The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 171 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
DJUBO destaca en ease of use and customer support , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Requests and Online Check-in.
Visual Matrix PMS destaca en cuanto a technical support challenges , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest Messaging and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 171 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 19 | 152 |
Tras analizar 171 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de DJUBO valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Visual Matrix PMS destacan technical support challenges, interfaz fácil de usar, comprehensive reporting tools. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Interfaz fácil de usar
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Velocidad del sistema y disponibilidad de funciones
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de gestión hotelera para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #31 3 reseñas | #18 23 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #43 0 reseñas | #2 117 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #11 5 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | #25 0 reseñas | #16 1 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 2 reseñas | #12 38 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #31 2 reseñas | #16 17 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #39 0 reseñas | #1 124 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #31 0 reseñas | #4 44 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #33 0 reseñas | #7 141 reseñas |
| Europa | — | #32 1 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico | #10 3 reseñas | #18 2 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente | #16 0 reseñas | — |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both DJUBO and Visual Matrix PMS aim to streamline your hotel’s daily tasks, but their approaches and strengths differ. DJUBO offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform that consolidates multiple functions, while Visual Matrix PMS specializes in operational efficiency with robust features and integrations. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
DJUBO is a cloud-based, all-in-one platform designed to unify your PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions. It’s built for hotels seeking a centralized system that reduces reliance on multiple disconnected tools, delivering real-time control across operations. Visual Matrix PMS, on the other hand, focuses on optimizing core hotel tasks with an emphasis on automation, staff coordination, and seamless integrations, especially suitable for understaffed properties or those needing quick operational boosts.
The key divergence lies in their scope: DJUBO consolidates many functionalities into one system, while Visual Matrix PMS emphasizes operational speed and ease of use with extensive integrations. DJUBO, with a perfect overall rating of 5/5 and more recent active reviews, clearly demonstrates strong adoption and confidence among hoteliers. Visual Matrix PMS boasts a broader user base, particularly in branded hotels, with a 3.75/5 overall score based on more reviews and a more established presence.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution that reduces complexity, or a specialized PMS that integrates well with existing tools? Your choice depends on your hotel’s scale, staff capacity, and operational priorities.
If your hotel needs a single platform to handle reservations, channel management, POS, revenue, and accounting, DJUBO is the better fit. Its broad feature set, including unique offerings like online check-in and payment requests, makes it appealing for independent hotels and multi-property groups seeking streamlined management.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, staff automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems, Visual Matrix PMS is ideal. Its focus on automation tools like housekeeping, shift planning, and guest messaging—paired with a large partner network—serves understaffed or tech-savvy properties well. For branded hotels looking for a flexible, well-supported platform, Visual Matrix often meets those needs better.
In summary, choose DJUBO when you need a comprehensive, all-in-one management suite. Opt for Visual Matrix PMS if your focus is operational automation, staff coordination, and extensive third-party integrations.
DJUBO scores a remarkable 4.95/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight how quickly staff can adapt to DJUBO, citing the platform's simplicity despite its wide scope, and appreciate its user-friendly design across multiple modules. Training sessions are rated highly, reducing the learning curve for new team members.
Visual Matrix PMS also earns a strong 4.43/5 in usability, with many users citing its familiar interface and ease of navigation. However, some mention that system speed issues and feature bloat can hamper workflows, especially during peak times. Support and onboarding are generally rated well, but the speed limitations are a common concern among users.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 42 features, including unique capabilities like online check-in and payment requests, not available in Visual Matrix PMS. These features support guest self-service and streamlined payments, which are increasingly important in modern hospitality.
Visual Matrix PMS boasts 40 shared features, with 15 additional exclusive functionalities like guest messaging, integrated payment terminals, drag-and-drop tape charts, and guest CRM. Its automation tools, such as shift planning and GDPR compliance, enhance operational control and staff management.
While both systems are rich in features, DJUBO’s unique offerings around payments and check-in give it a slight edge for properties focused on guest experience. Visual Matrix PMS’s automation and extensive integrations make it a strong choice for operational efficiency.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO is rated 4.76/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing its supportive staff and ongoing upgrades. One reviewer highlighted, “The support team is always available and very professional,” reflecting its strong reputation for responsiveness.
Visual Matrix PMS has a support rating of 4.34/5, with users appreciating knowledgeable tech support and helpful weekly tips. Some reviewers mention occasional difficulties in reaching support quickly during critical moments, but overall, support is considered reliable.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO features 3 verified integration partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but its ecosystem is relatively limited. This might restrict your ability to connect with specialized third-party tools if your hotel requires extensive custom integrations.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 23 verified partners, including Hotel Investor Apps, SiteMinder, SkyTouch, and LaaSie.ai. Its broader ecosystem allows more flexible connections with booking engines, POS systems, and revenue tools, making it suitable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
DJUBO has a higher review count (19 reviews), with an outstanding overall rating of 5/5 and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, comprehensive features, and excellent support, especially in the last six months.
Visual Matrix PMS, with 143 reviews and a 3.75/5 rating, has a more extensive history of user feedback. Its recent reviews highlight its operational strengths but also point to speed issues and some missing functionalities. Its higher review volume suggests a mature product with steady user experience.
Considering recency and scores, DJUBO’s reviews lend it a significant edge for current hotelier confidence.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly list specific pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. It operates on a subscription model without a free tier or trial, making its cost structure less transparent upfront.
Visual Matrix PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no free trial or tier, and no mention of additional costs. Pricing appears straightforward but may be prohibitive for smaller properties or those seeking flexible plans.
In absence of clear, comparable data, your best bet is to request quotes directly from vendors to assess value based on your hotel’s requirements.
Not ideal if you require extensive third-party integrations or highly specialized billing features. Smaller boutique hotels might find DJUBO’s comprehensive approach too broad or costly.
Not ideal if speed and system responsiveness are critical during peak times or if your property relies heavily on advanced billing functionalities absent in the platform.
DJUBO stands out as a highly rated, all-in-one platform with a perfect review score and recent positive feedback. It suits independent hotels and multi-property groups that want unified control over their operations without juggling multiple tools.
Visual Matrix PMS excels in operational automation, extensive integrations, and support for understaffed hotels. Its broad feature set and established presence make it ideal for branded hotels and properties seeking a flexible, automation-driven system.
If simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive functionality are your priorities, DJUBO is the clear choice. If your focus is on operational efficiency, automation, and extensive third-party connections, Visual Matrix PMS will serve you better.
For most hotels actively evaluating these options today, DJUBO’s more recent reviews and higher satisfaction ratings position it as the more reliable and scalable solution.
Los precios de Software de gestión hotelera rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Djubo y Visual Matrix PMS comparten 40 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Check-in en línea | ||
| Diagrama de cintas de arrastrar y soltar | ||
| Gestión centralizada de usuarios y roles | ||
| Mensajería centralizada | ||
| Mensajería de invitados | ||
| Mensajería para empleados | ||
| Solicitudes de pago | ||
| Terminal de pago integrado y lector de tarjetas |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 5 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
El diseño intuitivo de Visual Matrix reduce la curva de aprendizaje, haciéndolo accesible para los nuevos empleados. Sin embargo, algunos usuarios men... El diseño intuitivo de Visual Matrix reduce la curva de aprendizaje, haciéndolo accesible para los nuevos empleados. Sin embargo, algunos usuarios mencionan dificultades iniciales al migrar desde otros sistemas.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Djubo y Visual Matrix PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Hotel Management Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Djubo ofrece 3 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Visual Matrix PMS ofrece 23. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Djubo lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.9/5 vs 4.4/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Djubo: No. Visual Matrix PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Hotel Management Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. DJUBO tiene un HT Score de 0 y Visual Matrix PMS tiene 80. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos