The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 23 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Elavon destaca .
roommaster destaca en ease of use and customer support , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 23 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 23 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de procesamiento de pagos para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 6 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 7 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | — | #4 1 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | — | #4 0 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 reseñas |
| Lujo | — | #5 0 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | — | #4 1 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada | — | #4 0 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #4 14 reseñas |
| Europa | — | #5 0 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente | — | #3 0 reseñas |
Choosing between Elavon by Elavon and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Both aim to streamline transactions, but their approaches, features, and support levels differ sharply. Elavon, despite a lack of recent reviews, is a global leader with extensive industry experience, while roommaster Payments boasts a strong recent review presence and high support ratings. Your decision should consider what matters most—comprehensive features, ease of use, or proven support.
Elavon’s primary strength is its extensive hospitality experience, offering end-to-end payment solutions with a global presence. Conversely, roommaster Payments excels in integration and operational efficiency, particularly within property management workflows. Do you need a broad, reliable platform backed by a long track record, or a system that emphasizes integration and user satisfaction? Let’s unpack these options.
Elavon and roommaster Payments both address hotel payment challenges but diverge significantly in execution and recent performance. Elavon’s focus is on secure, scalable transactions, supporting a wide array of payment methods and international markets, but it has no recent reviews or ratings to validate current performance. Roommaster Payments, on the other hand, scores highly in customer support and ease of use, with 20 recent reviews and an average NPS of 8.4, indicating strong user satisfaction.
Elavon’s absence of recent reviews and ratings suggests a lack of current customer feedback, making it difficult to assess performance today. Roommaster Payments’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface and responsive support, making it a more reliable choice for hotels looking for proven service. Are you prepared to rely on a platform with historical reputation but no recent validation, or do you prefer a solution actively praised by users?
If your hotel needs a payment system tightly integrated with your property management operations, go with roommaster Payments. It offers 13 unique features like refund management, contactless payments, and chargeback handling that are crucial for daily hotel transactions. If your priority is a broad, established payment brand with international reach, and you’re comfortable with the lack of recent user feedback, then Elavon might appeal.
Hotels that value operational efficiency and high support ratings should lean toward roommaster Payments, especially if reducing staff workload is a priority. Conversely, if your hotel operates across multiple countries and needs compliance with global transaction standards, Elavon’s extensive experience might be more suitable. Which of these priorities aligns best with your hotel’s current strategic goals?
Based on current reviews, roommaster Payments scores a 4.4/5 for ease of use, while Elavon’s usability rating is unreported. Hotel staff highlight roommaster’s intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and minimal training needs. In contrast, Elavon’s lack of recent reviews or ratings makes it impossible to gauge its current user experience or onboarding quality.
Roommaster Payments’s high ease-of-use rating reflects its design for hospitality workflows, reducing staff errors and speeding up payments. Elavon’s complex global infrastructure may be more difficult to navigate without recent feedback. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments offers 13 features specifically tailored for hotel payments, including authorization adjustments, contactless payments, PCI compliance, and payment splitting—features that are absent from Elavon’s offering. Elavon primarily provides end-to-end payment processing solutions without the detailed features list available from roommaster.
The feature set in roommaster Payments directly addresses common hotel needs such as dispute management, flexible deposit scheduling, and secure card storage, making it a comprehensive tool for daily operations. Elavon’s lack of detailed features or recent user feedback makes it less transparent what functionalities are currently supported. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments’s recent reviews highly praise its support, with a 4.45/5 support rating and an NPS score of 8.4, indicating strong customer satisfaction. Users mention responsive, knowledgeable staff, and quick issue resolution. In contrast, Elavon has no recent reviews or ratings, and its support quality remains unverified.
Given the importance of reliable support in payment processing, roommaster’s recent positive feedback makes it the safer choice for hotels that depend on timely assistance. Without current data on Elavon support, you risk facing unresolved issues or delays. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments has a clear advantage, with 20 recent reviews and an overall NPS score of 8.4. Support ratings and user testimonials confirm a high level of satisfaction among hotel staff, especially in North America and Europe. Elavon’s absence of recent reviews or ratings means its current user sentiment is unknown, making it impossible to determine hotel satisfaction.
Hotels prioritizing proven user experience should opt for roommaster Payments, given its recent positive feedback. Elavon’s long-standing reputation isn’t enough without current validation. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Elavon does not publicly disclose pricing details, which is typical for large, global payment providers—costs are likely negotiated based on volume and needs. roommaster Payments charges a $300 monthly fee, with no mention of additional setup or transaction fees, suggesting a straightforward pricing model.
Your hotel’s size and transaction volume will influence costs with Elavon, but without transparent pricing, comparison is difficult. Conversely, roommaster Payments’s fixed monthly fee provides clarity for budgeting. Which pricing structure fits your hotel’s financial planning better?
Hotels that operate internationally or require a broad payment acceptance network should consider Elavon. It’s suited for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels that prioritize global reach and scalability should lean toward Elavon, but be aware of the lack of recent user validation.
Hotels that value operational simplicity and high user satisfaction should choose roommaster Payments. It’s ideal for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels focused on operational efficiency and support responsiveness should consider roommaster Payments.
The core difference lies in their validation: roommaster Payments boasts a recent, highly positive review base and support ratings, while Elavon’s reputation is based on longstanding industry presence, with no recent feedback. If your hotel needs a straightforward, well-supported payment system, roommaster Payments is the better choice.
Choose Elavon if your hotel operates internationally at scale and requires a provider with global infrastructure, despite the lack of recent reviews. For most hotels prioritizing support, ease of use, and recent satisfaction, roommaster Payments offers a clearer, more dependable path forward.
In conclusion, if recent credibility and user experience matter most, roommaster Payments wins decisively. However, if your hotel’s focus is on a globally recognized provider with extensive reach, Elavon remains a contender, provided you accept the unknowns of current customer support quality.
Los precios de Software de procesamiento de pagos rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Elavon y roommaster Payments comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acepta Visa | ||
| Ajustes de autorización | ||
| Captura parcial | ||
| Función de propina | ||
| Gestión de reembolsos | ||
| Pagar por enlace |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 1 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Elavon y roommaster Payments comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Payments Processing Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Elavon ofrece 3 socios de integración verificados, mientras que roommaster Payments ofrece 56. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. roommaster Payments lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Elavon: No. roommaster Payments: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Payments Processing Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Elavon tiene un HT Score de 0 y roommaster tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Recomendaciones personalizadas adaptadas a su propiedad.