The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 1,508 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Canary Technologies destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment & Authorizations and Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
Myra Self Check-in destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 1,508 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Reseñas verificadas | 1,508 | 0 |
Tras analizar 1,508 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Canary Technologies valoran más su contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, mientras que los usuarios de Myra Self Check-in destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Notificaciones automáticas
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Integración técnica
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Check-in sin contacto para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #2 98 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 1042 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 228 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #1 105 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 reseñas | — |
| Lujo ▾ | #1 573 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #1 680 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #1 116 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #1 1308 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #3 65 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #1 27 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #2 11 reseñas | — |
When choosing a contactless check-in solution, your hotel needs to focus on reliability, user experience, integration capabilities, and support. Canary Contactless Check-In has established itself as the leading option, thanks to its extensive feature set, high user ratings, and proven market presence, unlike Myra Self Check-in, which lacks recent reviews and a broader feature profile.
Both products aim to reduce front desk workload and improve guest convenience, but the depth of Canary’s platform makes it the more mature choice for hotels seeking a robust, scalable solution. Are you ready to see which one better suits your hotel's needs?
Canary Contactless Check-In offers a comprehensive platform with 16 exclusive features designed for security, compliance, and guest engagement, while Myra’s offering appears limited to basic self-service check-in solutions. With over 1,391 reviews and a recent surge of 368 reviews in the last six months, Canary’s reputation is well-supported by current user feedback, whereas Myra has no recent reviews or detailed feedback available.
Both products facilitate digital self-check-in, but Canary’s broader feature set, including document scanning, PCI compliance, and customizable questions, provides a more flexible solution for hotels with complex needs. Is your hotel prepared to rely on a solution with a proven track record and extensive capabilities?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich platform with high user satisfaction, go with Canary. Its core strengths lie in seamless integrations, security, and revenue-increasing upsell features, making it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels looking to modernize operations.
If your hotel prioritizes a straightforward, low-cost self-service check-in experience without requiring extensive customization or support, Myra might be enough—however, lack of recent reviews and a smaller partner network suggest it’s less reliable for larger or more complex properties. Given the current data, Canary is the better choice for hotels seeking a trusted, scalable contactless solution.
Canary boasts an impressive 4.82/5 ease of use rating based on extensive reviews, with many hotels praising its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding. Reviewers mention the system’s intuitive design and fast setup, often completing implementation within 20 minutes, supported by a 4.68/5 onboarding rating.
Myra offers mobile and online check-in solutions but lacks detailed ratings or recent user feedback, making it impossible to assess ease of use confidently. Edge: Canary.
Canary provides 16 features exclusive to its platform, including document and passport scanning, payment authorizations, multi-lingual support, and custom questions—none of which are available in Myra. It also offers features like a hotel website portal and marketing opt-in capabilities, adding flexibility.
Myra’s feature set appears limited to basic self-check-in and checkout functionalities, with no detailed feature list or unique capabilities listed. The clear edge goes to Canary for offering a more comprehensive, customizable, and security-focused suite.
Canary’s customer support enjoys a high rating of 4.69/5, with users praising its responsiveness and helpful onboarding assistance. Many reviews highlight how Canary’s support team resolves issues swiftly, which is critical during initial deployment and ongoing use.
Myra’s support ratings are unavailable, and the lack of recent reviews or user feedback makes it difficult to evaluate support quality. Based on available data, Canary’s support is undoubtedly superior. Edge: Canary.
Canary boasts 54 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality and WebRezPro, with three shared integrations. Its extensive partner network ensures easier integration into existing hotel systems, reducing setup friction.
Myra has only four verified partners, including Onity, and fewer available integrations overall. For hotels that rely heavily on integrated systems, Canary’s superior partner ecosystem offers a significant advantage. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s reviews, with over 1,391 ratings, consistently rate it at 4.68/5 overall and 4.82/5 for ease of use, with recent feedback emphasizing system reliability and support. Hotels across segments—from boutique to luxury—appreciate its effectiveness and customer service.
Myra’s lack of recent reviews and detailed ratings makes it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the strong, recent reviews backing Canary, it’s the more trusted product. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no free tier or trial available, making it a predictable investment for hotels seeking a full-featured platform. No pricing information is available for Myra, which suggests either a custom quote or limited transparency.
Without clear pricing details for Myra, Canary’s transparent rate allows easier budgeting. For a scalable, feature-rich solution, the value of Canary’s investment is clearer. Edge: Canary.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or only needs basic check-in features without support for extensive customization.
Not ideal if you need advanced features, detailed security, multi-lingual support, or robust integration options. Larger hotels or those with complex operations should consider Canary instead.
Canary Contactless Check-In stands out as the more thoroughly reviewed, feature-rich, and widely supported solution, making it the go-to choice for hotels aiming to modernize their guest experience. Its extensive partner network, high user ratings, and proven market presence confirm its reliability and scalability.
If your hotel requires a secure, customizable, and well-supported contactless check-in system, Canary is the clear choice, especially given its recent surge in reviews and high satisfaction scores. Conversely, Myra might serve very small, budget-conscious properties needing minimal functionality, but it lacks the depth and confidence that Canary offers.
In summary, for most hotels looking to implement a reliable, feature-packed contactless check-in platform, Canary Contactless Check-In is the recommended solution. It offers a proven track record, ongoing support, and a comprehensive suite of features that will serve your property’s needs today and as you grow.
Los precios de Check-in sin contacto rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Canary Contactless Check-In y Myra comparten 10 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Auditoría de cumplimiento de PCI | ||
| Document & Passport Scanning | ||
| Gestión del ciclo de vida de las amenazas | ||
| Preparación para el cumplimiento | ||
| Pruebas de penetración | ||
| Seguridad de la red |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 4 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
Si bien muchos consideraron que la plataforma de Canary era fácil de usar, varios usuarios informaron problemas al integrarla con sus sistemas de admi... Si bien muchos consideraron que la plataforma de Canary era fácil de usar, varios usuarios informaron problemas al integrarla con sus sistemas de administración de propiedades (PMS) existentes y sugirieron que las mejoras en esta área facilitarían aún más las operaciones.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Canary Contactless Check-In y Myra comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Contactless Check-in, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Canary Contactless Check-In ofrece 54 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Myra ofrece 4. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Canary Contactless Check-In lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Canary Contactless Check-In: No. Myra: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Contactless Check-in ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Canary Technologies tiene un HT Score de 100 y Myra Self Check-in tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos