The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 167 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Guestnet destaca en cuanto a user-friendly interface , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Orana Software destaca en ROI and onboarding .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 167 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $500/mo | From $400/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 165 | 2 |
Tras analizar 167 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Guestnet valoran más su user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, experiencia positiva del huésped, mientras que los usuarios de Orana Software destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Experiencia positiva del huésped
▾
|
|
|
+
Personalización y flexibilidad
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Integración con sistemas externos
▾
|
|
|
−
Notificaciones y alertas push
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Aplicaciones para huéspedes de hotel para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #2 56 reseñas | #24 1 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #2 85 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | #17 2 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | #23 0 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 reseñas | #29 2 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #3 66 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #7 18 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #3 14 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | #13 3 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 158 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico | #16 0 reseñas | — |
Choosing between Guestnet by Guestnet and Orana Stay by Orana Software hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to enhance guest communication and streamline services, but they do so with different strengths, user bases, and feature sets. Your team’s priorities—whether it's comprehensive integrations, recent reviews, or feature depth—will guide the best fit for your property.
Guestnet stands out with its extensive review count, recent feedback, and high overall ratings, making it the more proven choice in the current market. Orana Stay, despite fewer reviews, offers a highly rated and straightforward platform, particularly suited for boutique properties aiming for simplicity.
Guestnet and Orana Stay are designed to improve guest engagement through digital communication, but they diverge in their approach and maturity. Guestnet is a well-established platform with a global footprint, integrating with numerous systems and serving a variety of hotel segments. Its reviews highlight a high level of satisfaction, especially among larger hotels and resorts, with a 152 review count and recent feedback from 51 users in the last six months.
Orana Stay, by contrast, is a newer, smaller platform with only 2 reviews, none recent. Its focus is on boutique hotels and small properties, emphasizing ease of use and personalized guest interaction. While its reviews are positive, the lack of recent data makes assessing its current performance more challenging.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive integrations, and a broad market presence, Guestnet is the stronger option. If simplicity and a boutique feel are your priorities, Orana Stay might suffice, but the limited recent feedback suggests less confidence in its current capabilities.
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable guest app with proven success and extensive integrations, go with Guestnet. Its critical mass of reviews and recent positive feedback show it adapts well to large and complex operations, providing features like mobile check-in, room service ordering, and digital compendiums.
If your hotel is a boutique property seeking a straightforward, branded digital concierge with basic guest communication and booking features, Orana Stay could be suitable. Its lower cost and simplicity appeal to small properties, but it lacks the extensive integrations and recent reviews of Guestnet.
For large hotels or resorts prioritizing proven reliability and comprehensive features, Guestnet is the clear choice. For small, independent hotels with minimal digital needs, Orana Stay may suffice, though caution is advised due to limited recent feedback.
Guestnet boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.74/5 from its users, with onboarding rated at 4.66/5. Reviewers praise its intuitive interface, clear information layout, and automation capabilities, which reduce staff training time and speed up adoption. Many highlight how quickly their teams embraced the platform and how guests appreciated straightforward access to services.
Orana Stay scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its simple, branded app design and straightforward setup. However, the limited sample size and absence of recent reviews mean less data on actual staff and guest adoption over time.
Edge: Guestnet, with its more extensive and recent user feedback, demonstrates more consistent ease of use across diverse hotel types.
Guestnet offers 8 shared features plus 4 exclusive to it, including mobile check-in, mobile checkout, room service ordering, and app downloads—features that directly enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its ability to integrate with systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Hotelkit provides a high level of flexibility.
Orana Stay provides core features such as messaging, maps, weather updates, and booking capabilities but lacks the extensive feature set seen in Guestnet. It does not offer mobile check-in or room service options, limiting its utility for larger, more complex properties.
Edge: Guestnet, with more features and integrations, delivers a broader toolkit to elevate guest experience and streamline operations.
Guestnet’s support ratings are very high at 4.82/5, with reviewers citing helpful, responsive teams and seamless onboarding. Users appreciate the support’s availability and the platform’s ongoing development, which aligns with their operational needs.
Orana Stay, rated at 5/5, indicates excellent support, especially given its small team of five. However, the absence of recent reviews and a limited user base makes it difficult to gauge support consistency across all users.
Edge: Guestnet, with more recent reviews and a larger customer base, demonstrates a more reliable and proven support experience.
Guestnet integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and POS systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Websline, ensuring compatibility with a wide variety of hotel management tools. This extensive network supports smoother operations across diverse hotel types and sizes.
Orana Stay has six verified integrations, including Sirvoy, Guesty, and Cloudbeds, offering decent options for boutique hotels. However, its smaller integration network may limit scalability or automation for larger properties.
Edge: Guestnet, with a far broader array of verified integrations, is better suited for hotels seeking extensive system connectivity.
Guestnet’s reviews are plentiful and recent, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and a 9.51/10 NPS score, indicating strong satisfaction across hotel segments, especially luxury and resort hotels. Larger hotels value its flexibility, automation, and integration capabilities.
Orana Stay, with only two reviews and no recent feedback, has a perfect 10/10 NPS but lacks enough data to assess broader hotel satisfaction. Boutique hotels have expressed appreciation for its simplicity, but the limited sample size makes this less conclusive.
Therefore, Guestnet has the edge thanks to its extensive, recent review data and high ratings.
Guestnet’s pricing begins at $500 per month with no freemium model or trial period, reflecting its enterprise-level capabilities. Its pricing structure suggests a focus on larger hotels or chains that need comprehensive features and integration.
Orana Stay costs $400 per month, with no mention of a trial or freemium options. Its lower price point and smaller scale suggest it is aimed at boutique hotels or small properties with basic needs.
Not ideal if your property is very small, with minimal digital infrastructure, or if budget constraints are tight without flexibility.
Not ideal if you need advanced features like mobile check-in, room service ordering, or wide-ranging PMS integrations.
Guestnet excels in serving mid-sized to large hotels and resorts with its broad feature set, proven reliability, and extensive integrations. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm it’s a well-established, trusted platform capable of managing complex operations.
Orana Stay offers a lighter, user-friendly experience tailored to boutique hotels and small properties, with a focus on simplicity and direct guest communication. Its cost-effectiveness and ease of use make it suitable for hotels with limited digital infrastructure, but its lack of recent reviews warrants caution.
If your hotel values a comprehensive, proven solution with ongoing support, Guestnet is the clear choice. If your property is small, boutique, and looking for a basic, easy-to-deploy app, Orana Stay may serve your needs—though more recent feedback is needed to confirm its current performance.
Los precios de Aplicaciones para huéspedes de hotel rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $400/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Guestnet y Orana Stay comparten 8 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Descarga de la aplicación | ||
| Pago móvil | ||
| Pedido del servicio de habitaciones | ||
| Registro móvil |
Analizamos 7 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
Muchos usuarios informan de una mayor satisfacción de los huéspedes gracias al rápido acceso a los servicios y comodidades del hotel a través de Guest... Muchos usuarios informan de una mayor satisfacción de los huéspedes gracias al rápido acceso a los servicios y comodidades del hotel a través de Guestnet, lo que genera comentarios positivos y un posible aumento de las visitas posteriores.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Los usuarios valoran las integraciones de Guestnet con los datos turísticos locales y los sistemas de gestión hotelera, aunque algunos mencionan el de... Los usuarios valoran las integraciones de Guestnet con los datos turísticos locales y los sistemas de gestión hotelera, aunque algunos mencionan el deseo de una mayor integración para mejorar la automatización y reducir las tareas manuales.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Guestnet y Orana Stay comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Hotel Guest Apps, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Guestnet ofrece 20 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Orana Stay ofrece 6. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Orana Stay lidera en facilidad de uso con 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Guestnet: No. Orana Stay: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Hotel Guest Apps ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Guestnet tiene un HT Score de 96 y Orana Software tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos