The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 1,436 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Cloudbeds destaca en cuanto a intuitiveness and ease of use — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.5/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
MISTER BOOKING destaca en customer support and ROI , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Native Email Marketing and Native Email Marketing.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 1,436 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Reseñas verificadas | 1,414 | 22 |
Tras analizar 1,436 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Cloudbeds valoran más su intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management, mientras que los usuarios de MISTER BOOKING destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversión de divisas y operaciones financieras
▾
|
|
|
−
Funcionalidad móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de gestión hotelera para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #2 675 reseñas | #25 10 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 235 reseñas | #24 5 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 51 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #4 5 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 546 reseñas | #28 6 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #3 245 reseñas | #25 4 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #2 145 reseñas | #27 3 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #2 96 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #2 532 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #4 166 reseñas | #11 19 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #3 201 reseñas | #23 0 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #3 13 reseñas | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Misterbooking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline operations and increase bookings, but Cloudbeds offers a broader set of features with a well-established reputation backed by more recent reviews. Misterbooking, while slightly less comprehensive, provides a cost-effective, scalable solution with high customer satisfaction, particularly for independent properties.
Considering the volume of recent feedback, which platform aligns better with your strategic goals and operational scale?
Both Cloudbeds and Misterbooking aim to simplify hotel management by centralizing reservations, operations, and distribution channels. Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, is the most reviewed and awarded platform, boasting a 100/100 score on HotelTechReport and over 1,200 reviews, most recent ones within the last six months. Misterbooking, established in 2003, has a smaller footprint with only 21 reviews, but these are all recent and highly positive, giving it a 4.83/5 overall rating.
Cloudbeds’ extensive feature set includes integrations with revenue management, analytics, and a highly scalable PMS, making it suitable for properties aiming to grow or optimize complex operations. Misterbooking, with fewer features but a responsive interface, appeals to independent hotels seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly system with high customer satisfaction.
Are you prioritizing a proven, feature-rich platform with global support, or a lean, efficient system that’s easy to implement and manage?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated platform that handles reservations, channel management, revenue optimization, and guest engagement at scale, Cloudbeds is the better choice. Its broad partner network and multi-lingual, multi-currency support make it ideal for properties looking to expand internationally. If your team seeks a flexible, scalable solution with a focus on direct bookings and operational simplicity, Misterbooking’s cost-effective, all-in-one design can meet your needs.
For larger properties or those with complex distribution and automation needs, Cloudbeds’ extensive features and recent reviews make it the clear leader. Smaller hotels or chains emphasizing ease of use and quick onboarding might find Misterbooking more aligned with their operational style.
If you want a comprehensive, globally-supported system, go with Cloudbeds. If you prefer a straightforward, responsive platform with high satisfaction scores, choose Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds’ interface is highly rated at 4.58/5 and is praised for its intuitive navigation, quick onboarding, and user-friendly design, which makes staff adoption relatively straightforward. Many recent reviews highlight its ease of use, especially for properties that need to manage multiple channels and complex operations.
Misterbooking slightly edges out with a 4.6/5 score and is recognized for a responsive, straightforward interface that hotel teams find efficient, especially for independent properties. Reviewers note it’s easy to learn and manage, with clear reservation and booking screens.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds offers a suite of 57 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, housekeepings, automated reporting, and multi-lingual support. Its integrations with over 190 partners enable extensive connectivity with OTAs, POS systems, and revenue tools, supporting properties of all sizes.
Misterbooking, with only 5 unique features, focuses on core hotel operations such as reservations, channel management, pre-check-in, and payment automation. While less feature-rich, it excels at providing a streamlined, cost-effective solution.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support score is 4.38/5, with reviews mentioning quick, attentive responses but occasional slowdowns during busy periods. Some users describe their support as friendly and helpful, though a few note long wait times for complex issues.
Misterbooking’s customer support rating stands out at 4.79/5, with reviews emphasizing its operational effectiveness and responsiveness. Users report that the team is helpful, with quick resolutions to issues, especially given the smaller team size.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, revenue management, and payment providers, with 15 shared partners with Misterbooking. Its broad integration network allows for extensive automation, data synchronization, and operational flexibility.
Misterbooking has 26 verified partners, including key OTAs and payment systems, with some exclusive integrations like Vingcard, RoomCloud, and Onity. While fewer in number, these integrations are sufficient for many independent hotels.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 1,219 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, extensive features, and reliable support. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and hostel operations, praise its scalability and automation.
Misterbooking scores slightly higher at 4.83/5 from 21 reviews, with all recent feedback highlighting its simplicity, responsiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Independent hotels appreciate its flexibility and ease of managing high volumes with fewer features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds is priced at a flat $500 monthly fee with no trial or freemium option, offering a transparent cost for its extensive capabilities. Misterbooking’s pricing is not publicly listed but is positioned as a competitive, scalable solution for independent hotels, often viewed as more affordable.
If your budget is tight or you prefer a pay-as-you-grow model, Misterbooking’s lower-cost structure may appeal. For larger or growing properties, Cloudbeds’ value justifies its higher investment.
Not ideal if you want a simple, budget-friendly solution for very small properties or single-location hotels with minimal distribution needs.
Not ideal if you require a highly customizable or feature-rich platform that handles complex revenue management or extensive multi-channel distribution.
Cloudbeds is a versatile, feature-rich platform suited for properties that need a scalable, globally supported system capable of handling complex operations. Its ability to connect operations, revenue, and distribution makes it ideal for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
If your hotel needs deep integration, automation, and a proven track record backed by thousands of recent reviews, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its broad partner network and extensive feature set justify its higher price point for properties seeking a comprehensive solution.
Misterbooking, with its high customer satisfaction and competitive pricing, appeals to independent hotels and small chains that prefer simplicity and agility. It’s best for properties that want a straightforward, responsive PMS with core automation, without the need for extensive features or integrations.
For most hotels looking for proven reliability, broad capabilities, and ongoing innovation, Cloudbeds stands out as the stronger option.
Los precios de Software de gestión hotelera rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Cloudbeds HMS y Misterbooking (HMS) comparten 33 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conectividad PMS | ||
| Gestión centralizada de usuarios y roles | ||
| Integraciones bidireccionales en tiempo real | ||
| La gestión del inventario | ||
| Marketing por correo electrónico nativo | ||
| Marketing por correo electrónico nativo | ||
| Panel de análisis | ||
| Planificación de turnos | ||
| Plurilingüe | ||
| Punto de venta | ||
| Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 50 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Se han detectado problemas con la precisión de la conversión de divisas, especialmente en operaciones multimoneda. Los usuarios han señalado discrepan... Se han detectado problemas con la precisión de la conversión de divisas, especialmente en operaciones multimoneda. Los usuarios han señalado discrepancias que afectan a los procesos de conciliación. La mejora de la configuración para la conversión de divisas podría simplificar la gestión financiera.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Cloudbeds HMS y Misterbooking (HMS) comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Hotel Management Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Cloudbeds HMS ofrece 189 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Misterbooking (HMS) ofrece 26. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Cloudbeds HMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.6/5 vs 4.6/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Cloudbeds HMS: No. Misterbooking (HMS): No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Hotel Management Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Cloudbeds tiene un HT Score de 100 y MISTER BOOKING tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos