The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 43 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
DJUBO destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
GuestCentric destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 43 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Reseñas verificadas | 20 | 23 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de reservas de hotel para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #7 5 reseñas | #3 9 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #16 0 reseñas | #7 5 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | — | #9 0 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | #12 0 reseñas | #6 1 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 3 reseñas | #4 11 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #11 2 reseñas | #7 8 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | #13 0 reseñas | #7 4 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #10 0 reseñas | #3 5 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | #13 0 reseñas | #15 4 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #14 17 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #2 5 reseñas | #12 0 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente | #11 0 reseñas | #10 0 reseñas |
Choosing between DJUBO and GuestCentric for your hotel’s reservations and management needs hinges on your operational complexity, regional focus, and feature priorities. Both products aim to streamline reservations, inventory, and revenue, but they do so differently. DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform with extensive features and a strong global presence, while GuestCentric emphasizes a user-friendly CRS with a focus on direct booking growth. Which aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both DJUBO and GuestCentric cater to hotels seeking to centralize reservations and operational management. DJUBO’s platform integrates PMS, channel management, POS, revenue, and guest feedback modules—effectively replacing several systems with one. GuestCentric, on the other hand, specializes in a CRS and booking engine designed to maximize direct bookings and simplify inventory management.
While DJUBO boasts a wide-ranging feature set—30 unique features—GuestCentric offers a streamlined interface with fewer features but a focus on conversion-driven reservations. DJUBO’s platform is more suited for hotels needing an all-in-one solution across multiple operational facets, especially if regional coverage in Asia, Africa, or North America is critical. GuestCentric excels in providing a highly rated CRS with strong customer support and is preferred by boutique and city center hotels.
The core divergence lies in scope versus specialization. DJUBO’s broad feature set makes it an ideal choice for hotels seeking comprehensive management under one roof. GuestCentric’s targeted reservation system is better if your hotel prioritizes direct bookings and ease of use.
Are you looking for a complete management platform or a focused CRS to boost direct reservations?
If your hotel needs a full-stack hospitality platform that combines PMS, channel management, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its 20 reviews in the last six months, with a 5/5 overall rating, reflect a high level of satisfaction among users of various property types, especially independent hotels in Asia Pacific and North America.
Conversely, if you require a user-friendly CRS and booking engine primarily for increasing direct reservations, GuestCentric’s platform, with 19 recent reviews and a 4.75/5 rating, is preferable. It is particularly favored by boutique hotels and city center properties, emphasizing ease of use and customer support.
For multi-property operations or hotels needing integrated management, DJUBO’s extensive features and regional coverage make it the better fit. For smaller properties or those emphasizing direct bookings with a simple interface, GuestCentric is a more targeted solution.
Would your hotel benefit from a complete operational system or a focused reservation engine?
Both products score nearly identically on ease of use—DJUBO at 4.65/5 and GuestCentric at 4.66/5—indicating that users find both platforms intuitive. DJUBO’s interface is praised for its look and feel, particularly its mobile app, with reviews highlighting its practicality for multi-property management.
GuestCentric’s platform is lauded for being highly user-friendly, reducing clicks and simplifying the reservation process, especially appreciated by smaller teams or boutique hotels. Training and onboarding are rated similarly, at approximately 4.57/5, with some reviewers noting a need for clearer communication during setup.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO’s platform includes 30 unique features, covering channel management, multi-currency, PMS, POS, revenue management, guest feedback, and advanced rate shopping. It offers modules that support group bookings, housecleaning, metasearch connectivity, and mobile apps—making it a robust, all-in-one solution.
GuestCentric’s CRS does not list additional features beyond its core reservation and booking engine, focusing on direct reservation conversion and inventory management. Its core strength is the booking engine and website integration, but it doesn’t provide the extensive modules DJUBO offers.
Edge: DJUBO.
GuestCentric’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially for larger properties or those needing quick resolutions. Users frequently praise its friendly and competent team, with consistent praise for solving issues promptly.
DJUBO’s support, rated at 4.63/5, is also well-reviewed, with comments noting responsive, helpful service. However, some reviews suggest reporting could be more robust, and additional customization options would be beneficial.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric integrates with 44 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, payment gateways, and distribution channels—making it highly flexible for larger, complex properties. Its integrations include platforms like Omnibees, WebRezPro, and yieldPlanet, alongside shared partners like Tripadvisor.
DJUBO’s integration pool is narrower, with 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but it covers core needs like channel management and PMS connectivity. Its fewer integrations may limit flexibility for properties relying on diverse third-party tools.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO has a 5/5 overall rating from 20 recent reviews, primarily from independent hotels and properties across Asia Pacific and North America. Reviewers praise its comprehensive management features and cost-effectiveness, with many emphasizing its suitability for multi-property operations.
GuestCentric boasts a 4.75/5 rating from 19 recent reviews, with a majority from boutique and city center hotels. Customers commend its ease of use, customer support, and effective reservation system.
Overall, DJUBO’s higher review count and recent ratings tilt the scales in its favor, indicating broader hotel satisfaction across segments.
Edge: DJUBO.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, and neither offers a freemium or subscription model. They operate on custom quotes based on hotel size and feature needs, so costs can vary significantly.
Your team should request personalized quotes to compare total costs, considering the scope of features needed and support levels.
Not ideal if your hotel only requires a simple booking engine or minimal operational management.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive management modules or operates across multiple regions with complex distribution needs.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with a broad feature set, suited for hotels seeking operational integration and multi-property management. Its higher review count and recent ratings confirm its strong position in the market, especially for independently operated properties.
GuestCentric excels as a CRS with a focus on direct reservations, high customer support ratings, and ease of use, making it ideal for boutique hotels and properties emphasizing online booking growth. Its extensive integrations are advantageous if your hotel relies on multiple third-party partners.
If your property needs a robust, full-featured management system with regional coverage, DJUBO is the better choice. For hotels focused on boosting direct reservations with minimal operational fuss, GuestCentric remains a compelling option.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating between these two, DJUBO’s broader capabilities and recent review momentum tip the scales in its favor.
Los precios de Software de reservas de hotel rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|---|
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Djubo (CRS) y GuestCentric CRS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gerente de Canal | ||
| Gestión de canales y distribución OTA | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Plurilingüe | ||
| Sistema de gestión de propiedades |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 18 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Mejor posicionado en
Depende de tus requerimientos. Djubo (CRS) y GuestCentric CRS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Hotel Reservations Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Djubo (CRS) ofrece 3 socios de integración verificados, mientras que GuestCentric CRS ofrece 44. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Djubo (CRS) lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.6/5 vs 4.6/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Djubo (CRS): No. GuestCentric CRS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Hotel Reservations Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. DJUBO tiene un HT Score de 0 y GuestCentric tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos