basic internal collaboration but less so for automating guest services.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
LIKE MAGIC is best for hotels committed to digital guest experience transformation.
The core difference lies in their purpose: Asana is a general project management tool, while LIKE MAGIC is tailored for hotel operations automation. If your priority is internal team collaboration without guest-facing features, Asana might suffice, but it lacks hotel-specific integrations and automation.
Choose Asana if your team needs a flexible internal collaboration platform and your hotel’s operations are simple. However, for hotels seeking to streamline guest interactions, automate workflows, and reduce staffing, LIKE MAGIC provides a more suitable, hotel-centric solution.
When to choose Asana: You’re focused on internal team productivity, have a small team, and don’t require guest automation. When to choose LIKE MAGIC: Your goal is to automate guest journeys, reduce staffing costs, and integrate seamlessly with your property systems.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction through automation, LIKE MAGIC is the stronger choice. Its recent reviews, hotel-specific features, and broader integrations make it the more reliable, future-proof solution.
Los precios de Herramientas de colaboración del personal rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Asana y LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestión de casos | ||
| Libro de registro virtual | ||
| Priorización del trabajo | ||
| Salidas tardías | ||
| Seguimiento de tareas en tiempo real | ||
| Soporte de biblioteca de archivos (imágenes, documentos y videos) |
Analizamos 4 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
Mejor posicionado en
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Asana y LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Staff Collaboration Tools, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Asana ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) ofrece 10. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) lidera en facilidad de uso con 5.0/5 vs 4.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Asana: No. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App): No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Staff Collaboration Tools ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Asana tiene un HT Score de 0 y LIKE MAGIC tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Recomendaciones personalizadas adaptadas a su propiedad.